Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:05]

I CALL TO ORDER THE WEST JORDAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11TH, 2025. ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE IN ATTENDANCE AND HAVING A FUN TIME. WE WILL START OUR MEETING TONIGHT WITH OUR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND WE HAVE A MISS. TANGIE SLOAN WILL LEAD US IN OUR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. WILL THE AUDIENCE PLEASE RISE AND REPEAT THE PLEDGE WITH ME? I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU.

[PUBLIC COMMENT]

THANK YOU. WE WILL GO STRAIGHT TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THOSE THAT ARE HERE IN ATTENDANCE TODAY, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD, PLEASE COME FORWARD. YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO GIVE YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS AND FOR THOSE ONLINE, WE WILL HAVE YOU UP NEXT AS WELL. SO COME AHEAD AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR CITY OF RESIDENCE. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS AMY MATA. I LIVE IN SALT LAKE CITY, AND I AM A VOLUNTEER WITH A NONPROFIT CALLED BAILING OUT BENJI, AND WE WORK TO END PUPPY MILLS AND TO STOP THE SALE OF THOSE PUPPIES IN PET STORES. THESE ARE STORES LIKE THE PUPPY STORE AT JORDAN LANDING. AND I WANT TO SWITCH GEARS IN MY TOPICS. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE MEDICAL ISSUES THAT DOGS IN PUPPY MILLS OFTEN HAVE. THEY OFTEN SUFFER FROM AN ARRAY OF PAINFUL AND POTENTIALLY LIFE SHORTENING VETERINARY PROBLEMS DUE TO OVERCROWDING, UNSANITARY CONDITIONS, AND THE LACK OF PROPER OVERSIGHT OR VETERINARY CARE CONDITIONS COMMON TO PUPPY MILLS, SUCH AS THE USE OF STACKED WIRE CAGES TO HOUSE MORE ANIMALS THAN A GIVEN SPACE SHOULD REASONABLY HOLD, AS WELL AS CONSTANT EXPOSURE TO THE FECES AND URINE OF OTHER DOGS MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR DOGS TO AVOID EXPOSURE TO COMMON PARASITES AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. IN ADDITION, A LACK OF REGULAR PREVENTIVE VETERINARY CARE, CLEAN FOOD, WATER, BASIC CLEANING AND GROOMING, AND CAREFUL DAILY OBSERVATION BY THE OPERATORS MAY CAUSE EVEN MINOR INJURIES OR INFECTIONS TO FESTER UNTIL THEY BECOME SEVERE. THESE DISORDERS CAUSE UNDUE PAIN AND SUFFERING TO THE ANIMALS INVOLVED AND OFTEN RESULT IN PREMATURE DEATH. THESE ARE THE MOST COMMON MEDICAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE FOUND IN PUPPIES AND THE ADULT DOGS LIVING IN PUPPY MILLS, AND THESE ARE THE PARENTS OF THE PUPPIES THAT ARE FOR SALE AT THE PUPPY STORE. AND IN THE FUTURE, I'LL TALK ABOUT THE MEDICAL ISSUES THAT COME FROM POOR BREEDING AND POOR GENETICS, AND ALSO THE BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS THAT STEM FROM THE EMOTIONAL TRAUMA THAT THESE DOGS GO THROUGH. BUT I'LL SAVE THAT FOR A FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. SO I URGE THE COUNCIL TO PASS A HUMANE PET STORE ORDINANCE. AND I AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU AMY. THANK YOU.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. JUST KIDDING. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL.

I'M CHRIS MCCONAUGHEY, WEST JORDAN RESIDENT. WANTED TO PRIMARILY SPEAK TO YOU TONIGHT ABOUT THE BUSINESS ITEM. YOU'LL BE CONSIDERING THE CHANGES TO COUNCIL RULES AND PROCEDURES. A COUPLE THOUGHTS THAT I HAD THAT I WANTED TO SHARE. NUMBER ONE, THERE'S A CHANGE BEING PROPOSED ABOUT TOWN HALL MEETINGS. I'D SUGGEST THAT THERE MIGHT WANT TO BE SOME SORT OF DEFINITION CLARIFYING WHAT A TOWN HALL. WHAT CONSTITUTES A TOWN HALL MEETING VERSUS WHAT IS A COUNCIL MEMBER MEETING WITH NEIGHBORS TO POTENTIALLY PROMOTE THEIR CAMPAIGN, A CAMPAIGN, AN EVENT, AND A TOWN HALL CAN BE VERY, VERY SIMILAR. I'D RATHER NOT SEE COUNCIL RESOURCE, COUNCIL OFFICE RESOURCES PUT TOWARD SOMETHING THAT COULD BE PERCEIVED AS A CAMPAIGN EVENT. NUMBER TWO, THE ONE THAT I HAVE THE MOST CONCERN WITH ARE THE CHANGES TO PUBLIC COMMENT. PROPOSED CHANGES TO HOW THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WORKS. SOME OF THE THINGS I THINK I UNDERSTAND THE RATIONALE BEHIND IT, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S NECESSARY TO GET THE DESIRED OUTCOME. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE INCLUDED ARE A REQUIRED PRE-REGISTRATION IN ORDER TO SPEAK. IT'S NICE TO HAVE A

[00:05:05]

CONTACT CARD WHERE IF SOMEBODY NEEDS TO HEAR BACK FROM SOMEBODY, THEY CAN LEAVE THEIR INFO UP HERE. I THINK THAT WOULD BE GREAT, BUT HAVING TO REQUIRE FOLKS TO SHOW UP EARLY TO FILL OUT THE CARD OR KNOW THEIR THOUGHTS IN ADVANCE, YOU COULD BE SITTING THERE AT LAST MINUTE.

HAVE A THOUGHT. WANT TO COME UP? I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CURRENT PROCESS WHERE THE CHAIR CAN ASK, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO SHARE? THEY CAN WALK UP, SHARE THEIR NAME, AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION. I DON'T KNOW WHAT VALUE WE GET FROM VERIFICATION OF AN EMAIL ADDRESS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT THE NAME BE DISPLAYED, LIKE FULL NAME, BE DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN. IF PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO PARTICIPATE ELECTRONICALLY, IT MIGHT BE KIND OF DIFFICULT IF THERE'S MULTIPLE PEOPLE AT ONE LOCATION. AND THE WAY WE ADDRESS THAT TODAY IS WE JUST ASK THEM TO STATE THEIR NAME. WE HAVE HAD ISSUES IN THE PAST WHERE SOME OF THE CONTENT THAT'S BEEN SHARED DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS HASN'T BEEN HASN'T BEEN IDEAL, HASN'T BEEN THE TYPE OF COMMENT THAT WE'D LIKE TO HEAR. BUT A THE COUNCIL CAN'T REALLY CENSOR THE CONTENT, AND B THE MEASURES THAT ARE PUT IN PLACE JUST MAKES THIS A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT. I WAS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE REQUIREMENT FOR FOLKS THAT DO WANT TO PARTICIPATE ELECTRONICALLY, HAVING TO REGISTER IN ADVANCE, VALIDATE THEIR EMAIL, GET THE LINK, AND THEN THEY ALSO HAVE TO HAVE A FUNCTIONAL CAMERA. ESSENTIALLY THAT COULD ADD SORT OF A MEANS TEST IF YOU JUST HAVE THE PHONE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT GOOD HAVING THE VIDEO WOULD DO IF THAT VIDEO IS NOT SEEN BY THE PUBLIC. IF THE VIDEO RECEIVED BY THE PUBLIC, WE WOULD GIVE POTENTIAL BAD ACTORS ANOTHER AVENUE TO DISRUPT THE COUNCIL MEETINGS.

AND IT ALSO PROHIBITS THOSE THAT DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A SMARTPHONE OR A COMPUTER, OR EVEN PERHAPS TRANSPORTATION. A WAY TO GET HERE. I VERY MUCH LIKE HOW WE'VE BEEN MAKING THINGS EASIER FOR FOLKS. I DON'T SEE A NEED TO TAKE AWAY THE PHONE OPTION, AND I APPRECIATE YOU TAKING TIME TO HEAR ME OUT TONIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CHRIS. YOU HAVE THREE SECONDS.

ANYTHING ELSE YOU CAN. COME ON DOWN. HELLO, I'M ANNE-MARIE BARRETT. I AM A RESIDENT OF DRAPER CITY, BUT I AM THE MANAGER OF THE BINGHAM CREEK LIBRARY HERE IN WEST JORDAN. AND I LIKE TO COME AND GIVE YOU GUYS A LITTLE BIT OF A HEADS UP OF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE GOING AROUND AT THE LIBRARY HERE. SO AT BINGHAM CREEK RIGHT NOW, IT'S A FIRST WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH, AND WE HAVE A VERY FUN ALL MONTH PROGRAM THAT ANYBODY CAN COME IN AND DO AT ANY TIME. IT'S A WOMEN'S ROCK VOTING BRACKET, WHICH IS A VOTING BRACKET FOR VARIOUS FAMOUS ROCK STARS AND POPULAR WOMEN ARTISTS. AND SO ANYBODY CAN COME PARTICIPATE, FILL OUT WHAT THEY THINK THE BRACKET SHOULD LOOK LIKE, VOTE ON IT, HELP US MAKE OUR DECISIONS. IT'S GOING TO BE A REALLY FUN AND THERE IS A PRIZE AT THE END. WE'RE NOT SURE WHAT. SURPRISE.

WE ALSO HAVE A REALLY FUN CHILDREN'S TUMBLEWEEDS FESTIVAL WORKSHOP THAT'S COMING UP ON THE 22ND OF MARCH AT 2 P.M. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE THE UTAH FILM CENTER THERE TO HELP PROVIDE A WORKSHOP ABOUT STORYTELLING AND FILMMAKING, AND IT SHOULD BE REALLY AWESOME. SO WE HOPE TO HAVE SOME KIDS SHOW UP FOR THAT. WE ALSO HAVE A REALLY FUN FAMILY NIGHT COMING UP ON MARCH 27TH AT 7:00 AT NIGHT. WE HAVE THE PLEASE FORGIVE ME. I'M PROBABLY GOING TO SAY IT WRONG, BUT THE DAGON CELESTIAL DANCERS THAT ARE GOING TO BE DOING AN INTERACTIVE IRISH DANCING NIGHT, SO IT'S GOING TO BE REALLY GREAT AND TONS OF FUN. AND THAT'S A FAMILY ACTIVITY. SO WE HOPE TO SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT AGES JOINING US FOR THAT. AND FINALLY, LAST BUT NOT LEAST, WE ARE SO EXCITED. WE JUST HIRED A BRAND NEW TEAM LIBRARIAN. WE HAVE HAD A VACANCY FOR A COUPLE MONTHS NOW, AND SO WE WILL BE VERY SOON. HAVING IN PERSON TEEN PROGRAMING AGAIN. RIGHT NOW WE'VE BEEN DOING KITS WHERE PEOPLE CAN COME IN AND GET SOME STUFF AND MAYBE HANG OUT WITH THEIR FRIENDS, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE IN PERSON AGAIN AND WE'RE SO EXCITED. NOT THIS WEEK. IT'S HER FIRST WEEK, SO WE DON'T WANT TO OVERWHELM HER AND SCARE HER AWAY. BUT DEFINITELY SWING BY AND SAY HI TO SAGE. SHE'S OUR NEW TEEN LIBRARIAN AND SHE IS AWESOME. THANKS SO MUCH. WE LOVE BEING PART OF THE WEST JORDAN COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. DOES ANYBODY ELSE THAT'S IN THE AUDIENCE TODAY PLEASE COME FORWARD? IF NOT, WE'LL GO TO MR. ANDERSON. DO WE HAVE ANY ONLINE? MR. ANDERSON, THERE ARE FOUR ATTENDEES ONLINE COUNCIL AND NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HAND. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL THEN CLOSE OUR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR TONIGHT. OUR NEXT ITEM ON THE

[a. Cultural Arts Society of West Jordan Annual Report]

AGENDA IS REPORTS TO CITY COUNCIL. AND WE HAVE THE CULTURAL ARTS SOCIETY HERE

[00:10:01]

TONIGHT. AND WE WILL INVITE RACHEL CROWLEY TO COME FORWARD AND TELL US ALL ABOUT THE GREAT THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING, ALL THE GREAT THINGS. YOU GUYS CAN HEAR ME TODAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

I'M RACHEL CROWLEY AND WEST JORDAN RESIDENT. I'M GOING TO START WITH OUR ANNUAL REPORT.

OUR MISSION. SORRY. I MEAN, OUR PURPOSE IS TO PROMOTE A RICH CULTURAL LIFE FOR WEST JORDAN RESIDENTS. PROMOTING AND SUSTAINING VISUAL, PERFORMING AND LITERARY ARTS IN OUR COMMUNITY. OUR MISSION FOR ACCOMPLISHING OUR VISION, FOR ACCOMPLISHING THE MISSION IS TO OFFER PROGRAMS THAT SHOWCASE THE ENTHUSIASM AND DIVERSITY OF ARTS, DEVELOP THE LOCAL ART ECOSYSTEM FOR REFLECTION CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ENTIRE POPULATION, PROMOTE CREATIVE INDUSTRIES, AND CREATE THEM AS VITAL PIECES OF THE COMMUNITY. CREATE A LONG TERM LEGACY FOR EACH GENERATION BY PROMOTING PARTICIPATION AND ACKNOWLEDGING A WIDE VARIETY OF ARTISTIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS. ENGAGE THE PUBLIC TO INCREASE INCREASE INVOLVEMENT AND INTERACTION WITH ART. CHAMPION THE PURSE THE PRESERVATION AND APPRECIATION OF PUBLIC ARTS. PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES TO SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGE ARTIST DEVELOPMENT. SERVE AS A RESEARCH RESOURCE FOR INFORMATION ABOUT WEST JORDAN'S ARTISTS AND CULTURAL EVENTS, AND HELP GENERATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY THROUGH ART APPRECIATION. OUR PROGRAMS INCLUDE THE WEST JORDAN CONCERT BAND, SYMPHONY, JAZZ BAND, VISUAL ARTS, LITERARY ARTS, SUGAR FACTORY, PLAYHOUSE, WEST JORDAN YOUTH THEATER. WE AND WE ALSO PARTNER WITH THE WEST JORDAN SENIOR BAND, LYRICAL OPERA THEATER, AND THE MOUNTAIN WEST CHORALE. OUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THE TIME FRAME THAT WE ARE PRESENTING FOR OUR BIGGEST ONES WERE THE SECOND ANNUAL ART IN THE PARK. WE RENTED AND RENOVATED THE CASA CORNER, ALLOWING FOR PROGRAM GROWTH. WE OUTGREW THE VIRIDIAN FOR OUR MESSIAH, SING ALONG, EXPANDED OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM 4 TO 10, AND WE HAD A CAMPAIGN REACHING OUT TO OVER 600 BUSINESSES FOR SPONSORSHIPS. LAUNCHED THE CAZ, WHICH INSIDERS PROGRAM BROUGHT BACK THE LITERARY ARTS PROGRAM. INCREASED OUR CONCERT BAND TO 91 MEMBERS, WHICH IS VERY COOL AND HAVE AN EXTENSIVE GRANT OUTREACH. SORRY ABOUT THIS, YOU GUYS, AND THESE ARE ALL OUR CUTE PICTURES. FOR. 2023. OUR EVENTS PROGRAM SUMMARY. AND I'M GOING TO MAKE THIS PRETTY QUICK BECAUSE IT GETS LONG BECAUSE WE DO SO MANY THINGS. BUT THE CONCERT BAND HAD THEIR PATRIOTIC CONCERT LUCKY STIFF WAS PERFORMED EACH MONTH. THE SENIOR BAND DID PERFORMANCES AT THE RETIREMENT HOMES. WE HAVE AUDITIONS ON A REGULAR BASIS FOR THE YOUTH THEATER AND THE SUGAR FACTORY PLAYHOUSE. THE SUGAR FACTORY PLAYHOUSE PERFORMED HE IS HE DEAD? THE SYMPHONY HAD THEIR FALL CONCERT, YOUTH THEATER PERFORMED LITTLE MERMAID. WE HAVE A CONTINUOUS VISUAL ARTS DISPLAY IN ON THE FIRST FLOOR OF CITY HALL. THE. WE HAD THE HOLIDAY CONCERT, SUGAR FACTORY PLAYHOUSE PERFORMED THE FIVE CAROLS. WE HAD THE MESSIAH SING ALONG MORE OF OUR FABULOUS SENIOR BAND PERFORMING THE SYMPHONY HAD THE SOLO AND ENSEMBLE AUDITIONS. JAB SORRY YOUTH THEATER HAD PERFORMED TARZAN, SUGAR FACTORY HOUSE PLAYHOUSE, DROWSY CHAPERON, MORE CONCERTS FROM THE JAZZ BAND. ART IN THE PARK, THE LITERARY ARTS. WE HAD A VISUAL ARTS BOOK MAKING CLASS, AND SO ON. I'M SO SORRY. THERE ARE AN AVERAGE OF 475 OPPORTUNITIES EACH YEAR TO REHEARSE OR HAVE A CLASS WITH ARTISTS, PERFORMERS, AND MUSICIANS. THERE IS AN

[00:15:05]

ESTIMATED 1173 HOURS AVAILABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN REHEARSAL, CLASS AND PERFORMANCE EACH YEAR.

OUR COMMUNITY IMPACT IS PRETTY IMPRESSIVE, WITH $842,107 OF IN-KIND DONATIONS. I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS WANT TO KNOW SOME OF THESE NUMBERS ABOUT PARTICIPANTS IN. WEST JORDAN, THE CONCERT BAND. WE HAVE 35% OF OUR PARTICIPANTS OF 91%. PARTICIPANTS WHO ARE HERE LIVE HERE IN WEST JORDAN. THEY DID SIX PERFORMANCES IN THE YEAR, AND THEY HAD 1640 ATTENDEES.

THIS IS A DOUBLED AMOUNT FROM THE YEAR BEFORE, WHICH IS PRETTY COOL. THE SYMPHONY HAS 49% WEST JORDAN RESIDENTS OUT OF 74. THEY HAVE SIX PERFORMANCES A YEAR, AND THEIR ATTENDEES COME UP TO 1892. THE JAZZ BAND HAS 39% OF PARTICIPANTS WHO LIVE IN WEST JORDAN. THEY HAVE 18 TOTAL, SEVEN FOR SEVEN PERFORMANCES A YEAR, 1015 OF ATTENDED, AND THAT IS ALSO NEARLY DOUBLED. VISUAL ARTS HAS 90. 90% OF THE PARTICIPANTS ARE IN WEST JORDAN, AND WE HAVE SEEN ABOUT 3600 PEOPLE, BOTH IN CITY HALL AND AT THE. ART IN THE PARK. THE SUGAR HOUSE FACTORY, SUGAR FACTORY, PLAYHOUSE. I'M SO SORRY. I'M NEVER GOING TO GET THAT RIGHT. HAS 48% OF THE RESIDENTS IN WEST JORDAN. THEY HAVE 68 PARTICIPANTS TOTAL 36 DAYS A YEAR. DO THEY PERFORM? AND THEY PERFORM TO 1455 ATTENDEES. YOUTH THEATER DOUBLED THEIR AMOUNT OF WEST JORDAN RESIDENTS TO 40, MAKING IT 44% OF PARTICIPANTS IN WEST JORDAN. THEY HAD 18 DAYS THAT THEY PERFORMED DURING THE YEAR, AND 2937 PEOPLE ATTENDED THOSE PERFORMANCES. OOPS. SORRY. YOUTH THEATER HAD 8%. PEOPLE LIVING IN WEST JORDAN 24 DAYS. THEY DID EVENTS BRINGING IN 344 PEOPLE TO WEST JORDAN. SO I MEAN, IT KIND OF OFFSETS PEOPLE COMING INTO HERE. SO TOTAL SORRY, TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH MY SELF HERE. TOTAL PARTICIPATION. WE HAVE 203 PARTICIPANTS WHO LIVE IN WEST JORDAN, 213 WHO DO NOT, MAKING IT 417 TOTAL, 49% OF THEM LIVE IN WEST JORDAN, 99 PERFORMANCES ARE DONE DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR, BRINGING IN 10,991 PERFORMANCE ATTENDEES. SO MUCH BETTER THAN THE YEAR BEFORE. OUR FINANCIALS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 20 OR JULY 2023 THROUGH JUNE 2024, OUR REVENUE BUDGET WAS 181,607 OR $70. ACTUAL WAS $147,159, WITH A DIFFERENCE OF 34,511. EXPENSES CAME UP AT FOR THE BUDGET WAS $155,265. ACTUAL CAME OUT AT 128,993, WITH A DIFFERENCE OF.

$26,272. FOR OUR APPLICATION FOR THIS YEAR, WE ARE EXPECTING AND HAVE INTRODUCED A NEW DATA AND TICKETING SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED DATA AND MARKETING. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE OUR FIRST ANNUAL BOOK AND AUTHOR FESTIVAL. MORE THEATER SHOP WORKSHOPS. WE ARE INTRODUCING MORE LEADERSHIP TRAINING FOR OUR GROUPS SO THEY CAN HAVE BETTER MARKETING, BUDGETING, LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATION. WE HAVE ENHANCED MORE ENHANCED BOARD INVOLVEMENT AND COMMITTEES. OUR PROGRAM EVALUATION DATA AND BUDGET APPROVALS FOR EACH GROUP HAVE BEEN IMPROVED. WE HAVE A

[00:20:05]

STRATEGIC PLAN, DEVELOPED, A SPONSORSHIP PITCH DECK HAS BEEN INTRODUCED WHICH INSIDERS AND INSIDER ELITES HAVE BEEN PUSHED MORE. WE WILL HAVE POTENTIAL REVENUE THROUGH LIGHT AND SOUND RENTAL, AND WE ARE BRINGING ON ADDITIONAL PARTNERS AND GROUPS THROUGH AN APPLICATION PROCESS.

OUR. WE ARE BUDGETING FOR THE REVENUE OF $204,500. OUR EXPENSES ARE SHOULD COME IN AT $204,499. AND. OUR WEEKLY REHEARSAL SCHEDULE AT THE CORNER. JAZZ BANDS HAVE TUESDAY EVENINGS. CONCERT BAND HAS THURSDAY EVENINGS. SYMPHONY HAS SATURDAY EVENINGS, SUGAR FACTORY PLAYHOUSE AND THE WEST JORDAN THEATER. SWITCH OFF FOR MONDAY, WEDNESDAY AND SATURDAY EVENINGS.

LITERARY ARTS HAS THE THIRD THURSDAY OF EVERY MONTH. VISUAL ARTS IS AT CITY HALL AND ON THE FIRST FLOOR, AND THEY HAVE FREE CLASSES ON THE FOURTH THURSDAY OF EVERY MONTH. AND WE HAVE ACTIVITIES ALL THROUGH THE YEAR. I'M GOING TO SKIP THIS BECAUSE I THINK IT'S KIND OF REDUNDANT.

SORRY. DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK. THANK YOU. FIRST I WANT TO THANK YOU, RACHEL. YOU DID A GREAT JOB AND I WANT TO THANK THE ARTS GROUP FOR IMPROVING AND MANY THINGS THAT THEY BRING TO US. THEIR FIRST BUDGET WAS VERY INTERESTING AND WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY IDEA WHO WAS PARTICIPATING. SO NOW WE DO. SO HERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS I'M GOING TO PROPOSE AND ASK THAT YOU TAKE BACK TO THE COMMITTEE, TO YOUR BOARD. BECAUSE EVEN IN YOUR PURPOSE, IT STATES THAT IT'S FOR WEST JORDAN RESIDENTS. BUT ACTUALLY WE'RE SERVICING 100% MORE NON JORDAN RESIDENTS. SO I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT PARTICIPATION FEE GOES UP FOR NON RESIDENTS SO THAT THE RESIDENTS AREN'T SUBSIDIZING THE NON RESIDENTS QUITE SO MUCH THAT THEY'RE PAYING A LITTLE MORE. I THINK THAT'S FAIR. SO I'D ASK YOU TO PROPOSE THAT. THE OTHER THING THAT I'M ACTUALLY PROPOSING HERE IS WHEN I LOOK AT WHAT YOUR FACILITIES COST WAS, IT WAS 52 I THINK 52 AND SOME CHANGE AND YOU'RE AND YOU'RE SAYING THAT IT'S GOING TO GO UP 21,000. BUT FIFTH THAT YOU WANT 21,000 MORE. AND A BIG PORTION OF THAT IS FOR THE BUILDING USE.

BUT I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE BECAUSE IT WAS 52. AND IF YOU ADD THE 21 TO THE 52, YOU DON'T GET UP TO THE 80. SO I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT INSTEAD OF US JUST GIFTING YOU 20,000, I WOULD RATHER PROPOSE THAT WE GO AHEAD AND INCREASE THAT BY 11, BUT THEN MAKE THE SECOND 10,000 BE A MATCHING GRANT THAT YOU'VE GOT TO RAISE 10,000 FROM SOME OTHER ENTITY TO THEN GET THE SECOND TEN. SO WHEN IT COMES BUDGET TIME, JUST BE PREPARED THAT THAT'S WHAT I'M GOING TO SUGGEST. I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT GOES ON. I LIKE GOING DOWNSTAIRS AND LOOKING AT THE ART EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER MEETING. SO I THINK IT'S GREAT TO HAVE IT IN THE BUILDING AND I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON. SO YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT THE MESSIAH. SING ALONG. OUTGREW THE VIRIDIAN. WHERE'S IT BEING HELD NOW? DO I KNOW THIS ANSWER? JUST CURIOUS MORE THAN ANYTHING. ONE OF THE HIGH SCHOOLS. OH, OKAY. OKAY, COOL. IT WAS A RESTAURANT.

YES. VERY GOOD. THANKS. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS WITH SOME OF THE LIKE THE UTAH ARTS GRANTS. HAS THAT BEEN APPROVED ALREADY FOR THIS YEAR? THE. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ZAP THE ZAP? YES. NO, I DON'T THINK WE CAN TURN THAT IN UNTIL THE END OF APRIL. OKAY. ARE THERE CONTINGENCY PLANS IN PLACE IN CASE THAT DOESN'T COME THROUGH? YES. WE ARE WORKING ON A FUNDRAISING PLAN. WE HAVE SOME. EVERYBODY IN EACH GROUP IS GOING INTO A FUNDRAISING GROUP TO HOPEFULLY THAT WORKS THROUGH THAT. BUT YES, WE ARE WORKING ON THAT BECAUSE IT DIDN'T COME

[00:25:03]

THROUGH LAST YEAR. IT DIDN'T COME THROUGH LAST YEAR. WELL, THEY GOT SOME, JUST NOT THE AMOUNT THAT WE WANTED. YEAH. AND I IMAGINE THAT'S JUST GOING TO GET TOUGHER AND TOUGHER. YEAH.

YES. IS THE PROJECTED REVENUE GROWTH REALISTIC? I KNOW THINGS ARE GETTING TOUGH. AND IF NOT, IS THERE PLANS AND EXISTING FUNDRAISING OR YOU KNOW, WHAT HAPPENS IF THE EXISTING FUNDRAISING AND TICKET SALES ALSO FALL SHORT? I KNOW THESE ARE TOUGH QUESTIONS, BUT NO, THEY'RE FINE. I MEAN, IF THE MONEY DOESN'T COME IN, THEN YOU CUT YOUR BUDGET. YOU HAVE TO.

IT'S JUST HOW YOU HAVE TO DO IT. BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF THE MUSIC GROUPS HAVE HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED A FEE FOR PARTICIPATION, WHICH THEY DIDN'T HAVE BEFORE. AND THAT'S BEEN SUPPLEMENTING A LOT OF PLACES WHERE LIKE THEY'RE HAVING TO RENT TO GO TO BIGGER PLACES AND STUFF. SO I THINK THAT HAS HELPED. AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN LOOK AT FOR OTHER THINGS.

DO YOU HAVE PARTICIPATION BENCHMARKS FOR LOCAL ENGAGEMENT, SUCH AS LIKE A TARGET OF 60% WEST JORDAN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, OR WE DO NOT, BUT WE CAN DEFINITELY DISCUSS THAT. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS. I'M I'M KIND OF I'M AT LEAST IN THE SAME BALLPARK AS AS COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK. I'M LOOKING AT THE BUDGET AND I SEE THAT THE PROJECTED 80 K FROM US IS THE HIGHEST AMOUNT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE AND I, I WOULDN'T CARE, BUT I'D LOVE TO SEE A PROJECTED BUDGET THAT THE PROGRAM SERVICE REVENUE, THE ADMISSIONS, THE TUITION, THE ENROLLMENT AT LEAST EQUALS OUR GRANT. I THINK I WOULD I WOULD SOME SO THAT THAT TIES INTO SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK SAID. ANOTHER THOUGHT IS BUT I'M NOT GOING TO HOLD YOU STRICTLY TO THAT, BUT IT'S A GOOD GOAL. I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD GOAL, YEAH, IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW JUST AS A JUST AS A SECONDARY PERFORMANCE PLACE INSTEAD OF WEST JORDAN HIGH, YOU MAY WANT TO LOOK AT SEEING IF THERE IS HOW MUCH THE SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAMPUS, THEY HAVE A QUITE LARGE AUDITORIUM OUT THERE THAT HOLDS QUITE A LOT OF PEOPLE. SO YOU MAY WANT TO LOOK AT THAT BECAUSE I'M NOT SURE HOW MUCH THEY CHARGE, BUT JUST SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT IN THE FUTURE. AND ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE ONE IN WEST JORDAN? OKAY. THEY ACTUALLY HAVE A THAT THAT CAMPUS HAS GOT AN AUDITORIUM IN IT. I DON'T. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SIZE IS OR ANYTHING. I JUST KNOW IT HAS AN AUDITORIUM. OKAY. AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST. AS SOME FEEDBACK I. I SAW THE. NAME OF SEAT NAME A SEAT FUNDRAISER FOR THE LIGHTS IN THE IN THE. COMMUNITY AND ART CENTER. BOY, I JUST WENT BLANK.

I MUST NEVER MIND. BUT I SAW THAT AND I'M GOING TO CHALLENGE THE REST OF THE COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVEN'T BOUGHT A SEAT, IF YOU HAVEN'T PAID FOR A SEAT WITH YOUR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY'S NAME ON IT, YOU PROBABLY OUGHT TO DO IT WITH WITH COUNCILMAN GREEN ON THIS. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AND ANY OTHER THOUGHTS? VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK, I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION, BUT I JUST WOULD LIKE TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO STATE WHAT THAT IS AND HOW YOU PARTICIPATE. WE GOT THE EMAIL THAT PERHAPS PEOPLE LISTENING HAVEN'T SEEN THE INFORMATION, THE LIGHTS THAT WE GET. LIGHTS. YEAH. LIFE IS STAGE CAMPAIGN IS A HOLD ON. I HAVE TO FIND THIS EARLIER. IT IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO NAME THE SEATS SO THAT WE CAN HELP PAY FOR THE LIGHTING IN THE BUILDING, WHICH IS A SUPER NICE FUNDRAISER, AND YOU CAN PUT YOUR OWN NAME ON THE THING. THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR 5000, 1500 AND $250 THINGS. IF YOU GET TO HANG OUT WITH THE MAYOR, YOU GET A COIN. IF YOU HIT LIKE A CERTAIN DOLLAR AMOUNT, YOU GUYS SHOULD YOU GUYS SHOULD TOTALLY DO THAT BECAUSE I KNOW YOU WANT TO HANG OUT WITH THE MAYOR. I KNOW THAT, BUT IT DEFINITELY BENEFITS THE COMMUNITY FOR THAT ONE BECAUSE EVERYBODY GETS INVOLVED IN THAT. AND RACHEL, WHERE WOULD THEY GO TO FIND OUT HOW TO DONATE? IS THERE A WEBSITE. IS THERE ON THE. WJ ARTS.ORG. THANK YOU.

YEAH, THANKS FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT. WELL THANK YOU FOR ALL THE HARD WORK YOU DO. AND THANK

[00:30:07]

YOU TO ALL OF YOUR VOLUNTEERS. WE KNOW NONE OF YOU ARE MAKING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS DOING THIS.

YOU'RE DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF THE ARTS. THAT'S VERY TRUE. SO COMMUNITY. YES. THANK YOU.

[a. Resolution No. 25-010 requesting the City Council waive dumpster rental fees in the amount of $750 for Browns Meadow Neighborhood Cleanup Day]

THANKS. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS. WE WILL START WITH PUBLIC HEARING A RESOLUTION. NUMBER 25, DASH 010, REQUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL WAIVE DUMPSTER RENTAL FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF 750 FOR THE BROWNS MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD CLEANUP DAY. ALLEN, DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT THIS? AND THEN IF MR. ANDERSON IS HERE TONIGHT. YES. SO, MISS ANDERSON, WHO'S HERE REPRESENTING THE BROWNS MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH PROGRAM, SHE IS REQUESTING A WAIVER OF DUMPSTER FEES. YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THIS? IT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.

THE FEE SCHEDULE THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVED IS $75 PER DUMPSTER, WHICH IS. WHICH IS THE. SORRY. IS THE FOR THE TEN DUMPSTERS. IT'S $750 FOR TEN DUMPSTERS THAT WOULD GO ON RESIDENTS PROPERTY. THIS IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 3RD, 2025. SHE'S ALREADY ARRANGED WITH PUBLIC WORKS TO RESERVE THE DUMPSTERS. THIS IS THE PROCESS TO WAIVE THE FEES OF THE $75 PER DUMPSTER. I ALSO INCLUDED IN THE FISCAL NOTE, BECAUSE THE COUNCIL SUBSIDIZES THE FIRST DUMPSTER AT $75, THE CURRENT SUBSIDY IS APPROXIMATELY $182.56 PER DUMPSTER. BUT THE COUNCIL'S ADOPTED THAT SUBSIDY TO ANY RESIDENT TO USE THE PROGRAM CITYWIDE ON THE FIRST DUMPSTER.

SUBSEQUENT DUMPSTERS PAY FOR THEM. THEY THEY'RE THEY PAY FOR THEMSELVES. THE CITY CODE 261 OUTLINES THE PROCESS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES TO REQUEST A FEE WAIVER, WHICH IS MAKE AN APPLICATION, WHICH SHE HAS DONE. IT'S BEEN NOTICED AS A PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. MISS ANDERSON HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR APPROXIMATELY 11 YEARS, AND IT ENGAGES 70 TO 100 VOLUNTEERS ANNUALLY. AND OBVIOUSLY, I'M PRETTY SURE THAT SHE'S HAPPY TO HAVE ALL SEVEN OF YOU COME THAT DAY AND HELP. SO THAT IS WHAT'S BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. AND I DID INVITE MISS ANDERSON TO BE HERE IN CASE YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS FOR HER. JENNIFER, DID YOU WANT TO COME FORWARD AND GIVE US SOME INFORMATION FROM YOUR SIDE? THEY TOLD ME YOUR HUSBAND WAS COMING TONIGHT, SO I SAID, MR. ANDERSON, HE WAS COMING, BUT HE'S IN CALIFORNIA TAKING CARE OF AN ILL BROTHER. AND YEAH, WE'VE ACTUALLY BEEN DOING THIS FOR 15 YEARS. WE STARTED WE STARTED WITH A BREAKFAST AND WE GO FROM NINE TO NOON. YOU'RE ALL WELCOME TO JOIN US, EITHER JUST AT THE BREAKFAST OR COME WITH SOME GLOVES AND HELP US ON SOME PROJECTS. THIS IS THE BIGGEST PROJECT WE DO IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALL YEAR, AND IT REALLY BRINGS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER. AND IT GETS RID OF A LOT OF GARBAGE BECAUSE WE HAVE A COUPLE MEN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAVE BACKHOES AND THEY COME AND SCOOP UP THE STUFF PEOPLE PUT ON THEIR DRIVEWAYS AND THEY'RE LOADING IT IN. I MEAN, THERE'S A THERE'S A LOT OF ACTION GOING ON. SO WE JUST REALLY APPRECIATE THE SUPPORT THAT WEST JORDAN HAS GIVEN US IN THE PAST AND HOPE THAT YOU'LL SUPPORT US WITH THE FEE WAIVER AGAIN THIS YEAR. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? RIGHT NOW? OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, THANK YOU. I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. YOU'RE GOOD.

YOU CAN GO SIT DOWN. I FORGOT TO BRING A PEN TODAY, SO I'M TAKING NOTES ON MY COMPUTER AND I WASN'T FAST ENOUGH. CAN YOU TELL ME THE PRICE OF THE SECOND DUMPSTER ON UP? I DON'T HAVE THE PAPER HERE. I BELIEVE THE SECOND DUMPSTER FOR A RESIDENT IS 300. YOU GAVE ME THE AMOUNT THAT IT'S SUBSIDIZED BY. JUST A SECOND AGO. YOU HAD IT DOWN TO THE PENNY. 178. THE SUBSIDY IS. IT SHOULD BE 75 PLUS THE 182, ONE 82, 56, ONE 8250. THANK YOU. THAT'S WHAT I NEEDED. AND COUNCIL, I NEGLECTED TO MENTION STATE LAW 1082 FEE WAIVERS. COLLECTIVELY, ALL THE FEE WAIVERS YOU DO CAN'T EXCEED 1% OF THE BUDGET. AND IN CHECKING WITH MISS STECK IN FINANCE, IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS RCA, THAT AMOUNT IS $740,000. AND THIS DOES NOT OBVIOUSLY COME CLOSE. I THINK THIS IS THE FIRST ONE THIS BUDGET YEAR. AND I BELIEVE THIS IS OUR FIRST ONE OF THE YEAR. CORRECT. FOR THE BUDGET YEAR. YES. OH, OKAY. BUDGET YEAR, THIS IS THE FIRST ONE OF 2025 BUT NOT THE BUDGET YEAR. OKAY. SINCE JULY 19TH. SO THIS IS THE ONLY ONE THROUGH THE

[00:35:07]

WHOLE YEAR IS WHAT IT'S CRAZY. ALL RIGHT. DID YOU WANT TO COME BACK UP? YEAH. IT JUST CAME TO MY MIND THAT IF YOU WOULD LIKE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS TO START A PROGRAM LIKE THIS, YOU ARE WELCOME TO INVITE, YOU KNOW, NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVES TO COME AND SEE WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE DO IT, BECAUSE WE SEE THE BENEFIT IT IS TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WE HOPE THAT OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS WILL DO IT, TOO. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS, WE WILL MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING PORTION FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. IF YOU'RE HERE WITH US TONIGHT AND WANT TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME FORWARD AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. THANK YOU.

CHRIS MCCONAUGHEY, WEST JORDAN RESIDENT AND I AM EMPHATICALLY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS WAIVER REQUEST. VERY MUCH LIKE WHAT MR. ANDERSON SUGGESTED, TRYING TO SEE HOW WE COULD GET OTHER OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS TO DO SOMETHING SIMILAR. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE COUNCIL HAVE A PRE ALLOCATED AMOUNT IN THE BUDGET THAT SITS WITH THE COUNCIL OFFICE DIRECTOR THAT CAN BE APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY, AND MAYBE REDUCE SOME OF THE NERVES THAT PEOPLE MAY HAVE COMING TO US THAT DIRECTLY TO THE COUNCIL, IF IT'S ALREADY SET ASIDE PART OF THE BUDGET THAT ALREADY MEETS WHAT'S REQUIRED. IF IT COULD BE DONE THERE, I THINK THAT WOULD BE FANTASTIC. THE OTHER THOUGHT IS IF WE COULD ENCOURAGE THOSE GROUPS THAT HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH OR PARTICIPATE THERE TO TRY AND DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS. WE HAVE A FEW MONTHS. WE HAVE THE NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IN AUGUST, BUT IF WE HAD SOMETHING IN THE SPRING AS WELL, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE CARE GIVEN TO THE ESTHETICS OF OUR CITY. THE COUNCIL HAS MADE THE ESTHETICS OF OUR CITY A PRIORITY FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, AND THIS IS A FANTASTIC WAY TO HELP OUT NEIGHBORS IN THEIR OWN YARD AND VERY MUCH SUPPORT IT. SO THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME RANT. ALL RIGHT. APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU CHRIS. WOULD ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO COME FORWARD? MR. ANDERSON, IS ANYBODY ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. THERE ARE THREE INDIVIDUALS ONLINE AS ATTENDEES, NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HAND. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL THEN CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL MOVE TO EITHER DISCUSSION OR A VOTE. A MOTION. SORRY. YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN, I'M GOING TO MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 20 5-0 TEN, WAIVING THE DUMPSTER RENTAL FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $750. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON. DISCUSSION THE MOTION. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB. THANK YOU.

I JUST HAVE A QUICK KIND OF CLARIFICATION QUESTION OR MAYBE A SUGGESTION. I MEAN, I'M DEFINITELY IN FAVOR OF WAIVING THE FEES, BUT I JUST WONDER IF THE AMOUNT IS CORRECT BECAUSE SOMETHING YOU SAID, ALAN, IN THE PRESENTATION JUST SET OFF A LITTLE TICKLE IN MY HEAD. AND THAT IS THE FIRST DUMPSTER IS $75. THIS IS TEN DUMPSTERS. DO WE HAVE TEN DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS REQUESTING A FIRST DUMPSTER OR DO WE HAVE ONE? WE HAVE TEN INDIVIDUALS. SEPARATE INDIVIDUALS REQUESTING A FIRST DUMPSTER. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO DOUBLE CHECK ON, BECAUSE IF IT'S ONE PERSON REQUESTING TEN DUMPSTERS, IT'S 2390 304. AND I'M OKAY WAIVING THAT TOO. I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE CALLING A SPADE A SPADE.

YES. 77 INDIVIDUALS, EACH WITH THEIR FIRST DUMPSTER. TEN INDIVIDUALS. TEN. TEN. YEAH.

OKAY. COOL. THANKS. COUNCIL MEMBER BADOR I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT LAST YEAR, THIS WAS ONE OF THE FIRST TIMES AS A COUNCIL MEMBER, I WENT OUT TO A COMMUNITY EVENT. FIRST OF ALL, BEST BREAKFAST. I HAD THAT ENTIRE YEAR AND I'M LOOKING FORWARD GO JUST FOR THE BREAKFAST. AND THEN I HAD A REASON I HAD TO DUCK OUT. I HAD TO GO TO ANOTHER EVENT AFTER THAT. AND IF YOU CAN DO THAT, THAT'S GREAT BECAUSE THEN YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORK. YOU CAN JUST HAVE THE BREAKFAST. BUT THE THING I WAS MOST IMPRESSED WITH WAS JUST HOW WELL RUN THIS WAS.

I MEAN, THERE WAS A BOARD UP, EVERYONE HAD ASSIGNMENTS, EVERYONE KNEW EVERYTHING THEY HAD TO DO. AND I REMEMBER SPEAKING IN A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER AFTERWARDS SAYING THAT WE SHOULD PROBABLY MAKE THIS A SOMETHING FOR THE ENTIRE CITY AND FIND THE WAYS TO DO IT. AND WE'D HAVE A PERFECT PERSON TO PUT IN CHARGE OF IT. BUT IT WAS SO WELL DONE, SO WELL ORGANIZED.

AND NOT ONLY DID IT CLEAN UP THE AREA, BUT I KNOW THAT IT BROUGHT A LOT MORE PRIDE TO THAT AREA BECAUSE THEY DID THAT WORK. AND THAT'S EXACTLY THE KIND OF THING I WANT TO SEE HAVE HAPPEN IN THIS CITY IS A LOT MORE OF THAT, A LOT MORE OF PRIDE IN OUR CITY. AND IF YOU DO THAT WORK, IT'LL

[00:40:06]

HAPPEN. SO MY, MY HAT'S OFF TO THAT. THAT WAS REALLY JUST A MOMENT THAT IS STILL STUCK WITH ME BECAUSE OF JUST WHAT THAT MEANT TO WHAT I SAW IN THE CITY THAT I HADN'T PREVIOUSLY SEEN IN THE CITY. SO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THAT TOGETHER. THANK YOU FOR INVITING ME OUT. AND I LOOK FORWARD TO BEING THERE AGAIN. ALL RIGHT. NO OTHER COMMENTS. LET'S VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER BLOOM. YES. CHAIR. LAMB. YES. VICE CHAIR. WHITELOCK. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BADOR. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. GREEN. YES.

THANK YOU, I SHALL. THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I NOW MOVE TO A PUBLIC

[b. Ordinance No. 25-05 approves the Copper Meadows Annexation Petition, for an annexation area of approximately 1.38 acres at approximately 7339 West 8200 South.]

HEARING. B ORDINANCE NUMBER 2505, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 1.38 ACRES, APPROXIMATELY 7339 WEST 8200 SOUTH. AND WE HAVE ALEXANDRA CLEGG FROM OUR RECORDER'S OFFICE. GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. I'M HERE TO FORMALLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2505, WHICH WOULD FINALIZE THE ANNEXATION OF THE COPPER MEADOWS AREA INTO THE CITY OF WEST JORDAN ON JANUARY 14TH, 2025. THE CITY COUNCIL TOOK AN IMPORTANT STEP BY APPROVING RESOLUTION NUMBER 25 004, ACCEPTING THE ANNEXATION PETITION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. SINCE THAT TIME, ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. THE CITY REPORTER CERTIFIED THE PETITION ON FEBRUARY 3RD, 2025. FURTHERMORE, NOTICES WERE SENT OUT ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2025 TO AFFECTED ENTITIES, NEIGHBORING LANDOWNERS AND RESIDENTS. THE STATE MANDATED PROTESTS ENDED ON MARCH 5TH, 2025, AND NO FORMAL PROTESTS WERE FILED. TONIGHT, YOUR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 25, NUMBER 25, DASH OH FIVE, WILL OFFICIALLY COMPLETE THE ANNEXATION PROCESS, ALLOWING US TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FINAL LEGAL FILINGS AND COORDINATE WITH THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR'S OFFICE TO ISSUE THE ANNEXATION CERTIFICATE. THIS IS A CRITICAL STEP, AS ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED BY APRIL 30TH, 2025 FOR THE ANNEXATION TO TAKE EFFECT ON JULY 1ST, 2025. WITH ALL THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS SATISFIED AND NO PROTEST FILED, AND THE ANNEXATION ALIGNING WITH THE CITY'S LONG TERM PLANNING GOALS, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2505. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL? WE ARE SPEECHLESS. GOOD JOB. NO, I MY LIGHT'S ON. OH, GREEN. WELL, I JUST KNOW THAT WHEN YOU WERE, WHEN I WAS IN TANGYE'S OFFICE THE OTHER DAY, YOU WERE NERVOUS ABOUT THIS. YOU DID A GREAT JOB. THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU. HAD NOTHING TO BE WORRIED ABOUT. I LEARNED FROM THE BEST. SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS, WE'LL MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENT OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN FOR ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS SUBJECT. WE'VE LEFT YOU SPEECHLESS AS WELL. MR. ANDERSON, IS THERE ANYBODY ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? CHAIR, THERE ARE THREE INDIVIDUALS IN ONLINE AS ATTENDEES, NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HAND. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL MOVE TO A MOTION OR A VOTE OR BOTH. I'LL PLAY JEOPARDY AND BE THE FIRST ONE TO BUZZ IN. I'M GOING TO MOVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 25. DASH ZERO FIVE. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB.

DISCUSSION TO THE MOTION. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO DISCUSSION, LET'S VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER.

BADER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER.

GREEN. YES. CHAIR. LAMB. YES. VICE CHAIR. WHITELOCK. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BLOOM. YES.

THANK YOU. I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. THANK YOU. AND MOVE TO PUBLIC HEARING C

[c. Ordinance No. 25-06 Copper Meadows Annexation (1.38 acres) approximately 7339 West 8200 South, Future Land Use Map designation of Low-Density Residential, and Zoning map designation of P-C Zone (Planned Community)]

ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 506. COPPER MEADOWS ANNEXATION 1.38 ACRES, APPROXIMATELY 7339 WEST 800 SOUTH. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONING MAP.

DESIGNATION OF PC ZONE FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY. AND WE HAVE TAYLOR JENSEN FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. GREAT. THANK YOU CHAIR LAMB AND COUNCIL JUST FOLLOWING UP ON THAT PAST ACTION

[00:45:04]

WITH THE ANNEXATION COMING INTO THE CITY, THIS IS JUST THE NEXT STEP TO DEFINE THE FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY. SO THIS WAS PART OF THE COPPER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION. THE REST OF THAT SUBDIVISION IS ZONED PC, AND IT HAS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. SO WE'RE PROPOSING THAT WE JUST ADOPT THOSE EXACT SAME LAND USE AND ZONING FOR THIS LITTLE ANNEXATION AREA, WHICH WE CAN SEE ON THE MAP, ENCOMPASSES ABOUT TWO AND A HALF TO THREE LOTS. HAPPINESS. ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE? COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON, THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS TO GET ENOUGH OPEN SPACE IN THE DEVELOPMENT TO MEET CITY CODE FOR THE PC DEVELOPMENT. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S NOT CORRECT. THE ORIGINAL COPPER MEADOWS, THAT WAS THE PLAN. BUT AS WE CAN SEE HERE, THIS HAS A PORTION OF A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND A COUPLE OF THE LARGER LOTS WHICH ARE UP ON THE. OH YES, I SEE THAT, YES. BUT ORIGINALLY IT WAS JUST TO MEET THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT ORIGINALLY, BUT THEY MOVED THE PLANS AROUND. OKAY. VERY GOOD.

JUST MORE CURIOSITY THAN ANYTHING, BUT. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU.

TAYLOR, WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS PORTION OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR THOSE THAT ARE IN ATTENDANCE. IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK, PLEASE COME FORWARD NOW. SEEING NONE IN THE AUDIENCE. MR. ANDERSON, ARE THERE ANY ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? THERE ARE THREE, AND NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HAND. THANK YOU. CHAIR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION OR DISCUSSION. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON, I MOVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2506, COPPER MEADOWS ANNEXATION, 1.38 ACRES, APPROXIMATELY 7339 WEST AND 8200 SOUTH. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONING MAP. DESIGNATION OF PC ZONE. PLANNED COMMUNITY. AND I'LL SECOND THAT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON AND A SECOND FROM COUNCIL CHAIR LAMB. ANY DISCUSSION TO THE MOTION? SEEING NONE. LET'S VOTE. VICE CHAIR. WHITELOCK. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. GREEN. YES. CHAIR. LAMB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BLOOM. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BADOR. YES.

THANK YOU. I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THREE DOWN, THREE TO GO.

[d. Resolution No. 25-008 authorizing the Mayor’s signature of the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program Certifications and Assurances]

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE PUBLIC HEARING D RESOLUTION NUMBER 20 FIVE, DASH 008 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE OF THE EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES. AND WE HAVE A DEPUTY CHIEF ROBINSON FROM OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT TO LET US KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. THANK YOU, CHIEF ROBERTS. GOOD LOOKING ONE. APOLOGIZE, SAYS ROBERTSON ON HERE. I SURE DON'T WANT TO BE HIM. YOU KNOW WHAT? I ACTUALLY I DO, BUT NO. SO YEAH, BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS PERMISSION TO ACCEPT THIS GRANT. THIS IS THIS GRANT IS IT'S ONE THAT WE PUT IN FOR EVERY YEAR FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE. IN THIS INSTANCE, WE'RE WE WERE AWARDED ROUGHLY $44,000, WHICH WILL ENABLE US TO PURCHASE 55 BALLISTIC HELMETS WITH FACE SHIELDS. THE PURPOSE OF THOSE HELMETS IS TO JUST FURTHER BOLSTER THE RESPONSE ABILITY OF OUR PATROL OFFICERS. AND WE HAVE SPECIALIZED UNITS THAT ARE EQUIPPED TO RESPOND TO, YOU KNOW, PUBLIC, YOU KNOW, PUBLIC DISORDER INCIDENTS, SWAT TYPE INCIDENTS, THINGS LIKE THAT. BUT OUR PATROL OFFICERS LACK THE PROTECTIVE HEADGEAR IN RECENT TIME. YOU KNOW, WHILE WE HAVE THE RESOURCES, IT TAKES TIME TO BRING THEM TO BEAR. AND WE JUST WANT TO BETTER PROTECT OUR, OUR OFFICERS. AND THIS IS A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THAT ALLOWS US TO DO THAT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL? I I'M GOING TO ASK COUNCILMEMBER GREEN. HOW IS THE HOW DO I PHRASE THIS? HOW ARE THE ISSUES IN WASHINGTON DC AFFECTING THIS GRANT? IS IT GOING TO AFFECT IT AT ALL? IT DEPENDS. HOW MANY TIMES THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE NATION FLIP FLOPS. RIGHT NOW IT'S NOT. BUT OKAY, THAT COULD CHANGE. BUT SINCE YOU'RE DEDICATING THIS TO A SPECIFIC PURPOSE, IT WE'RE NOT WE'RE USING THAT AS ONE TIME FUNDS KIND OF BECAUSE WE'RE BUYING THE EQUIPMENT. SO WE'RE NOT RELYING ON THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR FOR A SALARY OR PART OF A

[00:50:04]

SALARY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. CORRECT. WE, WE PUT IN FOR THIS GRANT EVERY YEAR FOR A TARGETED PURPOSE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL. SINCE THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS, WE WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE I KNOW YOU'RE RARING TO COME UP. ALL RIGHT. NOBODY. MR. ANDERSON, ONLINE, THERE ARE THREE INDIVIDUALS ONLINE, NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HANDS. CHAIR. THANK YOU. WE WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL MOVE TO A MOTION OR DISCUSSION. VICE CHAIR WHITLOCK MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 20 5-008, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE OF THE EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM. CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES. I'LL SECOND THA.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR WHITLOCK AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN. DISCUSSION OF THE MOTION. SEEING NONE. LET'S VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BLUM. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BADER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. GREEN. YES.

CHAIR. LAMB. YES. VICE CHAIR. WHITE. LUCK. YES. THANK YOU. I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0.

[e. Ordinance No. 25-11 Station Area Plan for the 5600 West Old Bingham Highway Station]

THANK YOU. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO A PUBLIC HEARING. E ORDINANCE NUMBER 25, DASH 11, STATIONARY PLAN FOR THE 5600 WEST OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY STATION AND TAYLOR JENSEN. ROUND TWO. COME ON UP. GREAT. THANK YOU AGAIN, CHAIR. WE HAVE A COUPLE PEOPLE ONLINE FROM DESIGN WORKSHOP THAT ARE GOING TO DO MOST OF THE PRESENTATION. AND I'LL BE FLIPPING THE SLIDES. SO WE HAVE CHRIS GEDDES AND EMILY BURROWS, WHO I BELIEVE IS GOING TO BE DOING MOST OF THE PRESENTING, AND THEN I'LL CHIME IN AS NEEDED. EMILY, ARE YOU THERE? I THINK I NEED TO PROMOTE THEM.

THEY'RE ONLINE. OKAY. THEY'RE ABLE TO SPEAK. HELLO. SO WE HEAR EMILY WAS THE OTHER PERSON ONLINE AS WELL. I THINK EMILY IS GOING TO PRESENT AND CHRIS WILL JUMP IN IF HE NEEDS TO. JUST.

LET'S JUST MAKE SURE. CHRIS, ARE YOU THERE? I'M HERE. THANK YOU. OKAY, GREAT. GO AHEAD. EMILY.

AWESOME. I THINK TAYLOR'S GOING TO JUST KICK US OFF WITH JUST A BIT ABOUT THE PROJECT CONTEXT.

UNLESS YOU WANT ME TO GET STARTED ON THAT. TAYLOR. YEAH, NO, I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT.

AWESOME. SO AS THE COUNCIL IS AWARE, IN 2022, HOUSE BILL 462 REQUIRES US TO DO A STATIONARY PLAN FOR ALL OF OUR TRACK STATIONS IN THE CITY. THIS IS A FOURTH ONE. WE HAVE A TIME, A STATUTORY TIME LIMIT, TO HAVE THIS ADOPTED BY THE END OF THE YEAR. SO WE'RE WELL IN ADVANCE OF THAT. THIS IS FOR THE 5600 WEST OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY STATION AREA PLAN. THIS IS THE FURTHEST SOUTH STATION IN THE CITY. IT BORDERS SOUTH JORDAN AND ACTUALLY CROSSES THAT BORDER.

THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA IS JUST INDUSTRIAL WITHIN WEST JORDAN, AS IT DOES CROSS INTO SOUTH JORDAN. IT DOES INCORPORATE PORTIONS OF DAYBREAK, SO IT HAS SOME RESIDENTIAL AND SOME OF THAT DOWNTOWN DAYBREAK, BUT THERE ARE NO RESIDENCES IN WEST JORDAN THAT ARE INCORPORATED INTO THIS STATION AREA PLAN. AND THEN JUST TAKING A LOOK, BECAUSE IT DOES JUST CROSS INTO DAYBREAK. WE WANTED TO KIND OF TALK ABOUT SOME OF WHAT'S GOING ON THERE.

SO YOU CAN SEE THERE'S THE BASEBALL STADIUM, WHICH IF YOU'VE BEEN OUT THERE, IS NEARLY DONE. THERE'S A NEW TRACK STATION. LARRY MILLER IS DOING A BIG MEGAPLEX ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, WHICH IS KIND OF LIKE FAT CATS, BUT BIGGER. AND THEN THERE ARE CURRENTLY TWO SEVEN STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION THERE IN DAYBREAK, JUST ACROSS THE BORDER. SO THAT'S JUST TO GIVE US A LITTLE BIT OF AN IDEA OF THE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WE'RE SEEING QUARTER TO HALF MILE DOWN THE ROAD. SO AS WE TALK ABOUT THE STATIONARY PLAN AND WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING, I KNOW THAT IT'S NOT OUT OF PLACE. IT'S REALLY KIND OF FITTING IN WITH WHAT WE'RE SEEING IN DAYBREAK, AND WE SHOULDN'T FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO PULL OUR PUNCHES OR NOT BE BOLD IN THIS PLAN, BECAUSE SOUTH JORDAN IS BEING VERY BOLD JUST ADJACENT TO US. SO WE WANTED TO BRING THIS UP. AND THEN EMILY WILL TALK THROUGH THE PROJECT VISION. THANK YOU, TAYLOR, AND GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR HAVING US. SO WE'LL GO INTO THE PROJECT VISION NOW FOR THE SITE PLANNING, PROGRAMING AND ALSO HOW PEOPLE MOVE TO AND FROM THE SITE. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO WE FIRST WANTED TO FOCUS ON THE

[00:55:03]

CIRCULATION OF THE SITE WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO EVOLVING TO WHAT WILL BE MIXED USE, A HIGH DENSITY AREA, WE KNEW CIRCULATION WAS GOING TO BE A KEY COMPONENT, SO WE WANTED TO FOCUS ON CIRCULATION TO THREE KEY AREAS. NEXT SLIDE. THE FIRST AREA IS THE BRICK LINE. SO THIS WILL BE A CRUCIAL CONNECTOR THAT WILL LINK WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SITE. PLAN THE 5600 STATION TO WEST BINGHAM CREEK REGIONAL PARK ON THE EAST SIDE, AND PAYING HOMAGE TO INTERSTATE BRICK THERE. WE WANTED TO CALL THIS THE BRICK LINE. SO BY BEING THE MAIN CORRIDOR, WE WANT TO MAKE THIS AN EASY AND SAFE STREET TO NAVIGATE FOR EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY FOR PEOPLE ON BIKES AND ALSO PEDESTRIANS. SO WITH THE WITH THAT, THE BRICK LINE DESIGN WILL PRIORITIZE HAVING CROSSWALKS, TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND BIKE LANES. AND IN ADDITION TO CREATE THAT MAIN CORRIDOR HUB OF ACTIVITY, ALL LAND USE PROGRAMING WILL BE INTEGRATED ALONG THE STREET, WHICH WILL INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RECREATION, WHICH WE'LL GET INTO LATER. NEXT SLIDE. SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS AXON DIAGRAM, YOU CAN SEE THE BRICK LINE IS HIGHLIGHTED. AND AGAIN IT'LL BE THAT CRUCIAL CONNECTOR FROM THE STATION TO THE BINGHAM CREEK REGIONAL PARK. AND LINING THE STREET, YOU'LL AGAIN WILL BE THOSE MIXED USES TO CREATE THIS DESTINATION AREA. YEAH. ONE THING WE WANTED TO TALK ABOUT HERE AS WELL IS WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT EVERYTHING THAT'S HAPPENING IN DAYBREAK, LARRY H.

MILLER IS PUTTING A LOT OF MONEY INTO DOING WHAT LARRY H. MILLER DOES WELL. SO WE DON'T WANT TO COMPETE 1 TO 1 ON THEM IN THE ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. WE WANT TO HAVE DIFFERENT USES, WHICH WE CAN HAVE A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE. AND ONE OF THOSE TYPES OF THINGS WOULD BE LIKE RESTAURANTS AND POSSIBLY EVEN NIGHTLIFE, AS THOSE TYPE OF USES ARE RESTRICTED OR EVEN PROHIBITED WITHIN SOUTH JORDAN. SO THIS IS A LOCATION WHERE SOME OF THOSE USES WHICH AREN'T ALLOWED IN SOUTH JORDAN, COULD ALSO TAKE PLACE ON THE BRICK LINE AND ONE STATION ACROSS THE BORDER. SO THANK YOU. SO THIS IS A STREET SECTION OF THAT BRICK LINE AS WELL. SO YOU CAN SEE IT.

WE REALLY WANT TO EMPHASIZE SAFETY FOR MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION. SO AGAIN FOR THOSE CYCLISTS THOSE PEDESTRIANS. SO THIS WILL INCLUDE WIDE SIDEWALKS COMPLETE STREETS WITH TREES BENCHES, ART INSTALLATIONS AND AMENITY ZONES TO REALLY LIVEN UP THAT THAT AREA. AND THEN CENTER MEDIANS TO ACTIVATE THE CORRIDOR AND ENCOURAGE COMMUNITY INTERACTIONS. AND THEN ON THIS SLIDE HERE, YOU'LL SEE SOME PRECEDENT IMAGERY THAT REALLY INSPIRED US FOR THIS BRICK LINE. SO WITH THE HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE TO ACTIVATE THAT CORRIDOR, THE GROUND FLOOR WILL BE LINED WITH SHOPS, CAFES, RESTAURANTS TO ATTRACT PEOPLE TO THE AREA FROM DAY TO NIGHT. SO YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THOSE THINGS, LIKE THE RESTAURANT ROW FROM LARIMER SQUARE THERE, OR EVEN CROCKER PARK KIND OF REALLY ACTIVATES THAT STREET. AND YOU CAN SEE FROM THAT DAY TO NIGHT, THE CENTER MEDIAN WILL ALSO BE A PASEO FOR OPEN SPACE. SO WE HEARD A LOT FROM LIKE COMMONWEALTH AVENUE, AND WE TRIED TO PULL INSPIRATION FROM THAT, ALONG WITH MULTI-USE ACTIVITY SPACE SUCH AS CLAYTON LANE, WHICH CAN ALSO BE USED AS THIS NIGHT LIKE. AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, A NIGHT MARKET ACTIVATION. SO ALL THESE CONCEPTS WILL BRING TOGETHER RESIDENTS, VISITORS, BUSINESSES TO CREATE THIS ENGAGING ENVIRONMENT ALONG THIS BRICK LINE. NEXT SLIDE. THE NEXT AREA WE WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT WAS THE STATION AREA ITSELF. SO THIS WILL BE A HUB AND A VITAL CONNECTION FOR THOSE COMING TO AND FROM THE SITE, UTILIZING BOTH EITHER THE TRACK STATION OR THE BRT OR THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT THERE. AND THEN IN ADDITION, THE STATION AREA WILL BE A POTENTIAL COULD ALSO BE A POTENTIAL SUPPORT FOR POTENTIALLY JORDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT. WE I KNOW WE'VE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THEM ABOUT WHAT COULD THAT LOOK LIKE. SO WHETHER IT'S PROVIDING WAREHOUSES THAT COULD STORE EDUCATION MATERIALS SUPPLY OR IF THERE'S ANOTHER TYPE OF INDUSTRIAL USE THERE. NEXT SLIDE. SO BECAUSE OF THIS MULTIFUNCTIONAL ROLE AS A TRANSPORTATION CONNECTOR AND ALSO POTENTIALLY JORDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE ALONG THE SITE'S PLACEMENT BORDERING SOUTH JORDAN, THIS STATION AREA WILL ALSO FUNCTION KIND OF AS A TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN WEST AND SOUTH JORDAN. YEAH. IN ADDITION TO THAT, NO, AS A TRANSITION BETWEEN WEST JORDAN AND SOUTH JORDAN. BUT THE AREA AS WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IS VERY INDUSTRIAL IN NATURE RIGHT NOW. AND I KNOW MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, AS WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS, HAVE EXPRESSED A LITTLE BIT OF CONCERNS ABOUT EXPORTING INDUSTRIAL USES FROM OTHER PORTIONS OF THE CITY HERE. IS THAT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM HERE IN THE FUTURE? AND SO THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT, AND THE WAY THE PLAN IS KIND OF DESIGNED. AND EMILY WILL TALK ABOUT SOME OF THIS A LITTLE BIT LATER. BUT THE TRAX LINE ITSELF AND OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY SERVE AS LIKE THE EDGE OF THE NEW AREA AND A TRANSITION TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS, WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED TO THE NORTH AND FARTHER TO THE WEST. EVEN THE WAY THIS IS FORMULATED, YOU WOULD HAVE YOUR PARK AND RIDE, WHICH WOULD STILL FUNCTION THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE TRAX LINE, BUT THEN ALL YOUR PEDESTRIAN

[01:00:06]

ACTIVATED PORTION OF THAT WOULD BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT LINE. SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THOSE CONFLICT POINTS AS WELL, WHICH WOULD MAKE THE NEW BRICK LINE MUCH MORE WALKABLE THAN IF IT HAD THE CONFLICT POINTS. WITH THAT PARK AND RIDE TRAFFIC. SO TRYING TO BALANCE THOSE DIFFERENT NEEDS. CAN I ASK YOU REAL QUICK? I KNOW THERE WAS A TALK ABOUT CLOSING THIS TRACK STATION, BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING OUT THERE RIGHT NOW. IS THAT STILL IN TALKS, OR HAVE THEY SAID ANYTHING TO YOU GUYS ABOUT CLOSING THAT TRACK STATION? YEAH. SO WHEN THIS ORIGINALLY STARTED OUT, OUR PLAN FOR THE STATION AREA WAS KIND OF MORE OF THE SAME. AND AT THAT POINT, UTA WAS LOOKING AT JUST BEING A MAINTENANCE STATION AS WE CHANGED ROUTES AND WANTED TO LOOK AT RE-ENVISIONING OF THIS AREA. THEY TOOK THIS OFF OF THEIR LIST OF STATIONS TO POTENTIALLY CLOSE. SO RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO PLANS FROM UTA TO CLOSE THIS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, LARRY, IF I MAY. JUST REAL QUICKLY EXCUSE ME. THE USES IN THE AREA, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE'RE PRETTY CONSTRAINED TOWARD THE SOUTH AND THE AMOUNT OF LAND THAT WE HAVE THERE. AND I'M SURE ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE AWARE THAT WE'VE GOT THE BIG OVERHEAD OR ELECTRICAL LINES THAT ARE IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, WHICH ARE GOING TO REALLY IMPINGE ON THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGHER AND BETTER USES ON THIS SITE, WHICH IS WHY WE THOUGHT THAT THE STATION AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE TRACKS WOULD WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA FOR A FOR A SWAP. SO, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE CERTAINLY OTHER OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FUTURE THAT MAY HAPPEN, BUT THAT THAT ELECTRICAL EASEMENT IS GOING TO BE A AN IT'S GOING TO HAVE A BIG IMPACT ON WHAT FUTURE USES MIGHT IT HAVE OR MIGHT LOOK LIKE THERE. SO YEAH, YOU WANT TO GO TO THAT STREET SECTION. THANK YOU CHRIS. THANK YOU TAYLOR. SO AGAIN LOOKING AT THAT STREET DIAGRAM AGAIN, WE JUST REALLY WANT TO EMPHASIZE HERE THAT HOW THE STATION AREA WILL BE USED AS A TRANSIT HUB BY ALL USERS. SO LOOKING AT WHAT YOU SEE IN THE IMAGE HERE WILL INTEGRATE TRAX WILL INTEGRATE BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND ALSO MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. SO THIS PLACE WILL BE THE STATION WILL BE A PLACE WHERE PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND VEHICLES CAN ALL COEXIST TOGETHER. EXCELLENT.

THANKS. AND THEN LOOKING AT SOME OF THE PRECEDENT IMAGERY HERE, YOU CAN JUST SEE SOME EXAMPLES THAT INTEGRATE TRANSIT HUBS WITH MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION. SO THIS IS SOMETHING WE THOUGHT 56 BUS HUNDRED COULD BE ENVISIONED FOR THE FUTURE. AND THEN THE LAST KEY AREA WHICH TAYLOR STARTED TOUCHING UP ON WAS WE REALLY WANTED TO FOCUS ON OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY. SO AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, HIGHLIGHTED ON THE MAP, WE WANTED TO CREATE THIS BOLD VISION OF HOW WE CAN REVITALIZE WHAT IS CURRENTLY A HEAVILY TRAFFICKED ROAD INTO THIS WELCOMING, PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY CORRIDOR THAT CONNECTS THE SURROUNDING AREAS TO THE SITE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO LOOKING AT THIS AXON DIAGRAM, OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY CAN BE A KEY COMPONENT TO HELP EVOLVE WHAT IS CURRENTLY DOMINATED BY INDUSTRIAL USE TO INTO THE SITE'S VISION OF BEING THIS VIBRANT MIXED USE AREA, BRINGING TOGETHER COMMUNITY AND ALSO CREATING THIS HUB OF ECONOMIC GROWTH. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THEN IN THIS STREET SECTION YOU'LL SEE HOW THE FUTURE OF OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY WILL ACCOMMODATE VEHICLES BUT ALSO PROVIDE ENHANCEMENTS FOR CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS. SO WHEN WE WERE RESEARCHING THE SITE, WE LOOKED AT LIKE THE FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AND THERE WAS MARKINGS UP IN BIKE LANE THERE. SO WE REALLY WANTED TO REALLY GO ON THAT TO CREATE THIS WALKABLE BIKEABLE AREA OF BOTH BINGHAM HIGHWAY. SO THIS INCLUDES HAVING WIDE SIDEWALKS, DEDICATED BIKE LANES, CROSSWALKS, PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SAFE AND CONVENIENT ACCESS. AND AGAIN, THIS WILL HELP BRIDGE THE SEPARATING AREAS TO OUR SITE. YEAH. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE PAVEMENT FOR THE ROAD ACTUALLY WIDENS AS WELL. SO WE WILL STILL BE SERVING THOSE INDUSTRIAL USERS WHICH ARE IN THE AREA USING THAT CURRENTLY VERY NARROW TWO LANE ROAD. YOU SEE IT GOES TO A THREE LANE ROAD. SO THOSE EXISTING USERS WHICH ARE RELY ON OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY WILL FIND THE FUNCTIONALITY IMPROVED AS WELL. SO NOT ONLY IS IT GOING TO BE IMPROVED FOR CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS, BUT IT'S ALSO GOING TO SERVE OUR AUTO COMMUTERS AND INDUSTRY IN THE AREA AS WELL. AND THEN THESE ARE JUST SOME PRECEDENT IMAGES OF EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL MULTIMODAL TRANSIT WITH COMPLETE STREETS. SO YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THESE THINGS. EXAMPLES HERE. THERE'S TREE LINED ROADS. THERE'S SOME GREEN SPACES, WIDER SIDEWALKS TO ALLOW THAT ACTIVATION, AND THEN PUBLIC ART EVEN TO OR EVEN LIKE LANDSCAPING AND GARDENING TO HELP CREATE THAT SAFE AND INVITING SPACE FOR BOTH

[01:05:04]

RESIDENTS AND VISITORS, WHILE ALSO STILL ACCOMMODATING INDUSTRIAL USES ACROSS.

EXCELLENT. SO NOW WE'LL GET INTO THE ACTUAL SITE PROGRAMING. SO WHILE WE WANT TO CREATE THIS HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE DISTRICT FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, THE SITE IS BROKEN DOWN TO DIFFERENT FOCUSES. SO AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, IT'S LIKE A CENTRAL SOUTH AND NORTH. SO THE CENTER OF THE SITE WITH THE BRICK LINE WILL AGAIN BE THAT MIXED USE WITH COMMERCIAL LINE MAIN STREET. THE SOUTH BORDERING TOWARDS DAYBREAK. WE KIND OF MADE A LITTLE MORE RESIDENTIAL FOCUS, WHILE THE NORTH WILL BE A LITTLE MORE COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT FOCUSED. SO NOW WE'LL GO INTO EACH ONE OF THESE LAND USES. SO STARTING OFF WITH RETAIL, WE WANT TO SHOW OFF HOW IT'S BEING BUILT UP, FLOOR BY FLOOR BY EACH DIFFERENT LAND USE. SO WITH RETAIL WHICH IS MAINLY ON THE GROUND FLOOR, YOU SEE HERE, IT'S INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE ACTIVITY BETWEEN THE STATION AND BINGHAM CREEK REGIONAL PARK, ESPECIALLY ON THAT BRICK LINE. YOU CAN SEE IT ALL ALIGNED THERE. SO RETAIL WILL ALSO BE PRESENT ON THE NORTHERN END OF THE SITE ALONG, ALONG OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY. AND THEN WE ALSO. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WE WANTED TO PROVIDE TAKE OFFS FOR EACH LAND USE. SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE TOP OF EVERY SLIDE IT SAYS BUILD NUMBER, WHICH IS 315,000FT■!S. WE ALSO WANTED TO ADD SOME PRECEDENT IMAGERY OF HOW WE CAN ENVISION THESE RETAIL USES. SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE, THIS CAN INCLUDE FOOD AND MARKET HALL SPACES, SHOPPING HUBS OR MIXED USE WITH RETAIL ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND EITHER OFFICE OR RESIDENTIAL ABOVE. SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE DIFFERENT KINDS OF USES, WHETHER IT'S SMALLER SHOPS, THAT FOOD HALL OR EVEN LIKE A GROCERY STORE WITH RESIDENTIAL OR OFFICE ABOVE. NEXT SLIDE. THEN NEXT WE WANT TO GO INTO THE OFFICE HERE. SO TO UTILIZE THE TO UTILIZE STATION FOR THOSE WHO ARE COMING TO AND FROM THE AREA, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE HAD OFFICE USE TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. SO THE OFFICE USES WILL BE MORE FOCUSED. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE CENTER OF THE SITE, MOSTLY A LOT WITH MIXED USE BUILDINGS. NEXT SLIDE. AND AGAIN, HERE ARE SOME PRECEDENT IMAGERY WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE. SO AGAIN, CREATING THESE ACTIVE SPACES WITH OFFICE ABOVE AND RETAIL BELOW TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS GROUND LEVEL ACTIVITY ON ALL TIMES OF DAY, WHETHER THAT'S MORNING OR DURING WORK HOURS OR IN THE EVENING. EXCELLENT. AND THEN NEXT ON THE AXON, YOU CAN SEE THAT PURPLE TOWARDS THE NORTH OF THE SITE THAT WILL BE DEFINED AS ENTERTAINMENT. SO WITH THE STATIONARY PROVIDING AN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME THIS DESTINATION AREA AND KEEPING IN MIND OF LIKE SOUTH JORDAN'S DAYBREAK THAT DOWNTOWN PLAN, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS A FOCUS HERE THAT WOULD NOT COMPETE ON TAYLOR SAYING WITH THAT PLAN, BUT ALSO BE COMPLEMENTARY OR SEE OR OFFER THINGS THAT MAYBE THIS OTHER STAGE, THIS OTHER PLAN DOESN'T.

SO OUR FOCUS HERE IS TO HAVE FAMILY FOCUS AND COMPLEMENTARY ENTERTAINMENT USES. NEXT SLIDE.

SO THESE ENTERTAINMENT USES WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE YEAR ROUND FRIENDLY FAMILY FRIENDLY FAMILY FRIENDLY ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDED, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THESE IMAGES HERE, AN INDOOR WATER PARK AND GO KART AREA OR ARCADE CENTER. AND THEN WE ACTUALLY HAD HEAVILY DISCUSSED DURING THE DESIGN CHARRETTE IN JUNE, POTENTIALLY A YOUTH HOCKEY TRAINING CENTER AND CAMP, ESPECIALLY WITH EVERYTHING GOING ON IN THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN UTAH. THIS EVERYONE THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A GREAT WAY TO KIND OF COMPLEMENT THAT. YEAH. AND ON THAT SOCCER OR SORRY ON THAT HOCKEY. JUNIOR JAZZ IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM IN THE NATION WITH UTAH HOCKEY CLUB. WHENEVER THEIR NEW NAME IS GOING TO BE, IT MAKES SENSE THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE THERE'S GOING TO BE THAT SIMILAR DESIRE FOR YOUTH HOCKEY IN THE STATE AS WELL. WE HAVE THE POPULATION THAT'S YOUNG AND COULD TAKE UP ON THAT, BUT HOCKEY FACILITIES DON'T EXIST REALLY. IN THE VALLEY THERE'S 1 OR 2. SO A PLACE THAT COULD SERVE AS A YOUTH HOCKEY CENTER COULD REALLY BE POPULAR TO MODEL THAT JUNIOR JAZZ PROGRAM ON AND BRING PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE STATE AND VALLEY HERE TO WEST JORDAN TO THIS SITE. SO SORRY TO CUT YOU OFF, CHRIS. NO WORRIES.

I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT, YOU KNOW, ENTERTAINMENT IS SOMETHING THAT REALLY IS MORE IT'S A RECRUITMENT TOOL FOR WEST GEORGIA TO LOOK AT. SO THINKING ABOUT HOW DO WE HOW DO WE MAKE THIS PLACE A PLACE WE WANT IT TO BE, AND GOING OUT THERE AND FINDING THOSE USERS. SO IF IT'S IF IT'S YOUTH HOCKEY OR WATER SPORTS FACILITY, WHATEVER IT IS, I THINK DEFINING THAT, THAT THAT DESTINATION IDEA THAT WEST JORDAN WANTS TO, YOU KNOW, TAG ON TO AND GOING OUT AND RECRUITING THAT IS GOING TO BE YOUR BEST BET IN, IN MAKING SURE THAT THIS PLACE BECOMES WHAT YOU WANT IT TO BE. THANK YOU CHRIS. THANK YOU TAYLOR. SO TO ACCOMMODATE THE ENTERTAINMENT

[01:10:08]

USES, WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS HOTELS. IT'S THAT LIGHT PINK YOU SEE TOWARDS THE NORTH. SO WITH ACCESS TO MOUNTAIN VIEW WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS HOSPITALITY FOR THE SITE AREA AS WELL. NEXT SLIDE. SO THE HOTEL WE MADE A VARIETY OF HOTEL OPTIONS. SO YOU CAN SEE THE PRESIDENT IMAGERY. SO THEY CAN RANGE FROM SMALLER TO LARGER HOTELS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. AND SOMETHING WE HEARD DURING THE PROCESS. I THINK WE EVEN HEARD A LITTLE BIT OF IT TONIGHT WAS CONFERENCE CENTER. SO THERE'S ENOUGH HOTEL ROOMS HERE WHERE YOU COULD HAVE A CONFERENCE CENTER. ONE OF MY OTHER ROLES, I'M ON THE BOARD FOR APA, UTAH, AND IN LOOKING FOR A CONFERENCE CENTER FOR THOSE THOSE BY YEAR OR SEMIANNUAL MEETINGS, THERE'S REALLY NOT THAT MANY CENTERS OUTSIDE OF SALT LAKE CITY. AND SO THAT'S A USE THAT WE FEEL LIKE THERE IS A NEED FOR. AND THIS COULD ALSO SERVE THAT NICHE AS WELL. AND THEN FOR THE INDUSTRIAL USES, AGAIN, WE'VE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE JORDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT ABOUT RELOCATING POTENTIALLY RELOCATING THEIR WAREHOUSES FROM CITY CENTER TO 5600 WEST. SO THAT DARK GRAY BUILDING ON THE AXON THAT WOULD PROVIDE THAT INDUSTRIAL SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE.

AND THEN, IN ADDITION, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT LAND NORTH OF OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY WILL REMAIN INDUSTRIAL. SO JUST TO KIND OF. KEEP THAT THERE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THEN LASTLY, WE WANTED TO TOUCH ON RESIDENTIAL. SO AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE YELLOW ON THE AXON THIS WILL SUPPORT RESIDENTS LIVING IN THIS MIXED USE AREA. SO YOU CAN SEE IN THE CALL OUT A VARIETY OF OPTIONS FOR DENSITIES. SO IN THE STATION AREA YOU CAN SEE THAT IT HAS THE HIGHEST DENSITY OF UP TO TEN FLOORS. AND THAT HIGHEST DENSITY WILL CONTINUE ON THE CENTER OF THE SITE ON THE BRICK LINE TOWARDS BINGHAM CREEK REGIONAL PARK. AND THEN WE COULD ALSO POTENTIALLY HAVE MEDIUM DENSITY THERE. SO WE JUST WANTED TO SHOW THAT TOWARDS THE SOUTHERN END. BUT THIS COULD ALSO BE HIGHER DENSITY AS WELL. SO MEDIUMS TEND TO BE FOUR FLOORS, BUT IT COULD ALSO INCREASE IF NEEDED AS WELL.

WE ALSO WANTED TO POINT OUT HERE THAT GRASS AREA TOWARDS THE NORTH EAST PART OF THAT SITE, THAT IS, BEFORE YOU HIT BINGHAM CREEK REGIONAL PARK, THAT GRASS AREA, WE KNOW THAT THIS COULD POTENTIALLY TURN INTO LIVE WORK UNITS. SO WE JUST WANT TO PUT THAT THERE TO THAT. THAT SITE COULD ALSO BE DEVELOPED BESIDES JUST LEAVING IT AS AN OPEN SPACE. YEAH. AND THAT'S NOT ON THE DRAWINGS BECAUSE IT IS TECHNICALLY OUT OF THE STATIONARY PLAN. BUT WE'RE THINKING OF WAYS HOW WOULD THIS TRANSITION TO SOME OF THOSE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, BECAUSE WE MENTIONED THERE'S NO WEST JORDAN RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE STATION, BUT THAT'S PRETTY CLOSE. AND SO WE THOUGHT WITH THAT BEING A COMMERCIAL AREA UP IN THE NORTH, HAVING SOME SORT OF LIVE WORK UNIT WOULD BE A WAY TO TRANSITION FROM THAT SINGLE FAMILY TO MORE OF THE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. AS WE MOVE THERE TO THE WEST. THANK YOU. AND THEN HERE'S AGAIN, JUST SOME POSITIVE INJURY. AGAIN, WITH THOSE DIFFERENT RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES CAN LOOK LIKE WHETHER IT'S LIKE A MEDIUM OR HIGH DENSITY, DEPENDING ON WHERE IN THE SITE WE WANT TO PUT THAT. THANK YOU. AND THE NEXT SLIDE. AND SO OVERALL AGAIN HERE'S JUST A RECAP WITH THE ENTIRE AXON AND ALL THE LAND USES AND SQUARE FOOTAGES HERE. SORRY. AND THEN WE CONDUCTED A PUBLIC SURVEY FROM OCTOBER 13TH TO NOVEMBER OCTOBER 23RD SORRY TO NOVEMBER 13TH AND GATHERED A TOTAL OF 166 RESPONSES. SO THANK YOU, TAYLOR AND WEST JORDAN FOR GETTING THAT SURVEY OUT THERE. WE RECEIVED A LOT OF SURVEY RESPONSES, AND OVERALL THE RESPONDENTS WERE SUPPORTIVE OF MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, ENTERTAINMENT VENUES AND IMPROVED COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS. THEY DID HIGHLIGHT SOME CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC, PARKING SAFETY AND STRESSING THE NEED TO HAVE THAT BALANCE AND THOUGHTFUL GROWTH. SO I THINK WITH OUR PLAN TODAY, WE REALLY TRIED TO ADDRESS ALL THESE CONCERNS WITH ESPECIALLY SAFETY AND TRAFFIC AND HOW TO HOW DOES EVERYONE MOVE TO AND FROM THAT SITE. AND SO THAT KIND OF IS THE END OF OUR PRESENTATION. BUT ME, EMILY AND CHRIS, WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. BYRON WITH WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL WAS HERE AS WELL IN THE AUDIENCE AND HAVING SOME QUESTIONS. YOU, AS THE COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, THANK YOU. THE STATION AREA PLAN EXTENDS INTO SOUTH JORDAN. ARE THEY GOING? THEY DIDN'T PARTICIPATE IN THIS. ARE THEY GOING TO DO THEIR OWN FOR THAT LITTLE SECTION, OR ARE WE JUST DOING THAT? AND THE FACT THAT THERE'S THAT LITTLE NO MAN'S LAND FROM

[01:15:04]

WEST JORDAN TO SOME OF THE SOUTH JORDAN RESIDENTIAL THAT IT'S JUST GOING TO NOT BE ANYTHING.

YEAH, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO A STATIONARY PLAN FOR THE STATION. THEY'RE GOING TO USE THEIR DOWNTOWN DAYBREAK PLAN AND JUST HAVE THAT CERTIFIED. OKAY. AND THEN MY LAST AND THEN I JUST HAVE A COMMENT THAT BRICK LINE ROAD, I'M OKAY IF IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY CARS ON IT. YOU KNOW, YOU GO TO LIKE WATER STREET AND CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, THAT AS WE START TO IMPLEMENT THAT, I'M AND I THINK DENVER'S GOT A COUPLE OF STREETS THAT ARE BLOCKED OFF JUST LIKE THAT. I'D BE OKAY WITH SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND NOT HAVE TO HAVE CARS RUN DOWN THAT STREET. SO JUST A THOUGHT. OKAY. THANK. YOU, COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON. I'LL START OFF BY ECHOING COUNCILMEMBER GREEN. I DON'T I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT BRICK LINE ROAD NEEDS CARS ON IT. I THINK IT'D BE FABULOUS TO HAVE IT BE A PEDESTRIAN ZONE. THE QUESTION THAT I HAVE THAT'S JUST BURNING IS, AND I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU COULD ANSWER IT, BUT HOW LONG UNTIL THIS ONE. HOW LONG UNTIL WE COULD ACTUALLY START THIS? HOW LONG UNTIL IT'S ACTUALLY COULD BE DONE? ARE WE TALKING DECADES BEFORE IT BEGINS OR. OKAY, I THINK CORBIN'S GOING TO ANSWER THAT PART, BUT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE ROADS FIRST, BECAUSE THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE DID HEAR DURING OUR PROCESS.

IT'S SOMETHING WE REALLY LOOKED AT. BUT BECAUSE OF THE TRACK LINE, WE HAVE TO CROSS THAT TRACK LINE. ACCESS INTO THE SITE IS VERY LIMITED ACROSS THE TRAIN TRACKS. AND SO TO HAVE THE CIRCULATION WORK, WE DO HAVE TO HAVE SOME MODE OF AUTOMOBILES ON THAT ROAD. WE COULD POTENTIALLY DO SOMETHING LIKE THEY DO IN PORTIONS OF DENVER OR EVEN WATER STREET IN HENDERSON, IS THERE'S POSSIBILITY THAT WE COULD HAVE GATES AND WE COULD CLOSE THE ROAD OFF DURING FESTIVAL TIMES.

AND NOW SALT LAKE DOES THAT WITH THEIR OPEN STREETS AS WELL. SO WE REALLY TRIED TO GET AWAY FROM AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC ON THAT ROAD, BUT TO KEEP THAT CIRCULATION FAST BUS WITH UTA'S ALSO GOING TO COME IN HERE. WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WEREN'T GRIDLOCKING THIS WHOLE AREA OR LOCKING IT OUT BY NOT HAVING THAT KEY CONNECTION. ON CORBIN. AS FAR AS TIMELINES, IT'S VERY HARD TO PREDICT. WE HAVE MET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND SHOWED THEM THIS PLAN. YOU KNOW, THIS STATIONARY PLAN MORE THAN THE OTHERS WE'VE DONE. THIS STATIONARY PLAN IS HIGHLY RELIANT ON ONE LARGE SINGLE PROPERTY OWNER. IT MAKES IT VERY, VERY EXCITING BECAUSE WHEN THAT PROPERTY OWNER DECIDES IT'S TIME TO RELOCATE AND REINVEST, THIS CAN HAPPEN RATHER QUICKLY.

THEY ARE UNSURE OF THEIR THEIR NEXT MOVE, WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO REINVEST IN IN THEIR CURRENT SITE RIGHT NOW, OR CONSIDER A POSSIBLE NEW SITE. SO IT REALLY DEPENDS ON WHETHER THEY CHOOSE TO REINVEST IN THEIR CURRENT FACTORY AT THE MOMENT. IF SO, IT PROBABLY PUSHES THE RE THE REALIZATION OF THIS PLAN OFF 20 YEARS. HOWEVER, THEY ARE AT AN INFLECTION POINT WHERE THEY EITHER NEED TO REINVEST AND REBUILD THEIR FACTORY TO BRING IT UP TO MODERN STANDARDS ON THE CURRENT SITE OR OR RELOCATE AND REINVEST AT A NEW SITE. SO THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO CONSIDER THIS STATION AREA, PLAN FOR THEM AND SHOW THEM WHAT OUR VISION IS FOR THE SITE. COUNCIL MEMBER BLOOM I HAD A SIMILAR QUESTION ABOUT THAT EXPECTED TIMELINE, SO I'M GLAD YOU ALSO ASKED THAT. OTHER QUESTIONS. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY GOING TO INCREASE THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION NEAR THAT STATION.

ALSO, PARKING IS HOW WILL PARKING DEMAND EXCEED THAT SUPPLY THERE BECAUSE I DON'T SEE A LOT OF PARKING. AND THEN SHOULD PARKING FEES OR REGULATIONS BE CONSIDERED TO PREVENT OVERFLOW PARKING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS? BECAUSE I CAN ABSOLUTELY SEE THAT HAPPENING. AND THEN MY FINAL QUESTION, IS THERE A GOAL PERCENTAGE OF THE 3000 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS WHICH WOULD WHICH CAN BE WILL BE DESIGNATED AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING? SO I KNOW FOR PARKING SPECIFICALLY THE EVALUATION, AND CHRIS PROBABLY KNOWS MORE ABOUT THIS, BUT WE HAD GALLOWAY LOOK AT THE PARKING COUNTS. THEY ARE LOOKING AT SHARED PARKING BETWEEN THE OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES. THERE ARE THERE ARE STRUCTURES THERE. WE EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED PARKING BY ULI, THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE. BUT PARKING IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE CONCERNED. I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE EVALUATED ONGOING AS THE PROJECT HAPPENS. TAYLOR I CAN ADDRESS THAT A LITTLE, IF YOU DON'T MIND. BASED ON CURRENT NUMBERS, WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT

[01:20:07]

THAT STRUCTURED PARKING IS GOING TO BE NECESSARY FOR USES OUTSIDE OF RESIDENTIAL. SO WE WE'RE SHOWING MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THOSE WOULD BE ALL BE STRUCTURED PARKS. AND WE THINK THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT THE MARKET IS GOING TO BEAR. AND BUT WHEN IT COMES TO OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL IT'S A TOUGHER MARKET. RIGHT. SO THIS IS A WAG WHAT YOU SEE HERE. THIS IS NOT A DEPICTION OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE. AND I THINK THAT'S THE IMPORTANT THING TO PUT FORWARD HERE IS ARE WE COMFORTABLE WITH WITH THE IDEAS OF THE BRICK LINE AND DENSITY? YOU AS A CITY WILL BUILD IN YOUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS? THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MARKET REQUIRE THE DEVELOPER TO GO TO STRUCTURED PARKING. THEN THAT'S WHAT WILL HAPPEN. BUT WE'RE TRYING TO TAKE WHAT WE THINK THE FUTURE, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEXT 20 YEARS LOOKS LIKE. AND AGAIN, BEYOND ANYTHING, BEYOND FIVE YEARS REALLY JUST KIND OF OKAY, SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE IS NOT SHOW SOMETHING THAT'S LIKE OVERDEVELOPED SO THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO SELL THIS TO SOMEBODY, THEY'RE LIKE, THAT'S NOT GOING TO WORK HERE. BUT YOU KNOW, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, PROTECT YOUR, YOUR INTERESTS AND MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY THAT YOU WANT TO BRING HERE. SO NOT EVERYTHING IN. IS GOING TO BE STRUCTURED PARKS IN THE FUTURE, BUT SOME OF IT WILL. AND SO JUST PROTECTING YOUR INTEREST HERE IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO. YEAH. AND THEN ON THE LAST PART OF YOUR QUESTION, COUNCIL MEMBER, ABOUT WHAT THE PORTION OF IT THAT'S GOING TO BE ATTAINABLE OR AFFORDABLE OR MODERATE INCOME HOUSING, I THINK THERE'S DIFFERENT FUNDING MECHANISMS AND THE DIFFERENT FUNDING MECHANISMS THAT ANY DEVELOPER WILL USE WILL STIPULATE WHAT THOSE ARE. ONE OF THE PURPOSES FOR THE STATIONARY PLANS IS NOT ONLY TO INCREASE HOUSING NEXT TO THE STATIONS, BUT TO PROVIDE SOME OF THAT. SO I'M SURE THERE WILL BE A MODERATE INCOME HOUSING COMPONENT TO THOSE. DO WE HAVE THAT SPELLED OUT THE PERCENTAGES RIGHT NOW? WE DO NOT. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW QUICK THOUGHT ON THE BRICK LINE, BECAUSE I AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE NICE IF WE HAD NO CARS ON IT. CAN WE, SINCE WE'RE DESIGNING THIS FROM SCRATCH, CAN WE PUT A ROAD THAT IS THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE ROAD FOR YOUR CAR AND THEN ALSO BUILD A BRICK LINE THAT DOESN'T NEED TO BE HAVE CARS ON IT SO THAT WE CAN WE CAN EVEN LOOK AT DOING I MEAN, IT'S IT DOESN'T SEEM THAT OUT OF THE ORDINARY TO PUT A ROAD SOMEWHERE ELSE THAT COULD BE THE THROUGH LINE AND THEN ONE THAT IS JUST A WALKABLE AREA THAT KEEPS THAT THROUGH. SO I'D LIKE TO PUT THAT OUT THERE AS A THOUGHT. I'D ALSO LIKE TO US TO LOOK AT WE TALKED ABOUT YOU OPENED UP BY TALKING ABOUT THE, YOU KNOW, THE VERY VANILLA ENTERTAINMENT THAT WILL BE AT SOUTH JORDAN AND HOW WE CAN OFFER MORE OVER HERE. BUT THEN I LOOKED AT OUR ENTERTAINMENT CENTER THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT AND THE ENTERTAINMENT PROVIDED, AND IT'S ALL FAMILY STUFF. I LOVE FAMILY STUFF, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US LOOKING AT ENTERTAINMENT THAT IS MORE THAN JUST WHEN WE'RE SAYING BARS AND RESTAURANT THAT THAT'S, YOU KNOW, MORE ADULT CENTERED ENTERTAINMENT. AND I'M NOT SAYING A RED LIGHT DISTRICT. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THERE ARE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE THAT ADULTS LIKE TO DO WITHOUT, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT JUST KIDS AROUND. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE WATERSLIDES, BUT WE CAN HAVE COOL AREAS. THERE'S A PLACE I VERY MUCH ENJOY IN LAS VEGAS CALLED AREA 15. THAT IS A BIG WAREHOUSEY THING THAT'S JUST FULL OF IT'S GOT BARS, IT'S GOT RESTAURANTS, BUT IT'S ALSO GOT GOLF SIMULATORS, AX THROWING, IT'S GOT CRAZY LITTLE MUSEUMS. IT'S GOT ARCADES THAT ARE MORE TAILORED, IT'S GOT ACTIVITIES, BUT THEY'RE NOT. YEAH, QUOTE UNQUOTE FAMILY. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE SURE IF WE'RE GOING TO SAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE SOMETHING ALTERNATIVE, IT'S THAT WE'RE PROVIDING SOMETHING THAT THAT IS MORE LANDMARK AND NOT JUST, YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT WE'VE GOT BARS AND RESTAURANTS. SO WE'RE CATERING TO ADULTS. SURE. SO IN THE LARGER DOCUMENT, THE ACTUAL LIKE 62 STATE PAGE STATIONARY PLAN, WE DO REFERENCE. ACTUALLY AREA 15 IS ONE OF THE PRECEDENT SITES. I'M TRYING NOT TO LIKE NAME PLACES BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW IS IT GOING TO COME IN, BUT OTHER TYPES OF USES THAT WE'VE LOOKED AT WHICH WOULD BE COOL AND UNIQUE OR SOMETHING LIKE MEOW WOLF? YEP. NO. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A MEOW WOLF HERE. WE DON'T WANT TO SAY THAT AND SAY, OH, THEY'RE GOING TO COME HERE. BUT USES LIKE THAT ARE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE HERE AS WELL. THOSE, THOSE ENTERTAINMENT BOXES ARE DEFINITELY BIG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT ANY OF THOSE. AND WE WANT TO BE REALLY CAREFUL TO NOT PAINT THE CITY INTO A CORNER. SO WE WERE

[01:25:04]

TRYING TO GIVE YOU, AS A COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EVERYONE THE CHANCE TO HAVE BOXES WHICH THEY COULD FILL WITH REALLY COOL USES WITHIN THE STATIONARY PLAN AND HOW THAT'S COMING AND SAYING I TAYLOR, I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE THIS THAT'S THE ONE AND ONLY USE THAT WE CAN HAVE. WELL I BOB BADER WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT HAPPEN. SO. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB THANK YOU. JUST A SUGGESTION WITH WHAT'S BEEN BANDIED ABOUT ON THE ON THE BRICK LINE, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO HEAD BACK TO THE TO THE CROSS SECTION OF THE ROAD. THERE YOU GO. IT'S GOT, YOU KNOW, 24FT WIDTH AS THE AS THAT CENTER MEDIAN. AND THEN ON THE NEXT SLIDE YOU SHOWED, YOU KNOW, AN EXAMPLE OF COMMONWEALTH AVENUE WHERE THAT PATH DOWN THE CENTER IS 24FT WIDE OR 18FT WIDE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS, BUT PRETTY CLOSE TO ALL OF IT THAT, YOU KNOW, IT'S SAYING, YOU'RE SAYING HERE'S, HERE'S, HERE'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO. IT'S, IT'S ORANGES. AND WE'VE ONLY GOT ROOM FOR A GRAPE, YOU KNOW, PUT ON THE, PUT ON THE PLAN. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY, LESS AUTO FOCUSED. IF WE GO BACK NOW TO THE TO THE CROSS SECTION, PUSH PUSH THE CARS MAYBE TO ONE SIDE AND HAVE A TWO LANE BACK AND FORTH OR EVEN A TWO LANE AND A CENTER TURN LANE OR WHATEVER ON ONE SIDE, AND HAVE A WIDE, LINEAR, 100 FOOT WIDE PARK, GO UP AND DOWN THE MIDDLE. AND THEN AND THEN YOU'VE GOT KIND OF THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS, RIGHT? YOU'VE GOT YOUR VEHICLE CIRCULATION, BUT THEN YOU'VE ALSO GOT YOUR YOUR PEDESTRIAN PLAZA, WHICH I THINK IS KIND OF THE IDEA THERE. RIGHT. ALL THOSE INSPIRATIONAL SLIDES, YOU KNOW, ON THE ON THE NEXT PAGE WHERE WE'RE VERY WE'RE VERY PEDESTRIAN FOCUSED. VERY PLACE, IDENTITY, YOU KNOW, ACTIVE, FOCUSED AND NOT SO MUCH JUST TRAFFIC. THIS IS A LOT MORE TRAFFIC. SO IF WE PUT MAKE IT WIDER, PUT SOME OF THE BUILDINGS BACK A LITTLE FURTHER. WHATEVER YOU GOTTA DO. LIKE LIKE WAS MENTIONED WE'RE CREATING THIS FROM WHOLE CLOTH. WE MIGHT AS WELL CREATE WHAT WE WANT RIGHT. SO MIGHT AS WELL LET'S, LET'S, LET'S JUST GET IT GET IT THE WAY. THAT WOULD BE REALLY COOL. INSTEAD OF JUST THE WAY WE THINK WE SHOULD TRY TO GET AWAY WITH. LET'S DO THE DO THE BIG THING. SO. AND IF I MAY, IF I MAY, YOU KNOW, THE POINT IS VERY WELL TAKEN. AND I THINK, AGAIN, THIS IS THIS IS, THIS IS A WAG. WE, WE BELIEVE THAT THIS STREET NEEDS TO BE A PLACE FOR PEDESTRIANS, NEEDS TO BE A PLACE FOR COMMERCE. AND COMMERCE, YOU KNOW, DOES REQUIRE SOME, SOME, YOU KNOW, CARS TO BE ABLE TO SEE THEIR STOREFRONTS. BUT THIS IS NOT THE END ALL, BE ALL. THIS IS A THIS IS A STATIONARY PLAN.

IT'S A MASTER PLAN. AND WHEN SOMEBODY COMES TO YOU WHEN INTERSTATE OR SOMEBODY THAT THEY SELL TO COMES TO YOU AND SAYS, HERE'S OUR VISION FOR THIS, YOU CAN SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT? WE HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION ABOUT THIS. THE ONE THING I WOULD SAY IS SCALE IS IMPORTANT. AND IF YOU LOOK AT PLACES LIKE COMMONWEALTH, IF YOU LOOK AT PLACES, YOU KNOW, THESE GREAT STREETS, THAT, THAT SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT VERSUS THE SCALE OF THE PEDESTRIAN PUBLIC REALM IS IMPORTANT. SO IN THIS SCHEME, YOU HAD TWO STORY BUILDINGS ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS, THE STREET.

IT WOULDN'T FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THAT ENCLOSED SPACE. BUT IF YOU GO INTO 5 OR 6 STORIES, YOU CAN START TO DO THINGS THAT YOU KNOW, YOU REALLY YOU CAN CREATE, YOU KNOW, THIS, THIS FANTASTIC PLACE FOR WESTWORD THAT NOBODY ELSE HAS IN UTAH. SO I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE THE COUNCIL, AS YOU THINK ABOUT THIS IN THE FUTURE, AND YOU'RE LOOKING AT WHAT THE VISION IS, MAKE SURE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND HOW THE PUBLIC SPACE COMES TOGETHER.

MAKE SURE YOU GIVE THE SPACE TO THE PEDESTRIANS THAT YOU WANT TO. MAKE SURE THAT YOU'VE GOT EYES ON THE STOREFRONTS. BUT THIS IS NOT THE LAST PASS. THIS IS THIS IS A FIRST WAY. AND THERE'S A LOT MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOU TO WEIGH ON THIS IN THE FUTURE. ALL RIGHT. ANY MORE FROM YOUR TEAM, TAYLOR? WE'RE GOOD. IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR US. I KNOW WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING, SO. OKAY, WELL, IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE FROM YOU, I THINK WE'VE HAD ALL OUR QUESTIONS FROM HERE. WE WILL MOVE FORWARD THEN. THANK YOU. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU WERE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK,

[01:30:01]

PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME. WE DO HAVE ONE CITIZEN. PLEASE COME FORWARD. DO WE KNOW HIM? ACCOUNTABLE? MY NAME IS ROB BENNETT. I'M A RESIDENT OF WEST JORDAN. I JUST WANTED TO EXPRESS MY APPRECIATION FOR THIS EVOLVING PLAN. IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS. IT'S GOING TO REMAIN A WORK IN PROGRESS FOR WHO KNOWS HOW MANY YEARS. BUT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I THINK THAT THE CITIZENS OF WEST JORDAN WILL BE ABLE TO GET BEHIND, AND WE'LL BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE THE BENEFIT TO THEIR FAMILIES AND TO THEIR CHILDREN AND TO THEIR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN AS THIS ACTUALLY COMES TO FRUITION. I JUST CONCEPTUALIZE THINK OF MY WIFE AND I GETTING IN OUR CAR AND DRIVING TO THE WEST SIDE AND BEING ABLE TO SIT DOWN IN MAYBE A FOUR STAR OR A FIVE STAR RESTAURANT AND HAVE WEST JORDAN BE KNOWN FOR THAT AND HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE PEOPLE COME AND PARTICIPATE FROM ALL OVER THE VALLEY AND FARTHER AWAY AS THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PRESENTED TO THEM. I THINK THAT THE LEADERSHIP THAT THE COUNCIL WILL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE IN ESTABLISHING THIS OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY TO GROW AND MOVE FORWARD IS PHENOMENAL. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ONCE IN A LIFETIME OPPORTUNITIES THAT WILL HAVE A DIRECT IMPLICATION FOR ALL OF YOUR DESCENDANTS THAT COME AFTER YOU. SO AS A CITIZEN, I AM TOTALLY BEHIND THIS IDEA. I THINK THAT THERE'S A LOT OF BENEFIT THAT WILL COME TO THE CITY OVERALL FROM IT, AND I ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK AT IT WITH REALLY GOOD, BALANCED VISION AS IT COMES TIME TO MAKING HARD DECISIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. ANDERSON. DO WE HAVE ANY ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? YOU HAVE FOUR INDIVIDUALS ON LINE, NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HANDS TO SPEAK. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. WE WILL THEN CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS IN THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL MOVE TO A MOTION OR DISCUSSION. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, I JUST HAD ONE COMMENT. ROB, I DON'T WANT TO HAVE YOU GET IN A CAR AND DRIVE OUT THERE. WHAT I WANT YOU TO DO IS DRIVE TO YOUR NEAREST TRACK STATION, AND THAT WE HAVE A FREE FARE ZONE, THAT YOU CAN GO OUT THERE AND DINE AT A FOUR STAR, FIVE STAR RESTAURANT. HOW'S THAT? YEAH. SO OR BIKE AS THE MAYOR WOULD HAVE YOU. SO THAT WAS MY ONLY COMMENT IS I JUST I REALLY WOULD AS WE AS THE UTA AS WE PARTNER WITH UT TODAY, WE NEED TO WORK HAND IN HAND WITH THEM SO THAT IF THERE ARE EVENTS OR THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT WE CAN HAVE FREE FARE ZONES AND WHAT WEST JORDAN I MEAN, WE HAVE AS MANY TRAX STATIONS IN WEST JORDAN AS I THINK SALT LAKE CITY IS THE ONLY CITY THAT'S GOT MORE TRAX STATIONS THAN US. IF I IF I UNDERSTAND THE MAP AND SO WE THAT THAT'S ONE THING THAT AS WE TALKED AND WORK MEETING AND COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND SOME OF THE OTHER STUFF IS THAT'S ONE THING THAT WE REALLY NEED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF AS WE DEAL WITH THESE STATION AREA PLANS, IS HOW WE USE THAT TRACK STATION, THOSE TRAX LINES TO BRING PEOPLE TO THE CITY. AND IF THEY'RE TAKING THEM TO DAYBREAK FOR THE BASEBALL, WE WANT THEM TO GET OFF HERE BEFORE THEY GO TO BASEBALL OR AFTER THEY COME FROM BASEBALL, OR THEY WENT TO A BASEBALL GAME AND THEY SAID, WOW, THERE'S SOME OTHER PLACES THERE, AND THEY COME BACK. THAT'S THAT. THAT'S WHAT I WOULD LOVE TO SEE WITH, WITH THIS OCCUR. AND I THINK WE'RE ON THE RIGHT TRACK. I THINK THIS IS A GOOD CONCEPT. BY THE TIME WE'RE DONE, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE EXACTLY THIS. BUT I THINK WE HAVE THE CONCEPT OF WHAT WE WANT TO DO. AND I THINK THE BEST THING THAT CAME OUT OF THAT, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IS THAT WEST JORDAN IS NOT GOING TO BE A MAINTENANCE YARD FOR THE TRACK STATIONS AND HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT ISSUE. WE WERE BOLD ENOUGH TO SAY WE WANT A PLAN. AND HOPEFULLY, I MEAN, IF YOU SEE THIS PLAN, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 3115 UNITS WHERE PEOPLE CAN LIVE. AND THE MESSAGE THAT I ALSO WANT TO SEND IS TO A CERTAIN BODY THAT JUST.

ADJOURNED THAT CITIES ARE WILLING TO STEP UP AND SOLVE THE AND HELP WITH THE HOUSING PROBLEM. GETTING SOMETHING LIKE THIS WITH A MAJOR LANDOWNER AND OTHER THINGS WILL BE DIFFICULT.

BUT WHAT THIS MESSAGE SAYS, THE WHAT THIS ALSO SAYS IS WE ARE NOT AFRAID IN THIS CITY TO ENTITLE THE RIGHT UNITS IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME. AND CONTRARY TO SOME PRESS AND

[01:35:04]

OTHER THINGS THAT GET SOLD, WE ARE THERE. WE ARE STEPPING UP WITH THIS STATION AREA PLAN WITH THE CITY CENTER STATION AREA PLAN, WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH MIDVALE ON GARDNER VILLAGE AND BINGHAM JUNCTION STATION. WE'VE COME UP WITH SOME WITH SOME GREAT IDEAS AND HOPEFULLY PEOPLE WILL SEE THAT IT'S NOT THE CITY'S AND IT'S NOT WEST JORDAN CITY. THAT IS THE HINDRANCE AND THAT THE PLACE THAT WHERE WE NEED HELP IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WILL HELP THESE STATION AREA PLANS GO FORWARD. SO I'LL GET OFF MY SOAPBOX NOW.

THANK YOU. COUNT VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK. THANK YOU. I WANT TO THANK TAYLOR AND TEAM. IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME. YOU'VE COME BEFORE THIS BODY MULTIPLE TIMES FOR THIS. AND NOW WE HAVE SOME GREAT STATION AREA PLANS. AND SO THAT THE RESIDENTS UNDERSTAND. NOW IT'S KIND OF UP TO PROPERTY OWNERS THAT THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY GET TO CHOOSE WHAT THEY'RE DOING WITH THEIR EXISTING PROPERTY.

AND THEN DEVELOPERS GET TO COME IN AND PARTNER WITH US. AND THERE'S STILL A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY AND WHOEVER FILLS THESE SEATS TO WORK ON, ON WHAT OCCURS THERE.

BUT WE HAVE A GREAT BASE AND I APPRECIATE YOUR WORK. AND NO MORE LIGHTS, SO I'LL GIVE YOU A MOTION IF YOU'D LIKE. I WANT TO APPROVE. I MOVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2511 STATION AREA PLAN FOR THE 5600 WEST OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY STATION. I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL CHAIR LAMB. DISCUSSION OF THE MOTION. I THINK WE'VE HAD LOTS OF DISCUSSION, SO LET'S VOTE. CHAIR LAMB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER BEDAU. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. GREEN. YES. VICE CHAIR. WHITELOCK. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BLOOM. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER.

JACOB. SURE. COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. THANK YOU. I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. ALL

[f. Ordinance No. 25-10 amending City Code Section 13-8-23(B) regarding Balanced Housing, and to enact a new article 13-5O Corridor Zone]

RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO A PUBLIC HEARING. F ORDINANCE NUMBER 25, DASH TEN, AMENDING CITY CODE, SECTION 13 EIGHT DASH 23 B REGARDING BALANCED HOUSING AND TO ENACT A NEW ARTICLE 13 DASH FIVE ZERO CORRIDOR ZONE. TAYLOR JENSEN, ROUND THREE. SORRY, IT'S ME AGAIN. I'M SURE YOU'RE SICK OF HEARING MY VOICE. THIS IS A PETITION BY US, A STAFF. THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT REQUESTS. FIRST IS ADOPTION OF A TEXT AMENDMENT TO OUR BALANCED HOUSING ORDINANCE GRANTING CORRIDOR ZONE DEVELOPMENTS AS AN EXEMPTION TO THE BALANCED HOUSING ORDINANCE.

AND THE SECOND, LARGER ASK IS ADOPTION OF A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE. THE 13.13 DASH FIVE ZERO CORRIDOR ZONE. WE DID TAKE THIS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 18TH, AND AT THAT MEETING, WE RECEIVED A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BY A VOTE OF 7 TO 0. SO THIS MAP RIGHT HERE, THERE'S ANOTHER MAP THAT WOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE ZONE. THIS IS JUST KIND OF FOR REFERENCE. THESE ARE ALL PROPERTIES THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE CORRIDOR ZONE THAT WE'RE PROPOSING. AND THAT'S PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE CC ZONES OR LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY SANITARY STATIONARY PLAN, BUT ARE LOCATED WITHIN 300FT OF REDWOOD ROAD. SO AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT THIS CORRIDOR ZONE WOULD DO IS IT WOULD CREATE A NEW FORM BASED ORDINANCE WHICH COULD BE APPLIED TO REDWOOD ROAD. THIS IS NOT AN OVERLAY ZONE, SO IT WOULD REPLACE THE UNDERLYING ZONING IF SOMEBODY PETITIONED FOR IT. THE FUNCTION OF IT LEAVES A LOT OF THE STANDARDS AND BULK AND LOT STANDARDS TO THE COUNCIL TO DECIDE. SO IT WOULD REQUIRE MDA AND NDP WITH EACH SUCCESSFUL REZONE, WOULD ALSO NEED TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS WELL.

IF THIS IS ADOPTED, PROBABLY THE NEXT STEP THAT WE WILL TAKE AS STAFF IS SPONSOR. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGES TO CERTAIN PROPERTIES ALONG REDWOOD ROAD OR BAY IS A REALLY GOOD CHANCE TO REDEVELOP THOSE, TO SEND A SIGNAL TO THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THEY SHOULD LOOK AT UTILIZING AND SEND A MESSAGE THAT THESE ARE PROPERTIES THAT

[01:40:01]

WE WANT THEM TO CONSIDER. IF THEY SO CHOOSE TO PURSUE THIS ORDINANCE. WELL, THIS FORM BASED, IT IS A HYBRID BECAUSE WE DO STILL HAVE A LAND USE TABLE. I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LOT WHEN WE CAME THROUGH FOR COMMITTEE. OF THE WHOLE. I THINK WE LISTENED TO ALL THE COMMENTS WE RECEIVED FROM THE COUNCIL AT THAT NIGHT, AND THERE'S NO CHANGES DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE COUNCIL REQUESTED AT THAT TIME. BUT WE'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THESE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS LATER ON. AND AGAIN, I'M KIND OF ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THIS, BUT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THIS ORDINANCE, WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE WITHIN 300FT OF REDWOOD ROAD IF THE PARCEL ITSELF DID NOT FRONT ON REDWOOD ROAD, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE PAIRED WITH A PARCEL THAT DID FRONT ON REDWOOD ROAD. AND THEN IF THIS IS ADOPTED AND IT'S SUCCESSFUL, WE COULD PROBABLY MAKE SOME TWEAKS IF THE COUNCIL SO CHOOSES AND ADD IT TO OTHER CORRIDORS IN THE FUTURE. IF THAT WOULD SEEM TO BE DESIRABLE. AS I MENTIONED, IT WOULD BE GOVERNED BY AN MDA, AND RATHER THAN LOOK AT THIS FROM A DENSITY PER UNIT TYPE OF STANDPOINT, WE'VE ADOPTED TO GO WITH A FLOOR AREA RATIO. AND THAT'S BECAUSE WE DO HOPE THAT AT SOME POINT THIS IS A TRUE MIXED USE ZONE. AND WHEN WE LOOK AT THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, RATHER THAN JUST THE NUMBER OF UNITS WITHIN EACH DEVELOPMENT, MAX HEIGHT WOULD ALSO BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FLOOR AREA RATIOS ARE SOMETHING WE HAVEN'T REALLY USED IN THE CITY BEFORE. SO JUST A QUICK EXAMPLE OF WHAT A FLOOR AREA RATIO IS. A 1 TO 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO WOULD BE A LOT IN THE ENTIRE LOTS COVERED BY A BUILDING, OR A LOT THAT'S HALF COVERED BY A BUILDING, BUT IT'S TWO STORIES OR A LOT. THAT'S ONLY A QUARTER OF THE LOT IS COVERED BY A BUILDING. BUT THAT BUILDING IS FOUR STORIES. ALL OF THOSE ARE FLOOR AREA RATIO OF ONE. AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING PROPERTIES THAT USE THIS HAVE A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 1.5. SO THAT REALLY IS PROMOTING DENSITY WITH THESE DEVELOPMENTS.

OTHER RECOMMENDED MINIMUM BULK STANDARDS WOULD BE A GROUND FLOOR MINIMUM OF 12FT AND AT LEAST TWO STORY STRUCTURES. AND THEN WE'RE RECOMMENDING MAXIMUM SETBACKS ON THE FRONT AND SIDE TO KIND OF CREATE THAT BUILT ENVIRONMENT ALONG REDWOOD ROAD. AS THE BUILDINGS GET TALLER, THOUGH, WE DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE NOT SHADING OR OVERPOWERING THE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. THAT MIGHT BE TO THE EAST OR WEST OF THEM. SO THE SETBACK WOULD INCREASE. THE TALLER THE BUILDING GETS, THE CLOSER IT GETS TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE REAR. THE ORDINANCE IS RECOMMENDING PARKING IN THE REAR, SO ALL THE OFF STREET PARKING WOULD BE BEHIND THE BUILDINGS. AND THEN WHERE POSSIBLE, YOU'D HAVE MULTIPLE REAR LOADED PARKING LOTS THAT WOULD BE INTERCONNECTED. WHERE STRUCTURED PARKING IS USED, WE WOULD WANT THAT TO BE EITHER SCREENED OR WRAPPED FROM REDWOOD ROAD. TO BE VISUALLY DESIRABLE.

BUILDINGS. WE DON'T WANT TO, WITH THIS ORDINANCE, SAY WHAT DESIGN THE BUILDINGS SHOULD HAVE. WE JUST WANT TO CONVEY THAT THEY NEED TO BE WELL DESIGNED. AND SO AS EACH DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE TO COME TO THE COUNCIL, YOU HAVE A REALLY GOOD CHANCE AT THAT POINT TO TALK THROUGH WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL LOOK LIKE. BUT WE HAVE SOME BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN THERE AND THAT WOULD BE DISTINCT BASE. THERE'S ALSO FENESTRATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND THEN A LIST OF DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES WHICH THE BUILDING SHOULD INCORPORATE SOME OF. BUT WE WANT TO LEAVE THEM REALLY UP TO THE DEVELOPERS TO COME IN AND PITCH THEIR VISION TO THE CITY AND WHAT THEY THINK WOULD BE BEAUTIFUL IN THEIR LOCATIONS. THESE ARE JUST A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT EXAMPLES OF BUILDINGS WHICH ARE THROUGHOUT THE STATE, WHICH COULD POSSIBLY BE USED. THEY COULD LOOK LIKE NONE OF THESE OR ANY OF THESE. SO I DON'T WANT TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON THEM, BUT THIS IS JUST TRYING TO GET PEOPLE'S CREATIVE JUICES FLOWING AND LETTING PEOPLE KNOW THAT THERE'S A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT TYPES THAT COULD MEET THESE STANDARDS. PROBABLY THE NEXT BIGGEST THING THAT IS A CHANGE FROM BUSINESS AS USUAL WOULD BE THE WAY WE'RE LOOKING AT PARK AND OPEN SPACE IN THIS CORRIDOR ZONE. THE CORTISONE WOULD FACILITATE IMPROVEMENT OF THE PUBLIC REALM AND AN INCREASED INVESTMENT IN REGIONAL PARKS, AND THAT IS DONE BY REQUIRING AN IMPROVED OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IN ADDITION TO IMPACT FEES AND THEN REQUIRING AMENITIES TO BE PROVIDED FOR THAT. THE DEVELOPER WOULD THEN HAVE AN OPTION TO EITHER PROVIDE THOSE OPEN SPACE AND AMENITIES, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE IN A

[01:45:04]

VERY ATTRACTIVE PACKAGE. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES OF, OR THEY CAN CHOOSE TO PAY A FEE IN LIEU, OR THE COUNCIL CAN REQUIRE THEM TO PAY A FEE IN LIEU OF THAT FEE. IN LIEU WOULD THEN BE DESIGNATED TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD OR REGIONAL PARKS THAT ARE IN THE AREA THAT WOULD BE IMPACTED MOST BY THE DEVELOPMENT. AND THE THINKING BEHIND THIS IS THE MORE DENSITY YOU GET, THE CITY WOULD GET SOMETHING BACK, AND THAT WOULD BE BEING ABLE TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S PARK SYSTEM RATHER THAN HAVE A LOT OF DINKY SMALL PARKS ALONG REDWOOD ROAD WHERE NO ONE'S GOING TO LET THEIR KID GO PLAY AT ANYWAYS, BECAUSE REDWOOD ROAD IS BUSY AND SCARY. YOU KNOW YOUR KIDS TO PLAY THERE. SO TO FOCUS ON MONEY TOWARDS IMPROVING SOME OF THOSE REGIONAL OR LARGER NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS IN THE AREA. SO THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, IT WOULD BE PER UNIT 600 FOR A STUDIO OR ONE BEDROOM, 800FT■!S OF OPEN SPACE FOR A TWO BEDROOM UNIT AND 1000FT■!S OF OPEN SPACE FOR A THREE BEDROOM UNIT. THEN THERE WOULD BE A PRO RATA DETERMINATION OF AMENITY POINTS 100 PER ACRE. AND BASED ON KIND OF WHAT'S SHOWN HERE, AND THIS OBVIOUSLY WOULD HAVE TO GET WORK THROUGH IF THIS ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED AND ADDED INTO THE FEE SCHEDULE. BUT THE AVERAGE COST OF EACH AMENITY POINT IS ROUGHLY $500. THE FACT THAT I CAN THINK ABOUT. THANK YOU. SO HOW WOULD IT BE DEVELOPED? OPEN SPACE IS DEVELOPED. THE DEVELOPER COMES IN WITH THE PROJECT AND THEY SAY I'M REQUIRED TWO ACRES OF OPEN SPACE. I WANT TO DEVELOP AN ACRE OF THAT AND THEN PAY THE OTHER HALF IN FEE IN LIEU. SO ANYTHING THAT THEY WANT TO DO WITH OPEN SPACE WOULD HAVE TO BE INTEGRATED AS KEY FEATURES AND DESIGNS OF THE STREETSCAPE. IT WOULD NEED TO BE ACCESSED OFF A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, AND NOT CONTAIN HIDDEN AREAS THAT ARE NOT CLEARLY VISIBLE. THEY WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE DETAILED PRODUCT INFORMATION. THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD BE COMFORTABLE APPROVING THROUGH THE NDA, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO SELL IT, THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A BENEFIT TO THE CITY. IF A DEVELOPER COMES AND SAYS, I'M GOING TO PUT IN, YOU KNOW, THE WORLD'S CHEAPEST PARK BENCH AND GARBAGE CAN, WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACCEPT THAT. THAT'S GOING TO GO TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. AND YOU'D SAY, NO, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT. YOU'RE GOING TO PAY THE FULL FEE, AND THEY WILL TAKE THAT MONEY AND PUT IT INTO A CITY PARK. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE COST OF IMPROVING A SQUARE FOOT OF OPEN SPACE WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THAT FEE IN LIEU CALCULATION, PLUS THE COST OF BUYING THE APPRAISED OPEN SPACE AND THE VALUE OF THE AMENITY POINTS NOT BEING PROVIDED TO. QUICK QUESTION FOR YOU, OPEN SPACE, FIVE FOOT SETBACKS, MAXIMUM DOESN'T LEAVE A LOT OF ROOM FOR OPEN SPACE. HELP ME.

HELP ME SEE WHAT I'M MISSING. WELL, YOU'RE NOT MISSING. REALLY ANYTHING. THE DESIRE IS FOR MOST OF THAT MONEY TO GO TOWARDS PUBLIC PARKS. NOW, IF A DEVELOPER WANTED TO GO OVER AND ABOVE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STREETSCAPE, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD SELL TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS SAYING THIS IS AN OPTION. OR MAYBE THEY HAVE MULTIPLE BUILDINGS AND THERE'S GOING TO BE A COURTYARD BETWEEN THOSE TWO, WHICH IS GOING TO BE ACCESSED OFF THE PUBLIC ROAD AND HAVE REALLY NICE AMENITY IN THERE. THAT WOULD BE AN OPTION AS WELL. BUT I THINK IN 90% OF THE CASES YOU'RE GOING TO SEE MOST, IF NOT ALL OF THAT MONEY DIRECTED TOWARDS THE FEE IN LIEU TO BE PUT INTO A PUBLIC PARK. AND, AND MAYBE YOU CAN HELP ME. AND YOU THINK AFTER X NUMBER OF YEARS I WOULD KNOW THIS. THE SETBACK IS FROM THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. CORRECT. SO NOT ALL OF THE BUILDING HAS TO BE WITHIN FIVE FEET. IT COULD BE A U SHAPED BUILDING THAT HAS A YARD OR A COURTYARD. THAT'S CORRECT KIND OF THING. SO OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THAT FEE IN LIEU AS DETERMINED WOULD BE PAID ON A PRO RATA BASIS AT THE BUILDING PERMIT PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. AS MENTIONED, THOSE MONIES WOULD BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR MAKING IMPROVEMENTS IN REGIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. AND THEN THERE'S JUST A NOTE THAT FEE ONLY MONEY CANNOT BE USED FOR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES AT PARKS. IT HAS TO BE FOR IMPROVING THOSE PARKS. COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN THIS IS GOING TO BE DIRECTED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. YOU COULDN'T GET OFF THAT EASY TONIGHT, MR. CHANDLER. WITH THIS FEE IN LIEU AT $500 AT 100 POINTS THE WAY, IF I DID MY MATH WRONG, MATH RIGHT, THAT'S ABOUT

[01:50:03]

50 K, RIGHT? AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT USING THIS FEE IN LIEU IN ANOTHER PARK SOMEPLACE IN THE CITY. YEAH, BUT IT'S CLOSE BY. BUT WE ONLY HAVE ONE PARK THAT'S THAT I KNOW OF THAT'S FAIRLY CLOSE TO. WELL, I GUESS WE HAVE THAT OTHER ONE THAT'S JUST WEST OF THE THRIFT STORE ON 70TH SOUTH. IT COULD ALSO POTENTIALLY GO INTO JORDAN RIVER. OKAY. BUT MY QUESTION IS BECAUSE AND WE'VE HAD THIS DISCUSSION BEFORE, IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE REDWOOD ROAD CORRIDOR, THE FIRST PART OF THIS QUESTION IS BY USING THE MONEY SOMEPLACE ELSE. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT SOME SORT OF ILLEGAL EXACTION? AND THE SECOND QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS WE'RE CHARGING THIS FEE IN LIEU OF OPEN SPACE, BUT THEN WE ALSO HAVE PARK IMPACT FEES. SO DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS TO PAY THE PARK IMPACT FEE PLUS THE PLUS THE EXTRA 50 K? AND DOES THAT COME UP WITH ANY SORT OF EXACTION. THAT'S NOT GOING TO MEET THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD. I GUESS THE SHORT ANSWER WOULD BE THAT I DON'T HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT EXACTIONS WITH THIS STRUCTURE. IF YOU WANT TO GET INTO IT A LITTLE BIT MORE, I'D BE HAPPY TO SPEAK WITH YOU ONLINE AND ANSWER OTHER QUESTIONS THERE. BUT I THINK THAT THIS PASSES MUSTER AND WOULD HOLD UP JUST FINE. I'D LIKE TO. TAYLOR, IF THERE'S QUESTIONS ABOUT THE IMPACT FEE PORTION, ARE WE STILL IMPOSING THAT? YOU DON'T HAVE TO REMIND ME ON THAT. YEAH. SO THIS WOULD BE AN ADDITION TO THE IMPACT FE.

AND THE WAY YOU CAN REALLY THINK OF IT IS THE PARK FEE IN LIEU IS ESSENTIALLY A BUYOUT OF DENSITY.

SO BECAUSE THERE'S A LIMITED DENSITY HERE, THE DEVELOPER IS PICKING AND CHOOSING WHAT DENSITY THEY WANT TO PROVIDE. THEY'LL DO THAT CALCULATION AND NEGOTIATE WITH THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR NDA. BUT THE MORE DENSITY THEY GET, THE BIGGER IMPACT THEY'RE HAVING ON THE CITY'S PARK SYSTEM. THEY WON'T BE PROVIDING ANY OPEN SPACE, MOST LIKELY BECAUSE IT'S ALONG REDWOOD ROAD. WE DON'T WANT OPEN SPACE THERE ANYWAYS, SO THAT INCREASED BURDEN AND THAT INCREASED COST OF THAT DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PAID BACK TO THE CITY BY IMPROVING A PARK SYSTEM THAT WOULD STILL BENEFIT THEIR RESIDENTS. FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH, I KNOW THAT PAULA AND MYSELF BOTH WORKED EXTENSIVELY IN THE COMMUNITY THAT USED THIS EXACT SYSTEM FOR MANY YEARS, AND I'M SURE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT, WE COULD TALK HOW THAT HAS WORKED THERE.

AND THIS IS MY LAST SLIDE. UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH LIKE A DETAILED EXAMPLE OF HOW A CMU COULD WORK OTHERWISE, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COUNCIL MIGHT HAVE OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE TALK. THANK I THINK WE'VE HEARD A LOT TONIGHT, SO LET US ALL HAVE IT SINK IN AND I'M SURE MORE QUESTIONS WILL COME LATER. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I'M GOING TO MOVE TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME FORWARD. NOW. SEEING NONE. MR. ANDERSON, ARE THERE ANYBODY IS THERE ANYBODY ONLINE? THERE ARE TWO ATTENDEES ONLINE, NONE OF WHOM HAVE RAISED THEIR HAND. THANK YOU. WE WILL THEN CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL MOVE TO A MOTION OR DISCUSSION.

ANY DISCUSSION. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, I'M GOING TO START WITH THE DISCUSSION. I, I'M A I'M STILL UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THIS FEE AND LOU THING BECAUSE AND HERE'S WHY I SAY THAT WE CONSIDER GEM APARTMENTS NOT TOO LONG AGO AND WAS WAS WAS TOLD THAT IMPROVING AN INTERSECTION ONE INTERSECTION DOWN MAY BE AN EXACTION. AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PARKS THAT AREN'T EVEN IN THE CORRIDOR. SO I'M HAVING A LITTLE BIT OF CONCEPTUAL MAKING THAT WORK. SO I MAY NEED TO TALK TO THE CITY ATTORNEY OFFLINE. THE OTHER THERE'S ANOTHER PROBLEM THAT I HAVE, AND I JUST.

THE DENSITY BUY UP POINTS. I HAVE A HARD TIME GIVING PEOPLE POINTS FOR PUTTING OUT A GARBAGE CAN IS THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN PROPERTY, AND THEY GOT TO PICK IT UP. AND WE'VE HAD OTHER PROBLEMS ON OTHER, OTHER DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE WHERE SOMEBODY COMES IN AND THEY

[01:55:04]

THEY GET HALF OF THEIR THEY GET THEY GET 10 OR 15% OF THEIR DENSITY BUY UP BECAUSE THEY PUT IN NICE GARBAGE CANS. THAT'S THAT'S NOT THE TYPE OF THING THAT I THINK IS IMPORTANT IS IMPORTANT IN THE CITY. RIGHT? I AND SO I'M NOT A FAN OF THE GARBAGE CANS HAVING ANY SORT OF BUY UP POINT. AND SO I, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. AND THEN THE LAST CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS THE FACT THAT THIS THIS IS 13.5 0-3, THE LOT IN BULK STANDARDS. I GET THAT THE MAXIMUM LOT AND BULK STANDARDS WE CAN APPROVE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. BUT THEN IT SAYS THERE ARE SOME MINIMUM ONES AND THE ONE, THE MINIMUM ONES THAT I DON'T LIKE IN PARTICULAR ARE THE BUILD IS THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. BY THE WAY, IF FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE FOLLOWING ALONG, THIS IS LINES 50 THROUGH 62. IN THE. MARKUP VERSION. 75% OF THE LOT FRONTAGE. WELL WHAT HAPPENS IF AND I'M THINKING OF A COUPLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES. BUT COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB ONE WELL MENTIONED ONE. WELL IF IT'S A U SHAPED BUILDING, WELL WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY BUILD THE U. AND THEY MAKE A WANT IT LONG AND NARROW AND THE FRONTAGE IS GREATER THAN 25% BECAUSE THEY WANT TO MAKE IT LOOK MORE OPEN AND YOU GOT NARROW THAT GOES HIGH. I THINK THAT IF YOU CAN CONCEPTUALIZE A U SHAPED BUILDING THAT MIGHT BE THREE STORIES VERY NARROW ON THE WINGS, GOES BACK IN A WIDER BUILDING AND YOU'VE GOT A, YOU'VE GOT A U SHAPED CUTOUT, THAT U SHAPED CUTOUT COULD ACTUALLY BE WIDER THAN THE 75% OF THE LOT FRONTAGE, BECAUSE THE WAY THEY WANT TO BUILD IT TO, TO KIND OF SUCK PEOPLE IN HAVE A PLAZA AREA AMONGST A COUPLE OF LITTLE STORES WHILE PEOPLE LIVE AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS. SO I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. AND, AND, AND SO MY, MY QUESTION IS WITH THE LOT IN BULK STANDARDS, I MEAN, I DON'T CARE. I MEAN, WE'RE REQUIRED. WHAT WE'RE BASICALLY SAYING ON THIS IS WE'RE REQUIRING A TWO STORY BUILDING ALONG REDWOOD ROAD. AND IS, IS THAT IS THAT WHAT WE WANT? I MEAN, HOW DO YOU HOW DO HOW DO WE ACCOUNT FOR, LET'S SAY SOMEBODY WANTS TO HAVE A ONE STORY BUILDING RIGHT AT THE STREET THAT TEARS UP TO A SECOND STORY, STORY BUILDING WITH THE SETBACK THAT AND RIGHT NOW WE'RE SAYING THAT THE MINIMUM IS A TWO STORY BUILDING. SO I, THERE'S A COUPLE OF THESE THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO GET RID OF SO THAT WE HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY THAT IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO HAVE A ONE STORY BUILDING AS PART OF THEIR COMPLEX, THAT THEY CAN, YOU KNOW, IF THEY BUILT A ONE STORY, LET'S JUST HYPOTHETICALLY SAY THEY BUILD A ONE STORY RESTAURANT AND THEN THE NEXT BUILDING OVER IS TWO STORIES.

THEY CAN'T BUILD THAT ONE STORY RESTAURANT THAT HAS SOME OPEN SPACE OUT FRONT BECAUSE WE'VE GOT THESE BULK STANDARDS. AND I WOULD MUCH RATHER CHANGE SOME OF THOSE. TO, I MEAN, REALLY WHAT WE'RE ADOPTING HERE IS THE FIRST TIME IN WEST JORDAN'S HISTORY, WITH THE EXCEPTION REALLY, IS THAT WE'RE ADOPTING A FORM BASED CODE. IF THE WAY I READ IT, THIS IS REALLY FORM BASED, BUT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS WE'RE TRYING TO USE SOME EUCLIDEAN STANDARDS ON FORM BASED. SO THAT AND HONESTLY, I'D RATHER GET IN, YOU KNOW, THE, THE IN SOME RESPECTS, IF IT'S FORM BASED, I'D RATHER GET RID OF ALL THE LOT AND BULK STANDARDS COMBINED AND SEE WHAT THE PLAN IS AND WHAT WE WANT TO AUTHORIZE THAT WORKS. KNOWING WHAT THE INTENT OF THIS IS THAN TRYING TO SAY WHAT WE WANT IS FORM BASED CODE. BUT YOU GOT TO FIT INTO THIS BOX. AND SO I'VE GOT, I'VE GOT PROBLEMS WITH, WITH, WITH THAT SECTION OF CODE, MOST OF THE REST OF IT, YOU KNOW, I'M, I'M, I'M PRETTY GOOD ABOUT. BUT THAT ONE THE LOT AND BULK STANDARDS IS THE ONE THAT I PROBABLY GOT THE MOST HEARTBURN OVER AND THE GARBAGE CANS AND I DO HAVE A FEE IN LIEU LIEU ISSUE THAT I'D LIKE TO RESOLVE BEFORE WE PASS THIS. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM. VOTE. COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON. SORRY,

[02:00:03]

CAN I GO TO BLOOM FIRST? SHE HAD HERS ON AND IT WENT OFF. NOW, NOW, NOW PUT BACK ON. OKAY, I'M GOOD WITH ALL OF IT EXCEPT FOR THE FEE AND THE LIEU. I SEE THE PROS AND CONS. I FEEL THE CONS ARE A LITTLE TOO OUT OF MY COMFORT ZONE. THERE'S JUST TOO MANY VARIABLES. LIKE, YOU KNOW, IF PROJECTS GO LATER THAN THEY EXCEED WHAT WAS COLLECTED. AND THEN THAT LEAVES US IN THE BALANCE. AND I DON'T THAT THAT DOESN'T SIT RIGHT WITH ME. OF ALL THE POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF THAT. AND THERE THERE'S MORE CHALLENGES IN LEGAL ISSUES THAN THERE IS POSITIVE OUTCOMES IN OTHER CITIES THAT DO THAT. SO THAT'S ALSO MY CONCERN. SO I'M NOT COMFORTABLE WITH HAVING LIEU THE FEE IN LIEU OF IN THIS. I'M JUST NOT COMFORTABLE. COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG ON THIS. ISN'T THIS SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE APPLY FOR? IF THEY FEEL LIKE THIS IS AN OVERLAY, IT'S NOT THE ZONE. SO. I DON'T OKAY. IT WOULD BE A ZONE. SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO APPLY FOR IT AND IT WOULD REPLACE THEIR EXISTING ZONING. BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GO AND ZONE IN ANYONE ON THIS OKAY. SO CIRCLING BACK I DO JUST WANT TO THE LOT IN BULK STANDARDS. I DON'T THINK WE AS STAFF HAVE ANY CONCERNS. IF WE LOSE THOSE. IT'S REALLY HARD WHEN WE'RE WRITING CODE THAT'S SO DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANYTHING WE'VE EVER DONE BEFORE. WE WERE TRYING TO NOT BE TOO PLENARY OR SCARY. WE WANT TO GET RID OF LOT AND BULK STANDARDS AND SAY EVERYTHING'S DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND MASTER PLANNING AGREEMENT. I THINK WE AS STAFF ARE OKAY WITH THAT, BUT HAVING NO STANDARDS. WE THOUGHT THAT MIGHT BE A CONCERN FOR THE COUNCIL AS WELL. AND SO THAT'S KIND OF THE REASON THOSE APPEARED. BUT IF THOSE WERE TO GO AWAY, WE'RE OKAY WITH THAT. I GUESS. WELL, COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN SAID SOMETHING ABOUT FORCING PEOPLE INTO A TWO STORY BUILDING ALONG REDWOOD ROAD. I DON'T BELIEVE WE'RE DOING THAT WITH THIS. THE MINIMUM IS TWO STORIES. IF THEY APPLY FOR THAT ZONE. YEAH, RIGHT. THEY DON'T HAVE TO APPLY FOR THAT ZONE. SO I MEAN. MAYBE, MAYBE THIS NEEDS TO GO BACK TO A WORK SESSION.

MAYBE I FEEL LIKE WE'RE WE HAVE NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY EDUCATED AS TO WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH HERE. BUT FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, THIS SEEMS LIKE A GREAT TOOL FOR A DEVELOPER TO USE IF IT FITS THEIR NEEDS. IF NOT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO USE IT. SO ANYWAY, THAT'S MY THOUGHTS.

COUNCILMEMBER JACOB, THANK YOU. I AGREE WITH THE VERY LAST PART OF WHAT YOU JUST SAID. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON WAS WAS SPOT ON. IT'S A TOOL. IT'S WE'RE NOT REQUIRING ANYBODY TO DO ANYTHING. WE'RE NOT PUTTING IN NEW ZONING. AS MUCH AS I WISH MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE, WE ARE REZONING THIS WHOLE STRIP BECAUSE OTHERWISE WE'RE GOING TO END UP WITH, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT END UP. DO WE EVER END? BUT WE'RE GOING TO AT SOME POINT HAVE 50% OF REDWOOD DEVELOPED THIS WAY AND 50% DEVELOPED ANOTHER WAY AND 50% DEVELOPED THE OLD WAY, AND THAT'S 150%, WHICH IS A LOT FOR REDWOOD ROAD. SO I JUST, I WISH I, I WOULD LIKE TO, TO DO THE ZONING AND JUST GO AHEAD AND CHANGE THE ZONE AND, AND LET, LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY. I'M OKAY WITH THE ORDINANCE AS IT IS. IT'S MUCH LIKE WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT IN OUR WORK SESSION TODAY WITH THE CAP AND TRADE IS WHAT I WILL FOREVER CALL IT. SORRY. THE BALANCED HOUSING ORDINANCE, IF IT'S NOT RIGHT, WE'LL CHIP AWAY AT IT AND WE'LL FIX IT AS WE SEE APPLICATIONS COME IN AND ALL THESE APPLICATIONS HAVE TO COME TO THE COUNCIL, THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE. MDA. REQUIRED, RIGHT. FOR THE FORM BASED ZONE. YEAH, EVERYTHING WOULD BE A REZONE AND AN MBA AND AN MDP.

RIGHT. SO NOTHING'S GOING TO SNEAK BY RIGHT. SNEAK SNEAK THROUGH THIS AND GO WELL THIS ZONE SAYS I CAN HAVE THIS. SO THIS IS WHAT I'M APPLYING FOR. EVERYTHING'S GOING TO COME AND BE A YAY OR NAY ON THE COUNCIL. SO AND FROM MY EXPERIENCE, I MEAN, I'VE HAD A COUPLE OF DEVELOPERS REACH OUT TO ME ABOUT THIS SPECIFIC ITEM TONIGHT, VERY MUCH IN FAVOR WITH SOME CONCERNS, BUT VERY MUCH IN FAVOR. AND THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I AM. ALSO, IF IT'S GOT ISSUES, WE'LL FIGURE THEM OUT AND WE'LL WORK IT OUT. WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET A PERFECT ORDINANCE NOW OR AFTER ANOTHER WORK SESSION, AT ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING, AT ANOTHER, WHATEVER. WE WON'T GET IT PERFECT. BUT WE'LL WE CAN WORK WITH WHAT WE'VE GOT. I THINK WE'RE, WE'RE KNOCKING ON

[02:05:06]

THE RIGHT DOOR HERE AND, AND I THINK WE'RE GOING TO END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE THAT'S GOING TO BE THE DIRECTION TOWARD WHERE WE WANT TO GO. IF WE HAD THAT 20 YEAR VISION IN PLACE, I WAS TALKING ABOUT THIS. THIS, I THINK, GETS US CLOSER TO WHAT MOST OF US THINK IN THAT, IN THAT RESPECT. SO I'M I'M 100% READY TO GO VOTE ON IT. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, I AGREE WITH A LOT OF WHAT YOU SAID. IF IT'S A TOOL AND THEN WE HAPHAZARDLY DEVELOP REDWOOD ROAD, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANYTHING BETTER THAN WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE. AND THAT'S THAT'S PART OF MY CONCERN. IF WE ADOPT THIS AND A DEVELOPER COMES IN AND SAYS, YEAH, THIS IS THIS IS WHAT I WANT TO DO, AND IT'S UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE REALLY DON'T LIKE, BUT THE ORDINANCE ALLOWS FOR IT. LIKE THE FRONTAGE THAT'S THAT LIKE THEY HAVE A FRONTAGE THAT'S LESS THAN 75% OR SOMETHING. THAT'S ONE FLOOR PLUS TWO. WE CAN'T CHIP AWAY WITH THAT AT THAT POINT. WE HAVE WHAT WE WHAT I, I THINK THAT WHAT WE WHAT WE HAVE, I THINK THE, THE BETTER COURSE OF ACTION WOULD THAT WOULD BE THERE IS MAKE THIS A LITTLE BROADER, MAKE THIS A LITTLE BETTER. WE COULD THEN WE CAN NEGOTIATE IN THE MDA AND CHIP AWAY WITH IT. AND THEN WE CAN FIX THE ORDINANCE AFTER THE FACT. BUT IF WE LEAVE SOMETHING IN HERE THAT, YOU KNOW, IF WE SAY, WELL, IT HAS TO BE TWO STOREYS AND SOMEBODY COMES IN AND WANTS TO BUILD A ONE STORY BUILDING, OH, YOU HAVE TO REZONE IT SOMETHING ELSE. AND IF THEY REZONE IT SOMETHING ELSE, THAT'S A ONE STORY SOMETHING. AND YOU'LL, YOU'LL NOTICE. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I'M GOING TO POINT OUT HERE IS THAT IN THIS USE TABLE, THERE ARE NO SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS IN THIS ZONE.

CORRECT. AND SO THEN WHAT WE'VE GOT IS THAT WE'VE GOT, IF YOU REMEMBER, THIS WAS A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WE HAD A FAMILY THAT BOUGHT A PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S EVER BEEN DEVELOPED OR NOT, BUT THE SEMNORNIS BOUGHT THE PROPERTY SO THEY COULD HAVE PRIVATE ROAD AND PUT 3 OR 4 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON IT. WELL, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO GET IS IN THIS CORRIDOR ZONE IS IF WE DON'T WANT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ALONG REDWOOD ROAD, THEN IF SOMEBODY COMES IN WITH A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THEY CAN'T PUT IT ON THE, YOU KNOW, THEN THEY'RE GOING TO THEY'RE GOING TO USE THE CURRENT ZONING. AND THEN WHAT WE HAVE IS THE HAPHAZARD ZONING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO AVOID WITH THE MULTIPLE DRIVEWAYS AND ACCESSES GOING IN AND OUT OF REDWOOD ROAD. AND SO THAT'S MY CONCERN IS BECAUSE YOU'RE RIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE BETTER IF WE JUST ZONED THE WHOLE DANG THING AS CORRIDOR ZONES SO THAT WE COULD GET WHAT WE WANT, AND IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT, THEN I'M AFRAID THAT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO GET IS, OH, WE GOT A SINGLE FAMILY HERE BECAUSE SOMEBODY SOLD IT, AND THEY'RE GOING TO PUT AND WE'RE GOING TO GET THIS PATCHWORK THAT WE'VE GOT NOTHING ON REDWOOD ROAD THAT'S ANY BETTER, ANY BETTER THAN WHAT WE'VE GOT NOW WITH HOUSES AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS. SO THERE WE GO.

COUNCILMEMBER, LOOKING AT THIS. AND I'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, VARIOUS THOUGHTS BACK AND FORTH, BUT WHAT IS STARTING TO GET TO ME, AND IT WAS DEFINITELY A PART OF OUR EARLIER MEETING, YOU KNOW, FIVE HOURS AGO WAS, WHERE DO WE WANT TO SEE THIS CITY IN 20 YEARS? AND THIS IS CLOSER TO WHERE I WANT TO SEE OUR CITY IN 20 YEARS. AND I THINK THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE APPROVING, YOU KNOW, THINGS THAT AREN'T THE WRONG THINGS AND MAKING THEM GO THROUGH. THAT'S JUST MY POINT IS THAT I'M, I'M TRYING TO GET US CLOSER TO WHERE I WANT TO BE IN 20 YEARS AND NOT KEEP WAITING ON IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. TAYLOR. ALL RIGHT. AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION, I'M GOING TO MOVE FORWARD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 25, DASH TEN. I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL CHAIR LAMB AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB.

DISCUSSION TO THE MOTION. BY COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON. I AM THINKING ABOUT WHAT COUNCIL

[02:10:01]

MEMBER JACOBS SUGGESTED, AND MAYBE IF WE WERE TO DO THIS, IT WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK ANOTHER TIME. BUT WHY NOT JUST REZONE THIS? WHAT IS THIS REALLY? ARE WE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE? IF WE WERE JUST TO REZONE THIS ENTIRE SWATH OF LAND, OH, TAYLOR'S RUNNING LIKE THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. AND IT'S SOMETHING WE CONSIDERED, BUT ESPECIALLY WITH IT BEING A FORM BASED ORDINANCE. AND THERE'S SO MUCH THAT'S AT THE COUNCIL DISCRETION THAT'S DONE AT THE REZONE WITH THE MDA, BECAUSE I THINK YOU HAVE A LOT OF LEEWAY AS A COUNCIL TO NEGOTIATE ONCE THEY HAVE THE ZONING THEY ENTITLED. SO IF WE REZONE THE PROPERTY, WE AS THE CITY LOSE OUR ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GETTING THE HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS THAT WE WANT, THAT WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT THE DINKY LITTLE GARBAGE CAN DOESN'T COUNT AS THEIR OPEN SPACE IMPROVEMENTS. SO THAT'S WHY WE, AS STAFF, RECOMMEND DESIGNATING PROPERTY IN OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THIS, BUT NOT REZONING IT BECAUSE WE WANT TO REZONE IT TO HAVE THE NEGOTIATION OF THE NBA MVP. THANK YOU. OKAY. SO WHAT ABOUT OUR CONCERN OF THE PATCHWORK OF A PROPERTY OWNER SAYING, HEY, WELL I DON'T REALLY NEED THIS OVERLAY, SO I'M JUST GOING TO USE THE CURRENT ZONE AND DO WHATEVER IS CONFORMING WITH THAT ZONE. SO I WILL SAY THIS IS GOING TO BE VERY PLENARY SPEAK, BUT PARIS, ROME, LONDON ALL DEVELOPED PATCHWORK OVER HUNDREDS OF YEARS AND THEY'RE VERY BEAUTIFUL. OUR MOST BEAUTIFUL CITIES IN THE WORLD DEVELOPED PATCHWORK IMPERFECTLY OVER TIME. AND IT'S WHEN WE SEE PEOPLE COME IN AND TRY TO DO EVERYTHING ALL AT ONCE, IS WHERE WE SEE SOME OF DETROIT, IN A WAY, DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAVEN'T WORKED AS MUCH. SO YES, IT PROBABLY WILL DEVELOP PATCHWORK, BUT THERE'S A WHOLE MOVEMENT OUT THERE CALLED STRONG TOWNS, AND THAT'S ACTUALLY WHAT THEY ENCOURAGE. AND THAT'S A VERY STRONG AND GAINING A LOT OF SWAY THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IS INCREMENTAL. DEVELOPMENT IS THE WAY TO BUILD WEALTH AND COMMUNITIES AND TO DEVELOP LASTING PLACES WHICH DO WORK. SO I WOULD SAY THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY A NEGATIVE. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. OBVIOUSLY, WE WANT THE MDA ON A REZONE. COULD COULD WE BESIDES JUST PUTTING IT ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THERE'S PROBABLY MORE FOR AN ATTORNEY. COULD WE DESIGNATE THIS AS THERE'S THE CC ZONE, BUT THERE'S A CC CC OVERLAY THAT WE PUT AN OVERLAY OVER THE WHOLE AREA THAT SAYS WHEN THE PROPERTY COMES UP TO DEVELOP, THEN IT HAS TO BE REZONED TO THE CC. CAN CAN WE DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT? WE COULD. THE EXAMPLE THAT COMES TO MIND IS THE ILC, THE INTERCHANGE OVERLAY ZONE. HERE IN THE CITY WE HAVE DESIGNATED DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THAT. THEY WEREN'T REZONED AT THE TIME, BUT THEY WERE SAID THIS IS SECTION A, B AND C OF THE ILC. AND WE ANTICIPATE THIS TYPE OF USE. THEY STILL HAVE TO COME THROUGH THE REZONE PROCESS. THAT'S ACTUALLY WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON RIGHT NOW. SO THAT IS A POSSIBILITY. JEN, I'M JUST WAITING. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB THANK YOU. I'M JUST WAITING FOR THE FLOOR JUST TO BRING THIS KIND OF FULL CIRCLE AND BACK TO THE MOTION ON THE TABLE. I'M OKAY WITH APPROVING THIS ZONE SO THAT IT'S ON THE BOOKS. WE CAN TALK ABOUT HOW TO APPLY IT LATER, AND IF IT REQUIRES A TWEAK TO THE CODE SO THAT WE CAN APPLY THE ZONE NOW AND THEN THESE COME LATER, WE CAN LOOK AT THAT. WE CAN FIGURE THAT OUT. BUT FIRST YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE THE TOOL IN THE TOOLBOX. SO FOR ME TONIGHT, THIS MOTION, THIS VOTE, THIS ORDINANCE IS PUTTING THE TOOL IN THE TOOLBOX. AND THEN WE CAN FIGURE OUT HOW EXACTLY AND WHEN WE'RE GOING TO USE THAT TOOL. VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK, I, I WOULD SAY I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M GETTING THE RIGHT TOOL. WHEN I GO TO HOME DEPOT. I MAKE SURE I GET THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE RIGHT JOB. SO I DON'T AGREE THAT JUST ANY TOOL IS GOOD. ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. WITH COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB. YES, VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK. NO. COUNCIL MEMBER.

[02:15:16]

BLOOM. NO. COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BADOR. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER.

GREEN. NO. CHAIR. LAMB. YES. OKAY, I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 4 TO 3. ALL RIGHT. MOVING TO

[a. Resolution No. 25-009 approving amendments to Council Policies and Procedures]

BUSINESS ITEMS. BUSINESS ITEM A RESOLUTION. NUMBER 20 5-009, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO COUNCIL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. WE HAVE WARREN HALLMARK PRESENTING. THANK YOU CHAIR. BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, YOU HAVE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNCIL OFFICE OR THE COUNCIL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, RATHER COMMONLY CALLED COUNCIL RULES, AS PER OUR CONVERSATION AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING FROM FEBRUARY 11TH. THESE AMENDMENTS ARE AT THE INSTRUCTION OF COUNCIL AND HAVE BEEN VETTED BY THE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. YOU CAN SEE THEM IN FRONT OF YOU, BUT I'LL GO OVER THEM BRIEFLY. RULE 2.6 IS A NEW RULE, AND IT DEFINES THE PARAMETERS FOR TOWN HALL MEETINGS. RULE 3.5 ESTABLISHES AN ONLINE PRE-REGISTERED REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT, CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO IN PERSON, WHERE INDIVIDUALS MUST PRE-REGISTER IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. IT ALSO ESTABLISHES A ONE HOUR TIME LIMIT TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS, WITH THE COUNCIL ABILITY TO EXTEND THAT PERIOD WITH A MAJORITY VOTE.

NOTE THAT THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, JUST THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.

YOU HAVE RULE 6.6, WHICH REVISES COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SPECIFICALLY REMOVING THE REQUIREMENTS TO FILL THOSE ON THE SCREEN WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN FILLED FOR SEVERAL YEARS. WE WOULD OTHERWISE REMIND YOU THAT YOU HAVE CITY CODE ONE OR TITLE ONE, CHAPTER 613, WHICH ALLOWS THE CITY COUNCIL TO CREATE A STANDING OR TEMPORARY COMMITTEE AT ANY TIME THROUGH A RESOLUTION. AND THEN IF YOU REMEMBER, IN DECEMBER OF 2024, WE HAD AN OVERHAUL IN THE FORMATTING OF COUNCIL RULES. AND SO OUR FINAL ADJUSTMENT THERE WERE THERE WAS SOME REFERENCES THAT WERE INCORRECT THAT HAVE SINCE BEEN ADJUSTED TO COMPLY WITH THE UPDATED FORMATTING. SO IF THIS WERE TO PASS TONIGHT, ESPECIALLY THOUGH THE RULES AFFECTED BY RULE 3.5, OUR OFFICE WILL BE HITTING THE GROUND RUNNING, SO TO SPEAK, TOMORROW TO COMMUNICATE ON SOCIAL MEDIA, WORKING WITH THE MAYOR'S COMMUNICATION TEAM TO UPDATE INDIVIDUALS AS TO NEW REQUIREMENTS, DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC MEETINGS. MOVING FORWARD. WITH THAT, I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. THERE SEEMED TO BE A CONCERN ABOUT THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT, BUT AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND IN HOUSE HERE THERE IS NO REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT. YOU CAN STILL COME UP AND BE CALLED ON WITHOUT REGISTERING IN IN HOUSE. CURRENT RULES SAY THAT. YES, BUT THE PROPOSAL WOULD BE THAT YOU HAVE TO PRE-REGISTER BOTH IN PERSON AND ONLINE. AND AN INTERESTING SOMETHING WORTH POINTING OUT ON THAT. THAT'S ONLY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO JUST OBSERVE. I KNOW THIS ISN'T WHERE YOU'RE GETTING AT SPECIFICALLY, BUT IT IS A SIDE NOTE THAT JUST AS SOMEBODY CAN WALK IN TO CHAMBERS AND LISTEN WITHOUT PRE-REGISTERING, THERE WILL BE A LINK ONLINE THAT ALLOWS YOU TO SIMPLY OBSERVE THE MEETING WITHOUT PRE-REGISTERING IF THAT FIXES ANY CONCERNS.

COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK LOOKS VERY CONCERNED OR CONFUSED RATHER SO COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, JUST TO POINT OUT, IT DOES NOT SAY THAT YOU MUST FILL OUT A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD IN ADVANCE.

JUST SAYS YOU HAVE TO FILL ONE OUT. WE TALKED IN OUR COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ABOUT HAVING CARDS ON THE DAIS. SO IF, IF BECAUSE I MAY BE SITTING IN THE AUDIENCE AND THIS HAPPENED TO ME SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE I WAS ON THE COUNCIL WHERE I'D BE AT THE COUNCIL MEETING, AND I WASN'T PLANNING ON SPEAKING. BUT WHAT SOMEBODY SAID MADE ME THINK OF SOMETHING THAT PROBABLY ALSO NEEDED TO BE SAID. SO I GOT UP TO AND HAD MY THREE MINUTES. AS LONG AS I HAVE THE ABILITY TO FILL OUT THE CARD AD HOC, I THINK IT SHOULD BE OKAY. RIGHT? SO WHETHER IT'S A CARD OR I THINK JUST A SHEET WITH A PEN ON THE DAIS WHERE YOU PUT YOUR NAME, CHECK THE BOX. IF YOU'RE A WEST JORDAN RESIDENT OR THERE'S ANOTHER AND YOU CAN WRITE IT IN, OR YOU CAN WRITE YOUR PHONE NUMBER, WHATEVER, WHATEVER. AS LONG AS THERE'S A WAY FOR US TO CAPTURE IDENTITY INFORMATION AND THEY GIVE US THEIR NAME AND THEIR COMMENT, I THINK, I THINK YOU ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THIS. IT DOESN'T SAY THE PUBLIC COMMENT CARD HAS TO BE. I MEAN, LIKE STATE CODE SOMETIMES SPELLS OUT MUST BE THREE BY FIVE AND SAY THIS INFORMATION ON IT DOESN'T SAY THAT, IT JUST SAYS YOU SUBMIT A CARD TO THE STAFF. THAT COULD BE A SIGN UP SHEET ON THE DAIS. IT COULD BE WHATEVER,

[02:20:06]

HOWEVER WE DECIDE TO IMPLEMENT THAT. BUT IT DOESN'T SAY THAT IT HAS TO BE DONE IN ADVANCE, WHICH I THINK IS IMPORTANT. CORRECT. AND THERE ARE CITIES THAT DO HAVE TIMELINES WHERE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE TO PRE-REGISTER BEFORE A CERTAIN TIME PERIOD, BEFORE A MEETING STARTS. BUT CORRECT.

COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, WE ARE LOOKING WE ARE PROPOSING RATHER, NOR HAVE WE BEEN INSTRUCTED TO IMPLEMENT SUCH A REQUIREMENT. AND THE SAME GOES ONLINE. YOU CAN YOU CAN REGISTER ONLINE AT ANY AT ANY POINT. EVEN IF A MEETING HAS STARTED, YOU'D GET THE ZOOM LINK AND YOU'D BE ABLE TO JOIN JUST AS IF YOU WERE JOINING RIGHT ON TIME. COUNCIL MEMBER BEDORE I THINK QUESTIONS WITH THAT AND GOING, WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB SAID IS NOT ACTUALLY COMPLETELY TRUE WITH WHAT'S BEING SAID HERE. IT SAID MUST FILL OUT. YES. IT DOESN'T SAY MUST FILL OUT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING, BUT IT DOES SAY AND SUBMIT IT TO COUNCIL OFFICE STAFF. IF BY FILLING OUT JUST SIGNING A SHEET AT THE DAIS, IS THAT GOING TO BE, DOES THAT FULFILL THAT? AND IF THAT IS GOING ON THERE AT THE DAIS, ARE WE SURE THAT WHAT THEY'RE FILLING OUT IS ACTUAL NAME AND STUFF GOING ON? IS SOMEONE GOING TO COME OUT THERE AND CHECK THAT? EVERY TIME? I JUST I TOO, AM A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN IN ONE OF THESE COUNCIL MEETINGS NOT PLANNING TO TALK, BUT SOMETHING THAT WAS SAID MADE ME GET UP AND TALK, AND I GAVE YOU MY NAME AND WHERE I'M FROM.

AND SO I DON'T WANT TO STOP ANYONE ELSE FROM HAVING TO DO THAT. AND THEN SUDDENLY, WELL, BEFORE I TALK, LET ME FILL OUT THIS. LET ME GET THAT OVER. I THINK WE'RE SLOWING DOWN THE PROCESS. I WILL SAY I LOVE THE CARDS BECAUSE SEVERAL TIMES WHEN PEOPLE HAVE TALKED AND THEY DON'T HAVE SOMETHING, I'M I'VE HAD TO, YOU KNOW, TEXT MR. ANDERSON AND SAY, CAN YOU HUNT THAT PERSON DOWN AND GET THEIR INFORMATION FOR ME BECAUSE I WANT TO TALK TO THEM. SO IT IS IMPORTANT, BUT I THINK MAYBE WE NEED TO STRESS A LITTLE MORE THE IMPORTANCE OF FILLING OUT THOSE CARDS. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT HAVING THAT CARD IS THE END ALL BE ALL TO LETTING SOMEONE TALK.

IF THE EMOTION SUDDENLY GRIPS THEM AND THEY FEEL THAT THEY NEED TO TALK, I THINK THE SAME THING GOES IN THE ZOOM STUFF AS WELL. YOU KNOW, IT IS A CASE WHERE AT TIMES YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE MULTIPLE PEOPLE GATHERED AROUND A COMPUTER WATCHING A MEETING, AND DO WE MAKE THEM ALL OKAY, LOG OUT, LOG BACK IN, LOG OUT, LOG BACK IN. HOW ARE WE HANDLING THAT? IF WE'RE ALLOWING PEOPLE HERE TO JUST SUDDENLY FILL OUT SOMETHING QUICK, ARE WE SET TO DO THAT IN ZOOM MEETINGS? SO THERE'S MY QUESTION ABOUT THOSE TWO ITEMS WITHIN THAT ELEMENT. CERTAINLY IT IS MEANT TO BE. IT'S NOT MEANT TO BE INCONVENIENT TO DISSUADE PEOPLE FROM PARTICIPATING. I THINK IN THE SPIRIT THAT WE HAVE THIS CONVERSATION, IT'S HOW CAN WE BOTH FACILITATE AS MANY INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME TIME, BUT ALSO GETTING THEIR INFORMATION, SO TO SPEAK? SO IF WE IF WE WANTED TO FOLLOW UP WITH THEM OR WE'RE DOING OUR DUE DILIGENCE AS TO ENSURE THEY ARE WHO THEY SAY THEY ARE. SO I WOULDN'T DISAGREE THAT HOW IT MAY BE WRITTEN SHOULD BE REVISED IF THAT IF THAT IS PROLONGING A PROCESS AND MAKING IT NOT SO EFFICIENT OR EASY FOR SOMEBODY IN CHAMBERS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. I THINK GOING BACK TO HOW THAT CONVERSATION WENT, I THINK WE WOULD I DON'T THINK THAT'S CONTRARY TO ANYTHING THAT WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY TALKED ABOUT.

YEAH. IT'S JUST AS I WAS, YOU KNOW, GOING OVER THIS THAT REALLY STUCK OUT TO ME WAS WE'VE LITERALLY JUST REALLY JUST STOPPED SOMEONE THINKING, I NEED TO SAY SOMETHING. OH, WAIT, I'VE NOW GOT TO GO JUMP THROUGH THESE HOOPS. AND, BUT I THE EMOTIONS WITH ME NOW I DON'T WANT TO STOP AND HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, READJUST FOR SURE, MR. ANDERSON. YEAH. I JUST WANTED TO ADD BASED ON THE DISCUSSION, I THINK THERE'S AN EASY FIX TO THIS. SO WE CAN LEAVE CARDS AT THE TABLE AT THE BACK, BUT WE CAN ALSO SET SOME CARDS HERE AT THE LECTERN AS PEOPLE SPEAK, BECAUSE I THINK THE PURPOSE IS EXACTLY WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER BADER SAID NUMEROUS TIMES YOU'VE CONTACTED ME TO GET INDIVIDUALS INFORMATION THAT MADE COMMENTS BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO HAVE SOME FOLLOW UP, AND I THINK THAT'S THE PURPOSE BEHIND HAVING THIS REGISTRATION OF BOTH ONLINE AND IN PERSON. AND IF IT I'M HEARING VERY CLEARLY AND WE CAN TWEAK SOME OF THE WORDS IF YOU WANT TO INCLUDE THAT IN YOUR MOTION, THAT THESE REGISTRATION CARDS CAN BE IN THE BACK. AND WE CAN ALSO SET A BUNCH UP HERE ON THE DAIS. SO IF SOMEONE DOES WALK UP, THEY CAN KIND OF FILL IT OUT WHILE THEY'RE SPEAKING OR AFTER THEY SPEAK, AND I CAN FOLLOW UP WITH THEM. I THINK THAT'S REALLY THE INTENT OF HAVING THE REGISTRATION. AS FAR AS THE ZOOM ONLINE REGISTRATION, THE REGISTRATION CAN BE DONE AS SOON AS THE AGENDA IS POSTED. SO A WEEK AHEAD OF TIME AND ONCE THEY ENTER IN THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS FOR REGISTRATION, EVEN IF THE MEETING IS IN PROGRESS, THEIR EMAIL WILL HAVE A LINK FAIRLY INSTANTANEOUSLY THAT SHOWS HOW TO GET INTO THE MEETING. AND THEN WE HAVE EMAIL ADDRESSES THAT CAN BE USED BY THE COUNCIL. IF YOU WANTED TO FOLLOW UP WITH

[02:25:01]

AN INDIVIDUAL. AS FAR AS BEING ABLE TO VALIDATE FIRST AND LAST NAMES, THERE'S NOT REALLY A WAY TO DO THAT. IF SOMEBODY SAID, I'M JOHN DOE ON A CARD OR ON ZOOM, THERE'S NOT MUCH WE CAN DO TO VALIDATE THAT. I THINK SAFELY. BUT ONLINE, THE EMAIL ADDRESS IS HOW THEY WOULD GET THE MEETING INFORMATION. I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON. I GUESS I WANT TO ASK THE COUNCIL THIS QUESTION IS AS. HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO THE COUNCIL FOR US TO KNOW EACH PERSON'S NAME AND HAVE THAT VERIFIED? HOW IMPORTANT IS THAT TO US? AND. IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO GIVE PUBLIC COMMENT, YOU. ANONYMOUSLY, NOT UNANIMOUSLY, ANONYMOUSLY, EVEN HERE IN PERSON. LET'S SAY THEY'RE STANDING RIGHT THERE WHERE MR. HALLMARK IS STANDING, AND THEY DON'T WANT TO GIVE THEIR NAME. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD REQUIRE THEM TO DO THAT IN ORDER TO GIVE A COMMENT. AND ARE WE LIMITING FREE SPEECH BY REQUIRING IDENTIFICATION? THAT'S JUST QUESTIONS. I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION. IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO VALIDATE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY I CAN VALIDATE IS YOU FILL OUT A CARD AND ALLOW ME TO SEE SOME IDENTIFICATION, WHICH I THINK RUNS A FRONT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT. I THINK THEY PUT DOWN A FIRST NAME, A LAST NAME. THEY HAVE AN EMAIL ADDRESS TO GET THE LINK TO PARTICIPATE ON ZOOM.

WHATEVER THE INFORMATION THEY PLACE ON THE CARD, YOU KNOW, PHONE NUMBER OF ALL FIVES. I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE'S ANY WAY TO VALIDATE THAT, BUT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE INCLINED TO HAVE SOMETHING MEANINGFUL TO SAY TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE COUNCIL CAN ADDRESS, THAT'S WEST JORDAN RELATED ITEM, I THINK THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO PROVIDE THEIR NAMES AND PHONE NUMBERS WILLINGLY, BUT THAT'S PART OF THE PUBLIC DISCOURSE. COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN I'LL ADDRESS I'LL ADDRESS THE QUESTION ABOUT ANONYMOUS AND WHAT WE NEED. UTAH CODE, CHAPTER 52 DASH SOMETHING THE OPEN MEETINGS I HAD MY OPEN MEETINGS ACT TRAINING AGAIN YESTERDAY AND I CAN'T REMEMBER.

IT'S 50 TWO, DASH TWO, DASH 404 OR 50 2-4202 ISN'T IT ANYWAY? 50 2-4 IN OKEMAH REQUIRES US IN OUR MINUTES TO HAVE THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO SPOKE AND WHAT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE PERSON SAID.

NOW, THE OPEN ALSO ALLOWS THE RECORDING TO CAPTURE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE PERSON. THAT WAS SAID. BUT OPEN REQUIRES THE NAME AND THE MINUTES. AND SO I THINK BECAUSE OKEMAH REQUIRES THAT, I THINK WE HAVE TO REQUIRE THAT. AND SO THAT'S WHY I'M OKAY REQUIRING A CARD BECAUSE OR THE, THE REGISTRATION BECAUSE THOSE CAN BE CAPTURED. AND REALLY IT HELPS US FOLLOW UP. BUT IT TAKES THE BURDEN OFF OF MISS QUICK THAT SHE'S TRYING TO FIGURE OUT, OKAY, THE GUY'S NAME IS MCCORMICK. AND IS THAT MC OR IS THAT MC OR IS IT WHAT. YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF THAT IT MAKES THE MINUTES THAT MORE ACCURATE. SO I'M OKAY WITH THE CARD. I THINK THAT I AGREE WITH MR. HALLMARK THAT IT DOESN'T SAY PRIOR TO IT JUST SAYS REGISTER ON THE ONLINE. SO YOU GOT TO REGISTER TO GET INTO THE ZOOM MEETING AND YOU HAVE TO YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT A CARD HERE. AND I THINK THAT'S ASSISTS US IN MEETING OUR STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO GET THE MINUTES RIGHT. NOT ONLY. AND THEN WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE PERSON IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT THE COUNCIL NEEDS, THAT THE MAYOR NEEDS THAT CITY ADMINISTRATOR NEEDS, WE NEED TO DO THAT. SO AND I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE REGISTRATION. THAT'S WHAT THE LEGISLATURE DOES. AND IF YOU WEREN'T FOLLOWING SOME OF OUR FINE LEGISLATION THAT WAS PASSED, THE LEGISLATURE DID PASS. AND I WILL SAY I HAVE CHANGED MY MIND. I TOLD COUNCIL MEMBER WHITLOCK I CHANGED MY MIND. THE LEGISLATURE REQUIRES US TO HAVE AN ONLINE HEARING FOR TRUTH AND TAXATION. THE ONLINE PARTICIPANTS HAVE TO BE THERE. IT DOESN'T IT DOESN'T DIRECT THE

[02:30:05]

NUTS AND BOLTS, BUT IT SAYS THAT'S WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO. I THINK THAT'S WHERE THE LEGISLATURE IS GOING TO GO. AND IF WE MIMIC THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS, THE WHAT THE LEGISLATURE DOES, WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE TOO FAR AFOUL OF ANY OF ANY REQUIREMENT THAT COMES DOWN IN STATUTE UNLESS THEY CHANGE THAT. SO I'M GOOD WITH THE WAY THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN. THANK YOU. MR. CHANDLER, IF I MAY. I AGREE WITH COUNCIL MEMBER GREENE'S ASSESSMENT ON THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT, IMPLICATIONS OF GETTING NAMES, REGISTRATION BEING AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO DO IT. IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE SEE A LOT OF OTHER PUBLIC BODIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT, EMPLOY AS A WAY OF GETTING THOSE NAMES. AND IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC RECORD IS ACCURATE, THAT'S HOW THEY DO IT. TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE'S CONCERN ABOUT THE CURRENT PROPOSED LANGUAGE REQUIRING REGISTRATION BEFOREHAND, BODY MAY CONSIDER REMOVING JUST THE PREFIX PRE ON LINE 363 WHERE IT SAYS PRE-REGISTER. IF WE REMOVE PRE RIGHT THERE THEN THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR REGISTRATION TO OCCUR AT ANY POINT DURING THE ONLINE MEETING. OR EXCUSE ME THE IN-PERSON MEETING. I THINK THE ONLINE MEETING, JUST DUE TO TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF USING THE DIFFERENT METHODS TO ACCESS THE MEETING, IF YOU'RE LOOKING TO PARTICIPATE VERSUS JUST OBSERVE, PREREGISTRATION IS JUST A LOGISTICAL REALITY THAT'S NECESSARY THERE AGAIN, WHICH PARALLELS VERY CLOSELY THE WAY THAT THE COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND PARTICIPATION WITH THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION IS STRUCTURED. SO FOR WHAT THAT'S WORTH. VICE CHAIR WHITLOCK, THANK YOU. I WAS GOING TO POINT OUT YOUR 363 BECAUSE IT READS MUST PRE-REGISTER IN ORDER TO DO SO, WHICH SAYS THEY DO HAVE TO FILL THOSE OUT BEFORE. YEAH. SO I AGREE THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT BEFORE THIS IS IN A MOTION THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT. THE OTHER ITEM I WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP IS THE TOWN HALL. I DO AGREE WITH THE GENTLEMAN THAT CAME AND SPOKE, MR. MCCONAUGHEY, THAT WE PROBABLY DO NEED TO DEFINE OR JUST ENSURE SOMEHOW LANGUAGE NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO THAT, THAT IT'S NOT BEING USED AS A CAMPAIGN METHOD. I THINK THAT IS A LEGITIMATE CONCERN. BUT HERE'S THE OTHER PART OF THAT IS I HAVE NO INTENT IN VOTING YES TO THIS, BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE WE'RE LIMITING PUBLIC COMMENT IN MULTIPLE METHODS WHERE WE'RE WE'RE TAKING ANYONE THAT DOESN'T HAVE TECH AVAILABLE TOTALLY OFF THE LINE. IF ALL THEY HAVE IS A LANDLINE, THEY NO LONGER GET TO PARTICIPATE. WE'RE LIMITING PUBLIC COMMENT TO AN HOUR, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN A CONCERN HERE. AND UNTIL IT IS, I DON'T SEE THE NEED TO LIMIT IT AND I DON'T WANT TO. WE ALSO GOT AWAY FROM THAT. A GROUP COULD BE REPRESENTED BY A PERSON AND GET FIVE MINUTES. SO WITH THOSE I, I VERY MUCH THINK THAT WE NEED MORE PUBLIC INPUT IN THIS CITY, NOT LESS. AND SO I'LL BE VOTING NO. BUT I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE DO HAVE SOME KIND OF A DEFINITION IN THE MOTION, AND THEY GET RID OF THE PRE-REGISTER. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER BIDDER I HAD TWO NOTES AS WELL ON BOTH THOSE THINGS THAT COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK SAID FOR THE TOWN HALL. I THINK THAT IT SHOULD BE. TWO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL NEED TO FOR CALLING A TOWN MEETING. WHAT I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IS ONE OF THEM BEING THE PERSON WHO RESIDES IN THE DISTRICT THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD FACE. IF IT IS A PROJECT LOCATED IN A DISTRICT, AND THAT OBVIOUSLY COULD BE, THAT SHOULD BE A STANDARD. I WOULD THAT SOMEONE IN THE DISTRICT SHOULD BE AT LEAST AWARE OF IT AND BE A PART OF IT, AND, YOU KNOW, THE OTHER OBVIOUSLY COULD BE AN AT LARGE OR SOMEONE ELSE IN ONE OF THE OTHER DISTRICTS, BUT I WOULD ASSUME THAT IT WOULD BE A DISTRICT MEMBER AND AN AT LARGE THAT THAT KIND OF KEEPS IT A BIT FROM BEING JUST A CAMPAIGN PIECE, AND IT REALLY SETS IT UP THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THE SAME KIND OF THING. WHEN COUNCIL MEMBERS BRING SOMETHING TO A, YOU KNOW, TO OUR WORK SESSIONS, THAT IT'S TWO MEMBERS HAVE TO DO IT. IT'S NOT JUST ONE PERSON IN THEIR OPINION. I THINK IF WE HAVE THAT, I THINK THAT ALLEVIATES THAT A LITTLE BIT. I TOO AM AGAINST THE ONE HOUR TIME

[02:35:02]

LIMIT BECAUSE IT MAKES IT SOUND LIKE WE HAVE A HARD OUT, YOU KNOW, THAT WE'RE GOING TO LIMIT IT TO ONE HOUR, UNLESS WE CAN SHOW THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AGENDA.

THAT, TO ME WOULD BE RIDICULOUS, BECAUSE I WOULD HATE TO THINK AT ANY TIME IF THERE WAS A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT WANTED TO TALK, THAT SOMEONE ON THIS COUNCIL SAID, WE'RE SORRY, BUT YOU'RE CONTINUING TO TALK WOULD MAKE IT HARD FOR US TO VOTE ON THIS CODE OF SOMETHING. WE DON'T HAVE A HARD OUT. WE'RE HERE TILL 930 RIGHT NOW, SO I DON'T SEE WHAT THE ONE HOUR DOES. I'VE ONLY BEEN ON THIS THING FOR A LITTLE OVER A YEAR, AND WE'VE ONLY HAD ONES THAT THAT WENT OVER AN HOUR. AND, YOU KNOW, WE ALL KNEW IT WAS COMING, SO WE WERE READY FOR IT. SO THOSE ARE MY TWO THINGS. I'M, I LIKE I SAID, I DON'T LIKE THE WORDING THAT WAS THERE IN THE 3.5 WITH THE MUST FILL OUT. I DON'T LIKE THE ONE HOUR LIMIT. AND I THINK THAT THE TOWN HALL THING DOES NEED TO BE SET SO THAT THERE'S MORE OF A COMMITTEE OF THIS COUNCIL THAT'S INVOLVED IN THIS TOWN HALL AND NOT JUST ONE PERSON. IF IT IS ONE PERSON, THEN IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT IT IS, IT IS A CAMPAIGNING MOVEMENT. IF IT'S JUST ONE PERSON DOING A TOWN HALL, EVEN IF IT'S TO TAKE CARE OF A PROJECT, IT'S STILL A CAMPAIGN MOMENT, BECAUSE THAT PERSON WILL ALWAYS SAY, I WAS THE ONE THAT SET THIS UP, SO I'D RATHER GET RID OF THAT. TWO PEOPLE MAKES ME FEEL BETTER ABOUT THAT. SO I'M A NO. WITH THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN. NOW CHAIRED BY ME REAL QUICK. MR. ANDERSON JUST POINTED OUT THAT IN COUNCIL RULE 6.1, IT DOES SPECIFY THAT COUNCIL STAFF IS PROHIBITED FROM WORKING. EXCUSE ME ON CAMPAIGN PROJECTS IF THAT ALLEVIATES ANY CONCERNS THERE, AS COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK POINTED OUT. BUT WE'VE HEARD SEVERAL TIMES THAT EVERYTHING IS POLITICAL, EVERYTHING IS TRANSIENT. SO. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, JUST TO JUST TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THINGS. THE REASON WHY THE WORDING OF THE TOWN HALL CALLED BY ONE PERSON IS BECAUSE IF WE DO TWO PEOPLE, IT GETS AWFULLY CLOSE. IT DOESN'T MEET THE EXACT REQUIREMENTS, BUT IT GETS AWFULLY CLOSE TO CALLING AN OFFICIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL BECAUSE TWO MEMBERS OF THIS BODY, IF YOU FOLLOW THE RIGHT PROCEDURES, CAN CALL A MEETING AT ANY TIME. THE REASON WHY WE ALLOWED IT TO BE ONE WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OPEN ISSUES, AT LEAST THE WAY I UNDERSTAND IT, THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OPEN ISSUES. I, I, I, I CAN SEE WHERE COUNCIL MEMBER WHITE GLOVES GOING ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FOR POLITICS, WHAT I WOULD WHAT I WOULD STRIKE IF IT WERE THAT IF WE WERE GOING TO MODIFY THIS AND MAYBE WE NEED TO GO WORK ON IT IN A, IN A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. AGAIN, WHAT I WOULD STRIKE OUT IS MEETING WITH RESIDENTS AND PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING A PROJECT, A SPECIFIC ISSUE, OR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON A SPECIFIC PROJECT. THAT WAY WHEN WE DO THE TOWN HALL, AND I THINK WE COULD ALSO ADD SOMEPLACE IN HERE THAT WHEN WE ADVERTISE A TOWN HALL, WE HAVE TO PUT ON THE SPECIFIC ISSUE OR SPECIFIC PROJECT, AND THEN THAT ALLEVIATES THE ISSUE OF, WELL, IT'S JUST A MEETING WITH THE RESIDENTS, THE CAMPAIGN. I THINK WE CAN SOLVE THAT WITH A COUPLE OF SIMPLE WORDING THINGS HERE. THE ONE HOUR, I WILL TELL YOU THAT PUTTING THE ONE HOUR IN THE CODE IS PROPHYLACTIC. WHAT? WE DON'T WANT TO DO THAT SALT LAKE CITY HAD TO DO IS ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, WHAT SALT LAKE CITY DID WAS THEY SUSPENDED THE RULES, CHANGED THEIR RULES, AND THEN IMPOSED IT ON ON THE RESIDENTS THAT SAID, WE'RE TIRED AND WE HAVEN'T SEEN THIS IN WEST JORDAN, BUT IT EASILY COULD DO THAT. WE ARE THE THIRD LARGEST CITY IN THE STATE. WE HAVE A LARGE POPULATION BASE. AND WHAT I WANT TO DO IS MAKE SURE THAT WHAT WE'RE WHAT WHAT WE'RE DOING IS TRYING TO AVOID, LIKE WHAT SALT LAKE CITY DID WAS AVOID SITTING THROUGH TWO AND THREE HOURS OF SUPPORT, HAMAS SUPPORT ISRAEL. HOW BAD IS THIS? HOW BAD IS THAT, THAT NONE OF THIS, THAT WE HAVE CONTROL OF? WE HAVE WE HAVEN'T ADDRESSED.

I'M GOING TO TELL YOU THAT THE ONE THING THAT I'M NOT SURE THAT I LIKE IN THIS POLICY. AND SO I THINK WE OUGHT TO PROBABLY REWORK THIS. THE ONE THING THAT I DON'T LIKE AND I AND WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE HERE AND HOW TO DEFINE THIS. BUT IF A PERSON COMES UP

[02:40:02]

AND RIGHT NOW THE WAY THE RULES ARE WRITTEN, A PERSON CAN COME UP AND TALK FOR THREE MINUTES ON ANY SUBJECT THAT INCLUDES THE SUBJECT OF ANY PUBLIC HEARING. SO IN THEORY, THEY RIGHT NOW, THE WAY THE RULES ARE WRITTEN, THEY COULD COME UP FOR THREE MINUTES, TALK ABOUT LIKE TONIGHT WE HAD THE ANNEXATION AT COPPER MEADOWS. THEY COULD COME UP FOR THREE MINUTES IN PUBLIC COMMENT, TALK ABOUT HOW BAD THE ANNEXATION OF COPPER MEADOWS WAS. AND THEN WHEN THEY OPEN UP THE HEARING, WE HAVE NOTHING THAT STOPS US FROM HAVING THEM TALK ANOTHER THREE MINUTES ABOUT THE ABOUT THE COPPER MEADOWS. SO IF WE WERE GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING, I WOULD THINK THAT THE HOUR IS STILL GOOD. BUT I WOULD THINK FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENTS, WE'RE NOT RESTRICTING PUBLIC HEARING, BUT I WOULD THINK THAT WE WANT TO CLARIFY, AND I THINK WE CAN IF WE WORK WITH THE RIGHT LEGAL LANGUAGE, I THINK WE COULD PROBABLY RESTRICT THE PUBLIC COMMENTS TO ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA. IT MIGHT BE HARD, BUT OR AT LEAST IT HAS TO BE GERMANE TO WEST JORDAN CITY. SO WE'RE NOT HAVING TO DEAL WITH. YES, YOU GUYS HAVE GOT TO VOTE TO SUPPORT HAMAS, OR YOU HAVE TO VOTE TO SUPPORT ISRAEL. AND SO IF I WERE TO DO ANYTHING, THAT'S WHERE I WOULD WANT TO GO. BUT I THINK WE CAN FIX THE TOWN HALL THING BY JUST DROPPING THE WORDS, MEETING WITH RESIDENT AND CHANGING IT TO SPECIFIC ISSUE AND THAT, AND ADDING A LINE THAT SAYS THE ADVERTISEMENT HAS TO SAY WHAT THE ISSUE IS. SO I THINK WE CAN DO THAT. AND I THINK WHAT WE COULD ACTUALLY ALSO SAY IS THAT THE COUNCIL OFFICE HAS TO PREPARE THE, THE, THE ADVERTISEMENT EITHER ON FACEBOOK OR WHATEVER. AND IF WE DID THAT, THEN THE COUNCIL OFFICE BECOMES THE SCREENING TO HELP MAKE SURE, BECAUSE THEY CAN'T WORK ON CAMPAIGN STUFF, THEY COULD QUESTION THAT AND SAY, WELL, IS THIS REALLY CAMPAIGN RELATED OR IS THIS REALLY RELATED TO THAT ISSUE? SO THAT'S WHERE I'M GOING. SO I THINK I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THIS ARE NOT TABLE IT, POSTPONE IT OR NOT POSTPONE IT, SEND IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WORK ON SOME LANGUAGE AND THEN BRING IT BACK. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB THANK YOU. REGARDING THE TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND THE CAMPAIGNING, I, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN, BUT LET ME TELL YOU FROM FIRSTHAND EXPERIENCE THAT ANYTHING YOU DO AS A COUNCIL MEMBER WITHIN YOUR SCOPE OF DUTIES CAN BE CALLED CAMPAIGNING, BECAUSE YOU'RE SHOWING THAT YOU CAN DO THE JOB. AND SO YOU'RE GOING TO GO OUT AND YOU'RE GOING TO ASK THAT I GET TO CONTINUE TO DO THE JOB. I HAD SOMEBODY TELL ME THAT THE WAY I MADE A MOTION ON THE DAIS WAS CAMPAIGNING, BECAUSE A MOTION WAS MADE. THAT WAS WEIRD. AND I THOUGHT IT WAS AMBIGUOUS, AND I THOUGHT IT PUT A DEADLINE IN THAT DIDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. SO I OFFERED A SUBSTITUTE MOTION. I SAID, WELL, THIS DEADLINE MAKES MORE SENSE. HOW DARE YOU? YOU'RE JUST CAMPAIGNING. I MEAN, I KID YOU NOT, DOING YOUR JOB AS A COUNCIL MEMBER IS. CAMPAIGNING ISH BECAUSE THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S THE ADVANTAGE OF INCUMBENCY. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. SO IF I HOLD TOWN HALLS, FIRST OF ALL, THE THREE PEOPLE THAT COME GREAT, I GOT THREE VOTES. I MEAN, IF ANYBODY'S HAD A TOWN HALL WITH MORE THAN 20 PEOPLE THERE, LET ME KNOW. I MEAN, I ACTUALLY HAD LIKE TWO, BUT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT'S SHOWING THAT YOU'RE DOING YOUR JOB. THIS SAYS IT'S GOT TO BE ABOUT AN ISSUE. SO YOU CAN CALL IT CAMPAIGN RELATED. YOU COULD CALL IT NOT CAMPAIGN RELATED. YOU CAN MAKE IT FUZZY. YOU CAN MAKE IT NOT FUZZY IF YOU'RE HANDING OUT SIGNS AND LITERATURE. YEAH, OKAY. THAT'S A CAMPAIGN THING. AND YOUR STAFF CAN'T PARTICIPATE ANYMORE. BUT IF YOU'RE JUST MEETING WITH PEOPLE TO DISCUSS AND YOU'VE GOT A MAP AND YOU'VE GOT POINTS AND YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THINGS AND THAT'S DIFFERENT, I DON'T THINK IT'S I DON'T THINK IT'S HARD TO. DIFFERENTIATE. ANYWAY, SORRY I MISSED THE WORD PRE ON THE PRE REGISTERING. I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THE LINE THAT SAID FILL OUT THE CARD. I DIDN'T LOOK AT THE LINE IN FRONT OF THAT. SO YOU'RE RIGHT. IF WE TAKE OUT THE WORD PRE I THINK WE WERE GOOD. AND I'M OKAY WITH REMOVING THE ONE HOUR LIMIT I GET WHERE COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN IS GOING. YOU'RE NOT WRONG. BUT BUT AT THE SAME TIME THE PERCEPTION OUTWEIGHS THE BENEFIT IN MY OPINION ON THAT ONE. SO I'D BE OKAY PASSING THIS, REMOVING THE PRE AND REMOVING THE ONE HOUR LIMIT. THE OTHER STUFF AS FAR AS TECHNOLOGY AND PUTTING BARRIERS IN PLACE AND YADA YADA. FIVE YEARS AGO, WELL, MAYBE IT'S MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO BECAUSE IT'S PRE COVID, MAYBE 6 OR 7 YEARS AGO WE DIDN'T HAVE ELECTRONIC

[02:45:05]

MEETINGS, WE DIDN'T HAVE ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION. IF YOU WANTED TO COMMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, WE DIDN'T HAVE A COMMENT LINE. WE DIDN'T HAVE AN EMAIL ADDRESS. YOU EITHER HAD OUR CELL PHONE NUMBER OR YOU SHOWED UP RIGHT HERE OR OUR EMAIL ADDRESS, I GUESS, WHICH WAS ON THE WEBSITE. BUT YOU SHOWED UP RIGHT HERE TO SPEAK. THIS IS STILL BETTER. THIS PROPOSED WAY OF DOING IT IS STILL BETTER. IT STILL IS PROVIDING A WAY, AND IT'S JUST GIVING US A LITTLE BIT OF. A LITTLE BIT OF GUARDRAILS, IF YOU WILL, TO KEEP TO KEEP THINGS FROM GETTING TOO CRAZY WITH PROVIDING YOUR NAME AND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS ONLINE. I LIKE THAT IDEA BECAUSE SOMEBODY IN A RECENT, I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS A PUBLIC HEARING OR A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THEY WERE ON ZOOM, AS YOU KNOW, FREEDOM LOVER 101 OR WHATEVER, AND YOU ASKED THEM FOR THEIR NAME. THEY SAID, CALL ME BIFF OR WHATEVER IT WAS, AND THEY WE DON'T KNOW WHO THAT IS. IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT ANONYMOUSLY, SEND US AN EMAIL, LEAVE US A VOICEMAIL, CALL US.

THERE ARE PLENTY OF WAYS TO DO IT. WE DON'T HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, AND OBAMA DOESN'T LET US DO ANONYMOUSLY ANYWAY. SO. SO I'D BE OKAY PASSING THIS. REMOVE THE WORD PRE FROM THE REGISTRATION THING AND THEN REMOVE THE ONE HOUR LIMIT. I THINK. MR. ANDERSON, DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT? YEAH. WE RECOGNIZE THAT EVERYTHING YOU DO IS CAMPAIGNING. AND OUR OFFICE WE RECOGNIZE THAT I THINK THE LINE OF DEMARCATION FOR US IS ONCE YOU FILE TO RUN IS WHEN WE WILL BE MUCH MORE CAUTIOUS BECAUSE NOW YOU'RE ACTIVELY CAMPAIGNING. BUT THAT'S KIND OF THE LINE FOR US RIGHT NOW. NONE OF YOU HAVE FILED. SO ORGANIZING A TOWN HALL I WOULD NOT VIEW AS CAMPAIGNING, BUT WE RECOGNIZE THE POLITICS OF WHAT YOU'RE DOING. BUT ONCE YOU FILE TO RUN THEN, THEN WE'LL PROBABLY SCRUTINIZE SOME OF THE STUFF A LITTLE BIT AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT ASSISTING WITH THE CAMPAIGN. IF THAT HELPS CLARIFY. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BUDA. JUST REAL QUICK ON THE TOWN HALL THING. WE RECENTLY HAD ONE THAT I BELIEVE TWO PEOPLE ON THE COUNCIL PUT TOGETHER, AND I THOUGHT IT WAS GREAT AND BUT IT SHOWED MORE COUNCIL UNITY. AND THAT'S WHAT I LIKE ABOUT HAVING TWO PEOPLE PUT THAT TOGETHER. YOU SAID IT COMES CLOSE TO BUT IT'S NOT IT. I MEAN, IT DOES COME CLOSE TO BUT IT'S NOT BREAKING ANY KIND OF LAW. IT'S NOT SHOWING ANYTHING.

IF WE'RE LEGITIMATELY TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TOGETHER TO GET THEIR OPINIONS, THEN IT SHOULD BE AN OKAY THING THAT AT LEAST TWO PEOPLE FROM THE COUNCIL AND THEY COULD HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS ON THAT. BUT I AM A FAN OF MAKING SURE THAT A DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE IS A PART OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE TOWN HALL, AND IS A PART OF THAT, I, I THINK THAT THE KIND OF THING OF BRINGING THE COUNCIL TOGETHER IN THAT ROUTE IS GOING TO BE MUCH BETTER OFF IN THE LONG RUN THAN ONE PERSON DOING TOWN HALLS, BECAUSE, AS MR. ANDERSON SAID, ONCE WE GET INTO FILING AND CAMPAIGNING, THAT'S WHAT WE CALL OUR THINGS, WHERE WE HAVE JUST US TALKING, WE CALL THEM TOWN HALL MEETINGS. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO CALL THOSE TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND THEN WE CALL THESE OTHER THINGS TOWN HALL MEETINGS, THEN, THEN THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. BUT I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT THERE WAS MORE THAN JUST ONE PERSON BEHIND WANTING TO GET SOMETHING DONE. AND EVEN IF IT'S TWO PEOPLE WHO WANT TO THEN LATER SAY, WELL, THE TWO OF US TRIED TO DO SOMETHING, THE OTHER FIVE DIDN'T LIKE IT. THAT'S FINE. AT LEAST IT WAS TWO OF YOU THAT THAT WENT OUT THERE AND DID THAT. I WOULD JUST NOT WANT IT TO BE ONE PERSON TRYING TO TAKE THAT. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, THE REMOTE COMMENT SECTION IS WHAT I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH. NOT EVERYBODY IS COMFORTABLE TURNING ON THEIR CAMERA, PARTICULARLY INDIVIDUALS WHO MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO A WEBCAM OR HAVE PERSONAL CONCERNS SAFETY, DISABILITIES, RELIGION, PRIVACY EXCLUDES PEOPLE WITH LIMITED TECH ACCESS. SOME INDIVIDUALS ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO PHONES FOR PARTICIPATION AND BANNING PHONE COMMENTS EFFECTIVELY DISENFRANCHIZES THEM. LOW INCOME OR ELDERLY PARTICIPANTS MAY LACK THE DIGITAL LITERACY TO COMPLETE PREREGISTRATION OR CAMERA SETUP. PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE MEANT TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL RESIDENTS, AND RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENTS COULD BE SEEN AS LIMITING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT. MANDATING CAMERAS MAY LEGALLY CHALLENGE AS A BARRIER TO PUBLIC INPUT. SOME PARTICIPANTS MAY FEAR RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING OUT ON CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES, AND MAY PREFER A PARTIAL, ANONYMOUS ANONYMITY. I CAN'T TALK TODAY. CERTAIN GROUPS, SUCH AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVORS WHISTLEBLOWERS, MAY BE DISCOURAGED FROM PARTICIPATING IF THEY MUST PUBLICLY DISPLAY THEIR IDENTITY. SOME SOLUTIONS PARTICIPANTS CAN VERIFY IDENTITY PRIVATELY WITH WITH STAFF, BUT USE INITIALS OR FIRST NAME, PERMIT PHONE COMMENTS WITH EXTRA MODERATION. ALLOW PHONE PARTICIPATION, BUT REQUIRE MODERATOR TO VERIFY THE CALLER

[02:50:03]

BEFORE THEY CAN SPEAK. ENCOURAGE BUT DO NOT REQUIRE CAMERA UNLESS SPEAKING TO BALANCE SECURITY AND ACCESSIBILITY. THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS. FOR THAT, I THINK WE NEED TO CONTINUE MOVING FORWARD IN A DIRECTION WHERE WE ALLOW ALL OUR RESIDENTS TO PARTICIPATE, EVEN ONES WHO CANNOT MAKE IT DUE TO DISABILITY, ILLNESS OR OTHERWISE. BUT WE CONTINUE WITH OUR TECHNOLOGY AND KEEP MAKING IT BETTER AND ALLOW ACCESSIBILITY. I'LL BE A NO UNLESS THAT GETS CHANGED. I'M GOING TO KIND OF TAKE SOME PERSONAL PRIVILEGE HERE AND SAY, I THINK WE'VE SAID ENOUGH TONIGHT ON THIS, AND LET'S JUST MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT IT AND TAKE IT BACK TO COMMITTEE. I'M NOT SURE THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO MOVE. OKAY, CHAIR, IS CAN I THROW THAT MOTION TO YOU THEN? OKAY. I MOVED TO REFER THIS BACK TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR FURTHER DELIBERATION AND MODIFICATION. I'LL SECOND THAT. HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, SECOND BY COUNCIL CHAIR LAMB, COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB. THANK YOU. ISN'T A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOW WE GOT HERE, DO YOU THINK JUST SAYING IT WENT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE THIS WAS WHAT FOUR AGREED TO MORE OR LESS. RIGHT. THIS IS WHAT THE STAFF PERCEIVED AS FOR AGREEING TO IN A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, WHAT MAKES US THINK THAT GOING TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND BRINGING IT BACK AGAIN WILL. YOU KNOW, CHANGE ANYTHING? I DON'T KNOW, I JUST THAT'S HOW WE GOT HERE. AND WE CAN, WE CAN KEEP GOING ROUND AND ROUND. BUT NO, NO, NO, I SAID BEFORE, NO ORDINANCE IS PERFECT. NOBODY RARELY IS EVERYBODY SATISFIED.

AND YEAH, ANYWAY, THAT'S HOW WE GOT HERE IS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. BUT SO ANYWAY. ALL RIGHT LET'S VOTE. ON I HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE THAT SAYS, WELL, ACTUALLY IF YOU WANTED TO PASS IT FOR A TABLE, WE'RE REFERRING IT TO COMMITTEE. IT CAN BE A PLACE WHERE WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE WANT. RIGHT? WITHIN THE LAW. THIS MOTION IS ALRIGHT. SO IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO ROLL CALL, VOTE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I, I ALL THOSE IN NEGATIVE SAY NO. NO NO. ALL RIGHT. SO I HAVE SIX EYES AND ONE. NO. THIS WILL GO BACK TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. AND I AGREE WITH YOU ZACH. IT COULD BE RUN AROUND, BUT I THINK THERE WAS ENOUGH DISCUSSION TONIGHT THAT I THINK WE CAN LOOK AT IT ONE MORE TIME. PINPOINT. RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. WE DO HAVE REPORTS TO COUNCIL TONIGHT. DO

[a. City Council Reports]

WE HAVE ANY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING BEFORE WE CLOSE THE MEETING TONIGHT? I'VE GOT VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK. I JUST WANT TO CONVEY I'VE SEEN NOT ONLY IN SOCIAL MEDIA, BUT I HAD A CONSTITUENT CALL AND JUST EXPRESS GRATITUDE FOR OUR ALL ABILITIES. PARK AND VETERANS PARK ARE WILD WEST JORDAN AND WHAT THEY WERE VERY HAPPY ABOUT. AND I'VE ALSO HEARD MOM SAYING THIS WHEN I'M AT THE PARK IS THEY'RE SO GRATEFUL THAT WE HAVE THE FENCE AROUND THE PARK. IT WAS JUST A REALLY GOOD ADDITION. IT HELPS. IT HELPS WITH A SENSE OF SAFETY, AND IT KEEPS KIDS CORRALLED. AND I'LL END IT AT THAT. COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, JUST REALLY QUICK. FIRST OFF, I YEAH, NOW I LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT. I ATTENDED THE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING YESTERDAY. SOME INTERESTING DISCUSSIONS. JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS. THERE WILL BE A WHOLE MEDIA KIT, SOCIAL MEDIA KIT COMING OUT. I'VE TALKED TO MARIE AND MADE SURE THAT IF SHE DOESN'T GET IT IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THAT WE CAN DO IT BECAUSE THERE THERE'S A BIG PUSH IN ON MOSQUITOES AND SOME POTENTIAL DISEASES. WHAT I LEARNED YESTERDAY THAT THAT ALL RESIDENTS NEED TO WORRY ABOUT, AND IT WILL HELP US IN OUR WATER CONSERVATION STUFF. IS THAT OVER WATERING CREATES MOSQUITOES. AND TO GET RID OF THOSE WE DON'T OVER WATER. SO AND IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW THIS, EVERY STORM DRAIN IN THE CITY THAT WE HAVE 30,000 OF, BY THE WAY, PRODUCES 150 MOSQUITOES A WEEK. SO YOU CAN DO THE MATH AND FIGURE THAT OUT.

AND THAT'S WHY WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT STORM DRAINS ARE KEPT CLEAR AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS.

SO THAT'S A PLUG FOR ADOPT A STORM DRAIN PROGRAM. A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT CAME UP THAT I THOUGHT WERE SUPER INTERESTING IS THAT IN MOSQUITO PESTICIDE, THERE'S A LOT OF INERT AGREEMENT

[02:55:01]

INERT, INERT. INGREDIENTS THAT MAY COME FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES. AND SO THE QUESTION WAS ASKED, HOW DO INCREASED TARIFFS AFFECT US? IT PROBABLY IS NOT GOING TO AFFECT THE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT THIS YEAR, BECAUSE THEY'VE PURCHASED ALL OF THE PESTICIDE FOR THIS YEAR ALREADY.

AND SO THE ONLY REASON THEY WOULD HAVE TO BUY PESTICIDES AND A POTENTIAL INCREASED COST IS BECAUSE IT'S SOME, SOME EMERGING TYPE OF MOSQUITO THAT THEY GOT TO DEAL WITH IN AN IMMEDIATE SITUATION THAT THEY HAVE TO BUY. AND THE LAST THING, IF YOU JUST IN CASE YOU CARE FOR INQUIRING MINDS, THE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT ACTUALLY WHAT THEY CALL PRODUCT SWAPPING, THEY USE DIFFERENT MOSQUITO PESTICIDES SO THAT THEY CAN TRY TO AVOID THE, THE PESTICIDE RESISTANT STRAINS.

AND SO THEY DO SHUFFLE THE AND IN FACT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT THERE ARE THERE ARE SOME RESISTANT MOSQUITOES IN SALT LAKE THAT WE CAN USE THE PESTICIDE IN THIS END OF THE VALLEY BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT PESTICIDE RESISTANT HERE, BUT THEY ARE UP NORTH AND JUST JUST 10 OR 12 MILES NORTH. SO JUST SOMETHING THAT THAT I'M LEARNING MORE ABOUT MOSQUITOES AND BOY, THAT'S SCARY. BUT THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER JACOB. THAT REPORT REALLY BUGGED ME. SORRY. NO, I JUST WANTED TO BRING UP ONE THING I MENTIONED IN OUR PREVIOUS MEETING THAT I WENT TO LUNCH WITH PAUL AND GREG FROM UTILITIES AND TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT'S COMING DOWN THE PIKE AT JORDAN VALLEY WATER. AND I WANTED TO MAKE YOU GUYS AWARE AS WELL. THEY ARE LOOKING AT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING WATER BUDGETS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. SO LIMITING HOW MUCH WATER YOU CAN GET OR HOW MUCH I'M SAYING THIS WRONG. PAUL, PAUL PAUL CAN CORRECT ME IN A MINUTE, BUT LIMITING HOW MUCH WATER DEL BUDGET IN YOUR CONTRACT TOWARD A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S THE WAY THAT THEY'RE GOING ABOUT IT RIGHT NOW IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF ACRE FEET PER ACRE, WHICH WE HAVE SOME CONCERNS WITH BECAUSE AS YOU GET MORE DENSE, THE NOT ALL ACRES ARE CREATED EQUAL. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT THEY GET THIS RIGHT. SO AS THE BOARD MEMBER THERE, I'LL BE WORKING TO MAKE SURE WE GET THIS RIGHT. AND ALSO TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT KIND OF A LOCAL CONTROL ISSUE. WHY SHOULD THE DISTRICT DECIDE HOW THE CITY ALLOCATES THE WATER THAT WE'RE CONTRACTED TO PURCHASE FROM THEM? WE CAN FIGURE THAT OUT. AND IF WE NEED MORE WATER, WE'LL WE'LL LET THEM KNOW. YOU KNOW, WE'VE ALREADY DONE A LOT OF THINGS THAT WAY.

SO JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, THAT'S A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT ARE COMING DOWN THE PIKE. WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT VOTING ON THAT YET. BUT THAT'S THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING UP ON OUR MEETINGS TOMORROW. SO I DON'T THINK IT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA FOR TOMORROW. IT'S A COUPLE MONTHS DOWN THE ROAD STILL, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON. SO STAY TUNED. THANK YOU. MR. ANDERSON. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING FROM THE COUNCIL OFFICE TODAY? ALL RIGHT.

[c. Mayor’s Report]

AND WE'LL GO TO THE MAYOR. MAYOR, DO YOU HAVE SOME COMMENTS YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE WITH US? YES, DOCTOR. SUE STATE CAME AND WENT AND WE HAD OPPORTUNITY. COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK WAS THERE TOO, WITH SEVERAL OF OUR POLICE OFFICERS READING TO THE KIDS OVER AT HEARTLAND ELEMENTARY. CAN'T WE CAN'T HEAR YOU SPEAKING MORE DIRECTLY. OKAY. HEARTLAND ELEMENTARY HAD DOCTOR SEUSS DAY NEXT. WASATCH ELECTRIC HAD THEIR GROUNDBREAKING. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TO IT. IT WAS GREAT. THEY REALLY DUG IT. NEXT MAPS ON THE HILL WORKED VERY GOOD OVER AT THE CAPITOL TODAY. I THOUGHT TODAY LAST WEEK. THEY ARE ALWAYS THE BEST GROUP OF PEOPLE THERE.

NEXT, PEOPLE OF THE POLYNESIAN GROUP, THEY CALL THEMSELVES. POP. ANYWAY, THEY CAME AND PERFORMED HERE FOR STAFF AND THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR THOSE COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT WERE ABLE TO COME JOIN WITH US. THEY ARE ALL FROM WEST JORDAN HIGH SCHOOL NEXT, AND WE GOT TO HELP THEM BREAK THEIR FAST ON MONDAY NIGHT. I BELIEVE IT WAS. THEY DO IT EVERY NIGHT FOR A MONTH. THEY INVITED THE CITY OUT THERE. THANK YOU FOR THOSE IN THE CITY THAT CAME OUT AND JOINED. WE HAD SEVERAL POLICE OFFICERS, SOMEONE FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND I WAS

[03:00:01]

THERE AS WELL FROM THE MAYOR'S OFFICE REPRESENTING OUR CITY. NEXT UPCOMING THINGS. SATURDAY, MARCH 15TH WILL BE THE WEST JORDAN SYMPHONY SOLO AND ENSEMBLE SHOWCASE AT THE MERIDIAN. HOPE TO SEE YOU THERE. YOU ALREADY HEARD HOW GREAT THEY ARE AND HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING. I THINK THEY RIVAL WITH THE UTAH SYMPHONY. SO IF YOU WANT TO HEAR FANTASTIC PEOPLE, COME AND JOIN WITH US OVER THERE. AND IS THERE ONE MORE? IS THAT IT? OH, THERE IS ONE MORE COPPER HILLS BASEBALL LEAGUE IS DOING A FIELD DAY ON SATURDAY, MARCH 22ND AT THE IRONWOOD BASEBALL BASEBALL COMPLEX. THEY WILL BE OUT THERE DOING SERVICE AND MAKING THE PREPPING THE FIELDS AND GETTING THEM READY FOR THIS SEASON. THANK YOU. THAT IS MY REPORT. ALL RIGHT. THANK

[d. City Administrator’s Report]

YOU. CORBIN. ANYTHING FROM THE STAFF TODAY? I'VE GOT A I'VE GOT A NUMBER OF ITEMS. I'LL. I'LL SEND YOU A NOTE VIA EMAIL AND GIVE YOU AN UPDATE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. OUR LAST

[e. Receipt of the audit reports and the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024]

BUT NOT LEAST, RECEIPT OF THE AUDIT REPORTS, MR. ANDERSON. YEAH. MISS STECK APOLOGIZES FOR NOT BEING HERE. SHE IS ILL AND CAN'T BE HERE TONIGHT. THE AUDITORS HAVE FINISHED THEIR REPORT CALLED THE ACFR ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT, I THINK IS WHAT IT. YEAH, SOMETHING. OH, YEAH. ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT. THERE IT IS. AND THE AUDIT? THERE WERE NO FINDINGS. SHE DID MEET WITH THE BUDGET AND AUDIT SUBCOMMITTEE, WHICH CONSISTS OF COUNCIL CHAIR LAMB, COUNCIL VICE CHAIR WHITELOCK AND COUNCIL MEMBER GREENE. SHE MET WITH THEM AND WENT OVER THE REPORT WITH THEM. I DIDN'T KNOW IF THEY HAD ANYTHING. ANY OF THE THREE OF YOU WANTED TO ADD TO THE REPORT. THIS IS SIMPLY JUST A RECEIPT. EVEN THOUGH THE RCA HAD A MOTION RECOMMENDED, I DID VERIFY AFTER THE AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED THAT YOU ACTUALLY DO NOT NEED TO TAKE A MOTION. PRESENTING IT HERE IN THIS MEETING IS ENOUGH TO SHOW THAT YOU HAD RECEIVED IT.

COUNCILMEMBER GREEN, I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY, AS WE MET WITH THE COMMITTEE SO THAT THE REST OF, YOU KNOW, THIS YEAR, WE HAVE TO SELECT OUR THE AUDITOR WILL GO OUT FOR THE BIDDING PROCESS BECAUSE WE'VE HIT THE ONE YEAR PLUS FOUR. AND SO WE HAVE TO DO A NEW BID. AND THE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS BE PART OF THAT SELECTION PROCESS, SINCE IT ACTUALLY DOES BELONG TO US. SO WE WILL SOMEBODY IN THE COUNCIL WILL BE PART OF THAT PROCESS. SO AND WHEN DENISE WENT OVER THIS, JUST SO YOU KNOW, SHE, SHE PRESENTED THIS BUT SHE ALSO TALKED TO US ABOUT SOME OF THE ROAD STUFF. AND WE'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING PRETTY GOOD TO, TO HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO DO THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUFF AND STARTING THAT, THAT OUT ALMOST WHERE WE WANT TO BE. SO YEAH, THAT'S THAT'S WHAT CAME OUT OF OUR COMMITTEE, IF I REMEMBER. RIGHT.

[CONSENT ITEMS]

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE TO OUR LAST ITEM. CONSENT ITEMS MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOVE TO APPROVE BY MR. COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN AND A SECOND BY VICE CHAIR WHITLOCK.

I'M TRYING TO STAY AWAKE HERE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NO. WE HAVE THAT APPROVED. SO AT THIS TIME AT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.