[a. Ordinance No. 25-62 a Petition from Wagstaff Investments, LLC / Brent Neel to Amend the Future Land Use Map Amendment for 3.73 acres to Neighborhood Commercial and Rezone the Property to SC-1 Zone for a Development Located at 9047 S Copper Dust Lane]

THAT. SO WE ARE NOW GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS. THIS FIRST ONE IS GOING TO BE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2562. A PETITION FROM WAGSTAFFE INVESTMENTS, LLC TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND REZONE THE PROPERTY FOR A DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 9047 SOUTH COOPER DUST LANE. WE HAVE BRANT NEAL FROM WAGSTAFFE DEVELOPMENT AND FROM OUR STAFF, WE HAVE RAY MCCANDLESS, SIR, WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME UP FIRST. THANK YOU. BRANT. COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME IS BRANT NEAL AND I'M WITH WAGSTAFFE INVESTMENTS. THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. TONIGHT.

WE ARE HERE BECAUSE WAGSTAFFE INVESTMENTS HAS SUBMITTED A ZONING MAP AND A FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT ON A CERTAIN PARCEL ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST JORDAN. AND I THINK, AM I ABLE TO START THE SLIDE DECK? SO BEFORE I GET INTO THE SLIDE DECK, I WANT TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. SO WE, AS WAGSTAFFE INVESTMENTS, HAS BEEN EXTREMELY INTERESTED IN THIS PIECE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. A COUPLE YEARS AGO WE DID REACH OUT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER, WHICH IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, TO START TALKING AND NEGOTIATIONS AND TO KIND OF START GAUGING THEIR INTEREST IF THEY WOULD WANT TO SELL. AFTER A LOT OF TALKING THAT THAT DID NOTHING REALLY HAPPEN FROM THAT. AND THEN EARLIER THIS YEAR, WHEN WE LEARNED ABOUT THE 90TH SOUTH ROAD PUNCHING THROUGH THE BACCHUS HIGHWAY AND THE FUTURE DESIGN OF TYING INTO MOUNTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR, THAT'S WHEN WE STARTED NEGOTIATIONS AGAIN. AND THAT'S WHAT GOT US TO THIS POINT. SO THAT'S WHEN I SUBMITTED A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND ALSO ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, AND STARTED THE PROCESS OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE

[00:45:01]

WHOLE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND HERE TO THIS POINT RIGHT NOW, THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY IS SITTING AT R1 TEN, WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL. THE WE ARE PROPOSING TO CHANGE IT TO SC ONE, WHICH ALLOWS US. OH THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S WORKING. SO THIS IS THE PARCEL RIGHT HERE. SO IT'S ON THE 90TH SOUTH AND NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY ON THE WEST SIDE. SO WE ARE PROPOSING SC ONE COMMERCIAL ZONE. THAT IS WHAT'S ALLOWED ANYTHING BELOW FIVE ACRES. AND WE LET ME GO ONE MORE. THIS IS THE OVERALL BROADER LANDSCAPE OF THE PROPERTY IN GENERAL. SO YOU HAVE INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH MIXED IN WITH RESIDENTIAL TO WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED, AND COMMERCIAL A LITTLE BIT TO THE EAST. LET ME GO ONE MORE. SO BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED. SO THIS IS WHAT WHEN WE STARTED THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR SORRY, THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING, THIS IS WHERE WE CAME IN. TO MY FAULT, I THOUGHT IT WAS MORE OF LIKE A DRC WHERE IT WAS AN OPEN COMMUNICATION. SO THAT'S WHY WE SHOWED A STRIP MALL INSTEAD OF KIND OF PARTICULARS OF WHAT WE REALLY WANTED TO DO. AND THEN I QUICKLY REALIZED THAT WE NEEDED TO BE MORE SPECIFIC. SO WHEN WE GOT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, THIS IS THE PLAN THAT WE DID THAT WE SHOWED ON THE 3.73 ACRES. WE ARE SHOWING A STRIP MALL ON THE BACK, WHICH IS A BUFFER, AND THEN SOME OTHER USES THAT ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE SC, ONE OF A GAS STATION, FUEL CANOPY AND A CARWASH. AND THIS IS AGAIN A CONCEPT PLAN.

AND THIS MIGHT BE MORE OF A TOPIC WHEN WE GET, YOU KNOW, IF WE GET TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION.

BUT THIS IS JUST OUR FEELING AFTER TALKING, YOU KNOW, AMONGST OUR GROUP AND MANY OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT THIS SITE IS A GREAT PIECE FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING. NOT ONLY, AGAIN, DO WE FEEL THAT, BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT TO MY RECOGNITION ARE IN LINE. SO IF IF FOR SOME REASON AT THIS POINT IT DOESN'T GET APPROVED, I KIND OF SEE IN THE FUTURE THAT IT'S KIND OF GOING TO KEEP GOING BECAUSE THE, THE PROXIMITY OF THIS, OF THIS PROPERTY. AND I KNOW THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE HERE TONIGHT, SO I WANT TO LET THEM SPEAK A LITTLE BIT AS WELL. BUT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING WE HAD SOME COMMENTS ABOUT WHY ISN'T THIS RESIDENTIAL, WHY DOES IT HAVE TO GO TO COMMERCIAL. AND WE AND THE PROPERTY OWNER HAVE ALSO REACHED OUT TO SOME HOME DEVELOPERS ABOUT HOW THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE R1 TEN AND HOW THAT IF THAT'S APPLICABLE, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD WORK. THE HOMEOWNER SAID THAT THAT IS, IN THEIR OPINION, NOT A GOOD FIT TO KEEP IT AS R1 TEN. AND IF ANYTHING DID HAPPEN, THEN UPWARDS TO 60 UNITS WOULD HAVE TO BE ON THAT AND HIGH DENSITY IN ORDER TO MAKE IT WORK. AND EVEN WITH THAT, THEY'RE THEY POLITELY DECLINED EVEN SUBMITTING AN OFFER BECAUSE THEY FELT THAT IT WAS BETTER USE AS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL AS WELL. SO AGAIN, THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE TONIGHT, IS TO KIND OF START THAT CONVERSATION OF GETTING IT REZONED TO THE SC ONE, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME OR. COUNCIL MEMBER LAMB, HAVE YOU HAD ANY FEEDBACK ON IF YOU GO BACK TO THE MAP OF THE THE OTHER, HAVE YOU ANY FEEDBACK ON THE ENTRANCES AND EXITS THERE AS FAR AS FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE NORTH SIDE, WOULD THAT BE A RIGHT IN LEFT IN ONLY AND THERE BE NO TURNING LEFT BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC THAT'S THERE? CORRECT. SO WE'VE TALKED WITH NESTOR, THE THE CITY ENGINEER OR THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER THAT WOULD BE TREATED AS A RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT ONLY. SO PEOPLE HEADING WEST ON 90TH SOUTH, THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO TURN LEFT AT THAT SPOT. OKAY. SO THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE COULD HEADING WEST, ENTERING INTO THIS, THIS SITE WOULD BE TO TURN LEFT ON NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY AND THEN ENTER ON THAT ACCESS ON THE ON THE FURTHER SOUTH PORTION. AND THEN MY BIGGEST HANG UP BEFORE WAS ANY ENTRANCE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK WHAT THIS DOES HERE IS THIS KEEPS THE TRAFFIC OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE IF YOU HAD A BACK ENTRANCE INTO THERE, A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD GO USE THAT AND THAT WOULD BRING MORE FLOW OF TRAFFIC IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH I'M SURE THEY DON'T WANT.

SO THANKS FOR KEEPING THAT OUT AND HAVING THAT BUFFER ZONE. I'M GUESSING BY THE LOOKS OF THIS, YOU'LL BE PUTTING IN SHRUBBERY AS WELL, CORRECT? YEAH. SO I MEAN, BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL, THERE'S ALWAYS MASONRY BLOCK OR A FENCE THAT'S REQUIRED. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE KIND OF SHOWING. WILL THERE BE A FENCE. YES. OKAY. SO ALONG COPPER DUST LANE THAT'S WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE TREES I GUESS I COULD USE. OH GOODNESS. ANYWAY, SO A LONG COPPER DUST LANE. WE ALL KNOW WHERE THAT IS. BUT THE TREES WOULD BE A BUFFER AND A 20 TO 25 FOOT BUFFER. ZONE 20 IS TYPICALLY THE ORDINANCE. OOPS. WITH TREES, A MASONRY WALL. AND THEN AGAIN, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DIVE INTO MORE WITH THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION OF ALL THE MITIGATION AND THE RISKS THAT WE WANT TO NOT IMPOSE MORE THAN WHAT WE CAN ON THAT PROPERTY. YEAH. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, THANK YOU. MY QUESTION IS REGARDING THE

[00:50:07]

PROPERTY OWNERSHIP TRANSFER, NOT BETWEEN THE CURRENT OWNER AND WAGSTAFF, BUT BETWEEN THE ROAD, NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY. IF THAT'S UDOT, I THINK IT'S UDOT, RIGHT. THAT'S GOING TO REALIGN THIS ROAD BECAUSE THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN THAT'S HERE. AND IF YOU BACK UP ONE SLIDE, THE PARCEL OUTLINED HERE ARE DIFFERENT SHAPES. CORRECT. SO HOW DOES THAT WORK IF WE REZONE THIS TRIANGLE. BUT YOU END UP BUILDING ON SOMETHING THAT IS NOT THIS TRIANGLE. IF YOU COULD HELP ME UNDERSTAND THAT. YEAH. SO THIS IS THE TRIANGLE THAT AS IT CURRENTLY SITS. AND THEN MAYBE SOMEONE WITH THE CITY CAN CAN GIVE A LITTLE FURTHER INSIGHT. BUT AS FAR AS TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS IS THE PROPOSED DESIGN THAT THEY ARE STILL REVIEWING. SO IF THAT IS THE CASE WE WOULD STILL OWN THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE COUNTY PARCEL MAP. BUT IF THERE'S ANY EXCESS PROPERTY, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE DEDICATED OR THAT SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD HAVE THE OPTION TO PURCHASE. I KNOW TALKING WITH THE CITY ALONG 90TH SOUTH, THERE'S SOME CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR STORM DRAIN AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO WITH THE BEGINNING STAGES OF THE CITY, THERE WOULD BE SOME GIVE AND TAKE AS FAR AS GIVING SOME EASEMENTS AND POSSIBLY SOME ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON OH, I'M SORRY, SINCE WE SINCE WE LAST DISCUSSED THIS IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. I'M CURIOUS WHAT SUBSTANTIAL MATERIAL CHANGE HAS OCCURRED SINCE WE FIRST DECLINED TO SUPPORT THIS REQUEST. YEAH. SO THE FIRST ONE WAS A LARGER STRIP MALL. AND AGAIN, THAT WAS WHAT'S PERMITTED WITHIN THE SC1 ZONING. I THINK A LOT OF IT WAS US SHOWING A DRIVEWAY ALSO ON COPPER DUST LANE AT THAT TIME. AND AGAIN, THAT WAS JUST A CONCEPT PLAN. BUT WE KNEW WE QUICKLY REALIZED WE NEEDED SOMETHING MORE THAN JUST A BASIC CONCEPT PLAN, BUT MORE OF MORE THOUGHT INTO IT. AND SO WITH THIS WE NOW HAVE WE WERE SHOWING WHAT THE ROAD DEDICATION COULD POTENTIALLY IN THE NEW DESIGN. I BELIEVE WE HAD THAT ON THE PREVIOUS ONE. BUT THIS IS WHAT THE CITY HAS ALSO SAID. THIS IS THE DESIGN.

THEY'RE GOING TO TRY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AND WITH THE STRIP MALL. IT WAS A LARGER USE.

THERE WAS A COUPLE THAT WERE 20 TO 30,000FT■!S BUILDINGS AND A W OTHER RETAIL. SO THIS WOULD HAVE JUST A SMALLER RETAIL ON THE BACK END WITH A GAS STATION, FUEL CANOPY AND CAR WASH OUT ON THE EAST SIDE. SO BASICALLY JUST INSTEAD OF A LARGER STRIP MALL, THAT COULD BE A ANY KIND OF A LARGER BIG BOX RETAIL AND THEN OTHER USES, THIS WOULD BE MORE OF WHAT WE WOULD BE ALIGNED WITH. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON, THANK YOU. AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING WE HAD OUT OF THE FIRE STATION, A NUMBER OF THE RESIDENTS EXPRESSED TO ME THAT THEY WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE WITH HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IN LIEU OF. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. AS SUCH AS THIS.

HOW DO YOU WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY TO THEM REGARDING? WHY YOU'RE PURSUING THIS ROUTE VERSUS A HIGHER DENSITY HOUSING? YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. SO FOR US, WELL, I GUESS THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE HEARD AT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AS FAR AS CONCERNS, WHICH IS SAFETY AND TRAFFIC, THE KIDS GETTING ACROSS THE STREET IN 90TH AND THOSE KIND OF MEASURES. BUT FOR US, IF YOU DID HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, IN MY OPINION, THAT ONLY INCREASES THE THAT CASE WITH CHILD SAFETY IS WHAT THEY WERE PROPOSING. JUST BECAUSE IF HE HAD 60, 60 PLUS UNITS ON THAT, TOWNHOMES, CONDOS, APARTMENTS, WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE TO GET TO THAT, TO WHERE IT MAKES SENSE AS A DEVELOPER TO THE UNITS THAT WERE NEEDED, THAT WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY, IN MY OPINION, BE SMALLER. YOU KNOW, YOUNGER FAMILIES AND KIDS WOULD DEFINITELY BE A PART OF THAT. SO A LOT OF THE BACK AND FORTH THAT WE HAD WAS, WAS SAFETY MEASURES. SO IF THIS IS WHERE IF IT'S COMMERCIAL AND WE HAD A ROCK WALL, A MASONRY FENCE DIVIDING THE RESIDENTIAL WITH THE COMMERCIAL, AND THEN WE DID ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SIDEWALKS, IN MY OPINION, THAT GIVES THEM A SAFETY, MORE OF A SAFETY MEASURE TO GO ON THE SIDEWALK. AND WITH THE FUTURE ROAD DESIGN, THERE'S GOING TO BE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. SO THAT'S WHERE THE KIDS CAN SAFELY CROSS. SO IN MY OPINION, WHETHER IT'S HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL AND THAT CAN BE RETAIL, A LIBRARY, WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE, I THINK THERE'S STILL GOING TO BE MANY THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED NO MATTER WHAT THE ZONING IS HIGH DENSITY AGAIN, OR COMMERCIAL, JUST BECAUSE A LOT OF THOSE WOULD HAVE TO BE MITIGATED THROUGH, YOU KNOW, SAFETY WITH 90 SOUTH AND THOSE MEASURES, NOT NECESSARILY THE DIFFERENCE OF HIGH DENSITY AND COMMERCIAL, IN MY OPINION. THANK YOU. CHAIR WHITELOCK WOULD LIKE TO ASK A QUESTION.

THANK YOU. MY QUESTION IS THIS IS A GREAT SITE PLAN. YOU KNOW, IT WOULD PROVIDE ALL OF THIS.

BUT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR TONIGHT IS NOT APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN. WHAT YOU'RE ASKING

[00:55:05]

FOR IS JUST A ZONE CHANGE. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. YES. THE OF COURSE, THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL WOULD COME WITH THE WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION AND WORKING WITH STAFF TO GET TO THAT POINT. SO TONIGHT AGAIN THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN. SO TALKING THE PARTICULARS THAT WOULD COME IN A LATER TIME. BUT THIS IS JUST A CONCEPT BECAUSE I KNOW THE COUNCIL AND THE CITY WANTED TO SEE WHAT OPTIONS THERE WERE. THESE ARE JUST USES THAT ARE WITHIN THAT SC1 AS PERMITTED USES. SO THIS WAY IT WOULD GIVE YOU A BETTER IDEA OF WHAT COULD HAVE BE DONE, INSTEAD OF WHETHER THAT'S LARGER STRIP MALLS OR WHAT IT MIGHT BE. BUT TONIGHT IS JUST STRICTLY THE REZONE, AND THAT'S WHY WE FEEL BASED OFF THE SITE PLAN, IT'S A GREAT PROPERTY FOR FOR COMMERCIAL. SO YOU COULD THIS COULD GO IN THERE OR YOU COULD PUT ANYTHING THAT QUALIFIES IN OUR SC1 SELL IT. SO THIS THIS IS A GREAT LOOKING PICTURE. BUT WHAT WE'RE APPROVING IS JUST TO GIVE YOU AUTHORITY TO BE ABLE TO BUILD WHATEVER IS POSSIBLE IN SC1. SO CORRECT. AND THAT'S WHERE WE'RE WORKING WITH CITY. AND THEN THAT'S WHERE WE WOULD LOOK AT THAT AT THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THAT ZONING. THANK YOU. DO I HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. WELL THANK YOU MR. NEIL. WE WILL NOW OPEN THIS UP TO PUBLIC COMMENTS.

AS BEFORE. YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND HAVE A SEAT. WE'LL BRING YOU UP POSSIBLY LATER. BUT RIGHT NOW THIS IS FOR THE PUBLIC TO VOICE THEIR OPINIONS ON THIS. AGAIN. YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. WE ASK YOU TO COME UP AND PLEASE, WHEN YOU COME UP TO GIVE US YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. I'LL CHECK OUT THIS. JOE COLOSIMO CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SALT LAKE CITY, 27 C STREET, SALT LAKE CITY. LET ME START BY APOLOGIZING TO THE NEIGHBORS. FOR YEARS, PEOPLE THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A CATHOLIC CHURCH, AND SO DID WE. IT WAS OUR OUR INTENTION 25 YEARS AGO. BUT WITH THE SHORTAGE OF STAFF, WE HAVE CHANGED OUR BUILDING SITE REQUIREMENTS. WE NEED TO GO TO A BIGGER CHURCH ON A BIGGER PIECE OF PROPERTY SO WE DON'T WEAR OUT THE THE LOCAL PRIEST OTHER THAN THE FACT THE SITE IS TOO SMALL, IT SITS REALLY ON, TOO BUSY OF A STREET NETWORK FOR US. THE STREETS. IT'S JUST HARD ON THE ACOUSTICS. IT'S HARD ON IN AND OUT AND SO IT'S JUST WAY TOO BUSY. IF WE WERE TO BUILD A CHURCH THERE. WHEN WE DECIDED TO MOVE AWAY FROM THIS SITE, WE APPROACHED A COUPLE HOMEBUILDERS IN OUR COMMUNITY, SHARED THE SITE WITH THEM, SHARED WITH THEM THE CURRENT ZONING, AND THEY PASSED ON IT. THEY WERE NOT INTERESTED. THEY DIDN'T THINK IT WAS A RESIDENTIAL SITE. AT THE TOWN HALL MEETING, IT WAS SUGGESTED BY A NEIGHBOR AND SHE SAID, QUOTE, CALL EDGE HOMES. THEY BUY EVERYTHING. SO I, I REACHED OUT TO EDGE FOR AN OPINION AND AN INTEREST IN THE SITE. I HAVE SUBMITTED THEIR LETTER IN YOUR PACKET, BUT THEY BASICALLY SAID IT WAS NOT AN R 110 SITE. THE CURRENT ZONING THEY WOULD NEED DENSITY AROUND 20 UNITS PER ACRE. THEY CLOSED THEIR LETTER WITH CANDOR BY SAYING THAT IT APPEARS THE PROPERTY WAS MORE SUITABLE FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL. WE AT THE CHURCH WOULD ASK THAT YOU PLEASE CONSIDER THE ZONE CHANGE AT THIS TIME SO THAT WE CAN CLOSE OUR TRANSACTION AND BUILD A CHURCH ON A SITE THAT MEETS OUR NEEDS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE DID HAVE THREE PEOPLE WHO FILLED OUT LETTERS. SO MAYBE I'LL CALL YOU UP. CASES. LOOKS LIKE SAWYER. COME ON UP, PLEASE. I FEEL LIKE I JUST REPRESENT MOST OF THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE IN THE AREA I LIVE. MY HOME WOULD BE EXACTLY ADJACENT TO THIS NEW CHANGE. WHEN I BOUGHT MY HOME, LIKE MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA, WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION IT WOULD BE A NICE, QUIET CHURCH. I UNDERSTAND THEIR PROBLEM IN NEEDING A LARGER AREA. IT IS A QUIET AREA CURRENTLY, BUT IT WILL NOT BE AS SOON AS YOU PUNCH THROUGH 90TH AGAIN.

THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WENT TO MANY MEETINGS FOR AND WAS OUT OF OUR CONTROL. SO YOU HAVE NOW ISOLATED US INTO A SMALL TRIANGLE. ARE YOU ALL AWARE OF HOW THAT LOOKS ON THE MAP? SO WE ARE NOW SURROUNDED BY BUSY STREETS. IN ADDITION TO THAT STOPLIGHT THAT WILL GO IN. IT'S NOT A TRADITIONAL FOUR WAY STOP THAT IN A TRADITIONAL MANNER. IT'S BEING CURVED AND MOVED AROUND TO TRY AND MANIPULATE THROUGH THAT PARK, A BUSY PARK WHERE THERE ARE TONS OF CHILDREN AND WE'VE BEEN ISOLATED, AND THERE'S NO WAY FOR OUR CHILDREN TO GET SAFELY

[01:00:02]

OUT OF ANY OF THESE AREAS, LET ALONE HAVE A GAS STATION. THAT WOULD THEN BE SUCH AN INVITATION TO ALL THE CHILDREN FROM THE PARK, FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. OUR WORRY IS THAT BY REZONING, WHILE THIS IS A LOVELY SITE PLAN AND I'M SURE THEY'LL DO EVERYTHING TO MAKE IT NICE, IT DOES OPEN UP FOR IT TO BE ANYTHING, AND OUR WORRY IS THAT IT WOULD BE A STRIP MALL, IT COULD BE ANYTHING ELSE. AND WE ALL LIVE THERE UNDER THE EXPECTATION IT WOULD BE A QUIET CHURCH. SO WE JUST ASK THAT IT NOT BE REZONED. I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT MIGHT NOT BE GREAT FOR THEIR FINANCIAL, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE GOOD FOR OURS IF IT IS REZONED THAT WE LIVE RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THAT. THE BUSY OLD BINGHAM HIGHWAY THAT GOES RIGHT THROUGH KEEPS US ISOLATED FROM THE COMMERCIAL THAT IS WAY ACROSS THE STREET. BUT IF YOU PUT THIS RIGHT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, WE WON'T BE ISOLATED. WE'LL JUST. IT'LL JUST BE RIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO, JEAN MCINTYRE. THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME A MOMENT. I HAD SOME THOUGHTS HERE AND MY PHONE JUST CHANGED MY POSITION. SO HOLD ON. OKAY. LIKE YOU SAID, MY NAME IS JEAN MCINTYRE AND I ALSO RESIDE IN WEST JORDAN, AND I RESIDE OUT IN THAT LOCATION THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IN THIS MEETING. LIKE CASEY, I LIVE VERY CLOSE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. NOW, I HAVE THREE POINTS THAT I WANTED TO FOCUS ON. FIRST OF ALL, WHO YOU REPRESENT, THE NATURE OF THE PROPERTY TRANSACTION AND OUR NEIGHBORHOODS HISTORY WITHIN THE CITY'S DECISIONS, THE CITY COUNCIL'S PRIMARY OBLIGATION IS TO ITS VOTING RESIDENTS, NOT THE FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF A LARGE ENTITY OR OUTSIDE DEVELOPERS. THE RIGHTS OF THE VOTING RESIDENTS WHO LIVE HERE EVERY DAY SHOULD BE FUNDAMENTALLY OUTWEIGHED THE FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF A COMMERCIAL BUYER OR A MULTIBILLION DOLLAR ENTITY LIKE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. NO OFFENSE. WHICH DOES NOT RESIDE ON THIS PROPERTY. YOU WERE ELECTED TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS, PRIORITIZING A COMMERCIAL SALE OVER THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY NOISE LEVELS. AND I WANT TO POINT THAT OUT FOR ONE SECOND, BECAUSE THE GENTLEMAN FROM THE CATHOLIC CHURCH MENTIONED THAT THAT AREA HE FELT WAS TOO NOISY FOR A CHURCH. SO IF IT'S TOO NOISY FOR A CHURCH, WHAT IS THIS CHANGE GOING TO DO FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD? THE NOISE IS GOING TO EXPLODE AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO ENJOY THAT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPERTY VALUES OF OUR HOMES WILL POTENTIALLY BE DROPPED. SO FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE ELECTED, THIS SENDS A CLEAR MESSAGE ABOUT WHOSE INTERESTS TRULY MATTER IN WEST JORDAN. IF YOU CHOOSE TO APPROVE THIS, THE CIRCUMSTANCES NOW SURROUNDING THE POTENTIAL SALE SUGGEST THE DEVELOPER DRIVEN PROPOSAL, NOT AN ORGANIC MARKET NEED FROM THE LANDOWNER. WE HAVE BEEN. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED. IT CHANGED ON ME AGAIN. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT THE CHURCH WAS APPROACHED BY THE DEVELOPER AND THERE IS CURRENTLY NO FOR SALE SIGN ON THE PROPERTY. THIS IS A SPECULATIVE PUSH FOR MAXIMUM PROFIT, NOT A COMMUNITY INITIATED NEED. THIS PUTS THE ONUS ON THE COUNCIL TO DEFEND THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY FROM A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION INITIATED BY AN EXTERNAL COMMERCIAL INTEREST. POINT THREE THE RESIDENTS IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY FEEL DISENFRANCHIZED BY PAST COUNCIL DECISIONS AND URGE YOU TO LISTEN. THIS TIME, MANY OF US STOOD BEFORE THIS COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY REGARDING THE CURRENT. ABOUT 97. CAN YOU STILL HEAR ME? YEAH. I'M SORRY. YOUR TIME IS UP. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. VERY SORRY. ALL RIGHT.

BUT YOU CAN YOU CAN ALWAYS EMAIL OUR OUR US AS WELL. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SEND US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JEAN AND THERESA MCINTYRE IS GOING TO TAG IN AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES AS WELL. MY NAME IS THERESA MCINTYRE. I ALSO RESIDE IN WEST JORDAN, IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY WITH THE REZONING REQUEST. AND I'M HERE TO URGE YOU TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REZONING. I UNDERSTAND THE DESIRE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL AND PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE FUNDAMENTAL PURPOSE OF ZONING LAWS, BUT THE WESTERN GENERAL PLAN SAYS THAT YOUR JOB IS TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF OUR COMMUNITY. RE DESIGNATING

[01:05:01]

THIS PARCEL, I FEEL LIKE FOR COMMERCIAL USE WOULD VIOLATE THAT PRINCIPLE AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THE GENERAL PLAN EMPHASIZES THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF DENSITY, CONCENTRATING COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AROUND SPECIFIC ASSETS LIKE TRACK STATIONS AND YOUR JOB. THE JOB OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION STATED ROLE IS TO MAINTAIN NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY AND FOSTER A SENSE OF NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY. WE FEEL LIKE A COMMERCIAL ZONE DIRECTLY BEHIND OUR HOMES ERODES THIS IDENTITY AND VIOLATES THESE CORE PRINCIPLES. MANY OF US MADE SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS HERE BASED ON THE CURRENT ZONING, BELIEVING THAT THIS WAS GOING TO BE A LOW IMPACT USE OF A CHURCH. THE INTRODUCTION OF THIS INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DRASTICALLY ALTERS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE CHOSE TO JOIN, INTRODUCING UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF NOISE, LIGHT POLLUTION, TRAFFIC, AND SAFETY HAZARDS. A CHANGE IN ZONING DIRECTLY IMPACTS PROPERTY VALUES. OUR HOMES, WHICH REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL AND EMOTIONAL INVESTMENT FOR MANY OF US, WILL LIKELY SEE A DECREASE IN VALUE. WE RECOGNIZE THE CITY'S NEED FOR DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS. TO THAT END, MY NEIGHBORS AND I ARE WILLING TO SUPPORT REZONING TO A MULTI HOUSING CLASSIFICATION SUCH AS TOWNHOMES. THIS ALIGNS WITH THE GENERAL PLANS HOUSING STRATEGIES, INCREASES DENSITY RESPECTFULLY AND REMAINS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER, AND AVOIDS THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF INTENSE COMMERCIAL USE. I ASK YOU TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BY ADHERING TO THE ESTABLISHED VISION AND PRINCIPLES OF THE WEST JORDAN GENERAL PLAN. PLEASE VOTE TO KEEP THIS PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL OR ALTERNATIVELY, CONSIDER A RESIDENTIAL MULTI-HOUSING DESIGNATION THAT PROTECTS THE SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN THIS IN THE ROOM? PLEASE COME ON UP AGAIN IF YOU'LL START WITH YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. I AM ROSIE AND I'M GOING TO WING THIS BECAUSE ANYWAYS, I'M ROSIE AND I ACTUALLY LIVE ON CRESCENT, MY LANE, WHICH IS RIGHT IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL. SO 19 YEARS AGO WHEN THAT COMMUNITY CAME TO FRUITION, LIKE I BUILT MY HOUSE THERE WITH MY FAMILY AND I WAS PREGNANT WITH MY THIRD CHILD AND WAS I KNOW I WAS GOING TO HAVE MY FOURTH PREGNANT WITH MY FOURTH CHILD.

I HAD JUST BARELY HAD MY THIRD CHILD. AND WHEN WE DECIDED TO BUILD THERE BECAUSE WE WERE ACTUALLY THINKING ABOUT BUILDING A HOME, IVORY HOMES OVER BY LIKE 80 SOUTH, WHEN WE SAW THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND HAD THE UNDERSTANDING THAT A CATHOLIC CHURCH WAS GOING TO BE THERE, WE REALLY LOVED THE FACT THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE QUIET AND IT WAS GOING TO GROW, AND IT WAS GOING TO ACTUALLY BE A NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT ONCE, OBVIOUSLY, PAPA PETER CAME IN AND THE STENCH OF DANNON, WHO WOULD HAVE EVER KNOWN IN THE MORNINGS LIKE IT WAS BAD. BUT BACK TO JUST KNOWING THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD, WHETHER IT'S A GAS STATION WHERE IT'S RETAIL SPACE. I MEAN, IT DOESN'T WORK WITH WHAT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IS. WELL, AS A YOUNG, AS A YOUNG HOMEOWNER WAS COMING IN FOR I. SO IT'S JUST REALLY DEPRESSING TO KNOW THAT THAT THE VALUE AND I'M A MORTGAGE LOAN OFFICER, AND I'VE BEEN A MORTGAGE LOAN OFFICER FOR 25 YEARS, AND THAT 1,000% IS GOING TO LOWER THE VALUE OF OUR HOMES. OF ALL THOSE HOMES IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. SO PLEASE DON'T. I MEAN, IF IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A CATHOLIC CHURCH, I FEEL LIKE IF IT'S NOT GOING TO BE THAT, THEN IT HAS TO BE HOMES SO THAT IT FEELS LIKE A NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT DOESN'T FEEL THAT WE'RE SURROUNDED BY BEEPING NOISE AT NIGHT BECAUSE THE TRUCKS BACKING UP. AND I MEAN, I WAKE UP TO THAT EVERY SINGLE MORNING.

AND IT REALLY IS SO SAD BECAUSE I'M LIKE, YOU KNOW. AND SO AGAIN, I AM A MORTGAGE LOAN OFFICER. I KNOW THAT BY PUTTING THAT IN TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'S GOING TO DECREASE THE VALUE OF OUR HOME. SOMETHING THAT MYSELF AND ALL MY NEIGHBORS HAVE PROBABLY WORKED REALLY HARD TO, YOU KNOW, TO ACHIEVE THE EQUITY IN THAT PROPERTY, IN OUR PROPERTIES. SO, YEAH, FOR OUR FAMILIES, FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, PLEASE DON'T PUT COMMERCIAL ANYTHING COMMERCIAL.

THERE'S ENOUGH COMMERCIAL AROUND US. WE HAVE TO TRY TO KEEP THAT SO THAT WE FEEL LIKE WE ACTUALLY ARE PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PEOPLE ACROSS FROM US AND THE PARK THAT'S THERE, YOU KNOW, CLOSE TO US AS WELL. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME ON UP. AS ALWAYS. NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE, PLEASE. MY NAME IS BRETT LOVELL. I RESIDE IN RIVERTON, BUT WE OWN PROPERTY. QUITE A BIT OF

[01:10:03]

PROPERTY AND OFFICE OUT OF WEST JORDAN. A LOT OF TIMES IN DEVELOPMENT, THERE'S NOT A LOT, YOU KNOW, THE PEOPLE THAT ARE OKAY WITH IT DON'T COME OUT TO THE MEETING AND JUST WANTED TO COME OUT AND SAY THAT BEING A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPER, THIS SITE WOULDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL. IT WOULD BE A STRUGGLE AS FAR AS SAFETY AND TRAFFIC. SO I JUST AS BEING A PROFESSIONAL IN THIS INDUSTRY, JUST WANTED TO COME OUT AND SAY THIS MAKES A LOT MORE SENSE AS FAR AS TRAFFIC AND AND WHATNOT. TO BE A COMMERCIAL SITE VERSUS RESIDENTIAL IS HOLIDAY OIL OR A C STORE WOULD BE JUST TRAFFIC COMING THROUGH. NOT REALLY A DESTINATION. JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT AND WORKED WITH SOME OF YOU ON COUNCIL AND CALVIN. I DON'T FEEL THE WAY OTHER PEOPLE DID. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP IN THE PAST. APPRECIATE YOU. MERRY CHRISTMAS, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'LL KEEP IT OPEN. ANYONE IN THE ROOM? THANK YOU. NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. HI, MY NAME IS MATT CHEN. I ALSO A RESIDENT OF WEST JORDAN. MY BACKYARD IS THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THIS PROPOSED PROPERTY. I ECHO WHAT'S BEEN SAID BY MY NEIGHBORS. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS ZONE CHANGE. I DO WANT TO TAKE THE COUNCIL BACK ABOUT, OH, BACK TO AUGUST OF THIS YEAR, WHERE I REPRESENTED MY FAMILY. FAMILY TRUST OF SOME PROPERTY ON DUNLOP DRIVE THAT IS VERY SIMILARLY SHAPED TRIANGLE PIECE THAT THERE WAS NOT A ZONE CHANGE, BUT AN OVERLAY GIVEN THAT ALLOWED SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS HOUSING ON A TRIANGLE PIECE THAT WAS ABOUT TWO AND A HALF ACRES, NOT THREE AND A HALF ACRES. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL RECALL THAT OR NOT. I THINK BEFORE THIS GOES TO A COMMERCIAL SITE, THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE DUE DILIGENCE GIVEN AND MORE OPPORTUNITY GIVEN TO COMPANIES LIKE GARBETT, WHO ARE ABLE TO WORK ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY VERY, VERY SIMILARLY SIZED AND BE PROFITABLE. WITH THAT, I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING WHAT HAPPENS ON THAT PROPERTY AND APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION AND NOT CHANGING THE ZONING ON THIS AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE TO POP UP? I'LL GO TO MR. ANDERSON. OH NO, WE DO HAVE ANOTHER. PLEASE COME ON IN. YOU KNOW THE DRILL.

SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH IT. SO I'M CHRIS MCCONAUGHEY, WESTERN RESIDENT. PLEASE FORGIVE ME IF I READ SOME THOUGHTS THAT I SCRIBBLED DOWN JUST TO MAKE SURE I CAN MAKE THE BEST USE OF THAT LIMITED TIME WE HAVE. I DO WANT TO THANK COUNCIL MEMBER WHITELOCK FOR POINTING OUT THAT THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS SHARED WAS CONCEPT ONLY, AND THERE'S NO COMMITMENT TO IT. IF IT'S IF A SUCCESSFUL REZONE HAPPENS TONIGHT, THAT PROPERTY COULD BE SOLD TO SOMEBODY ELSE WHO'S NOT TIED TO THE CONCEPT. AND ONCE THE ZONE CHANGE IS APPROVED, ANYTHING ALLOWED ALLOWED WITHIN THAT ZONE CHANGE DOESN'T REQUIRE FURTHER APPROVAL FROM THE COUNCIL. BUT CONSIDERING THE CONCEPT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY THE THE STRIP MALL COMPONENT, I WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER HOW MANY RETAIL SITES ARE ALREADY STRUGGLING OR EMPTY. ALONG 90TH SOUTH, YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS THAT STRUGGLE. 78TH HAS QUITE A FEW 70TH AS WELL, I DON'T KNOW. AND THOSE ARE LARGER SITES AT JUST OVER THREE ACRES. I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS SITE HAS ENOUGH POTENTIAL FOR CRITICAL MASS TO BE SUCCESSFUL FOR WHAT THE CONCEPT PLAN IS SUGGESTING. UNLESS, OF COURSE, YOU'RE LOOKING FOR POSSIBLE LOCATIONS FOR SPIRIT HALLOWEEN.

BUT ASIDE FROM THAT, DOES R1 TEN WORK? PROBABLY NOT, BUT I WOULD PREFER TO SEE SOMETHING CLOSER TO THE CONCEPT, CLOSER TO WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING HAS. I'D ALSO POINT OUT I DON'T NEED TO POINT OUT THAT THE COUNCIL, I'M SURE, IS COGNIZANT THAT THE RESIDENTS HERE PURCHASED HOMES WITH THE ANTICIPATION THAT THIS WOULD BE A RESIDENTIAL OR THE CHURCH. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THE RESIDENTIAL, AND THAT'S KIND OF THE EXPECTATION. WE KNOW THAT PLANS CHANGE, BUT WE WANT TO AT LEAST TRY TO BE CLOSE TO THE ORIGINAL AND THE EXISTING PLAN THAT'S OUT THERE NOW. IT'S NOT THE COUNCIL'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE ZONING CHANGES TO HELP MAKE THINGS PENCIL FOR DEVELOPMENT. RATHER, THE COUNCIL'S ROLE IS TO PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS. THE DEVELOPER HAS EVERY RIGHT IN THE WORLD TO ASK FOR THE CHANGE, BUT THE COUNCIL DOES NOT HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO APPROVE THAT CHANGE. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE NO WITH THAT. I DO ALSO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. IT'S A VERY DIFFICULT POSITION, ALMOST THANKLESS TO BE IN WHERE YOU'RE SITTING AND WEIGHING BOTH SIDES OF SOMETHING. THAT CAN BE HONESTLY A PRETTY HEATED, PRETTY HEATED QUESTION. THIS HAS A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON PEOPLE'S LIVES. PEOPLE'S HOMES LIKELY ONE OF THE BIGGEST INVESTMENTS THEY'VE EVER MADE, NOT JUST IN FINANCIAL TERMS OF THE COST OF THE HOME, BUT WHERE THEY'RE RAISING THEIR FAMILY

[01:15:05]

AND HOW THEY'RE SPENDING THEIR LIFE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR CONSIDERATION, AND FOR THE TWO OF YOU WHO ARE LEAVING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. I ENJOYED MY TIME SERVING WITH BOTH OF YOU. CHAIR. VICE CHAIR. WISH YOU THE BEST. COUNCIL MEMBER. COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN AS WELL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ONE MORE TIME. ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? AND, MR. HENDERSON, DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? OH, WE'VE GOT ONE MORE.

BUT DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE? JUST SO I'LL KNOW. RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE TWO ONLINE. NO ONE HAS RAISED THEIR HAND TO SPEAK. NOW THE ANTICIPATION HAS GONE FOR ME. BUT I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO YOU. MA'AM, PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. HI, SHELLEY. CARLYLE, WEST JORDAN I HAVE BEEN A WEST JORDAN RESIDENT SINCE FEBRUARY OF 1999. I'VE LIVED IN THE SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOOD SINCE 2006. BEFORE WE BUILT, I DID MY DUE DILIGENCE. I LOOKED AT THE PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR PATHS, AND I SEARCHED AND EVERYTHING AROUND OUR SUBDIVISION WAS ZONED R1 TEN EXCEPT FOR I WAS AWARE OF PLASTIC CABINETS. WHO WAS THERE AT THE TIME, WHICH IS NOW PAPA PIZZA OR THE BAKERY. AND WE WERE AWARE OF DANNON. SO I WAS VERY AWARE THAT I WAS BUILDING A HOME, THAT ALL THE HOMES AROUND ME WOULD BE 10,000FT■!S R LARGER. THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE LAST 19.5 YEARS, I HAVE FAITHFULLY ATTENDED MEETINGS THAT HAVE COME UP, HAVING TO DO WITH 90TH SOUTH, GOING THROUGH NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY, POTENTIAL FLYOVERS OVER 6400 WEST. ALL THESE MEETINGS I'VE ATTENDED SINCE 2006 TO THE PRESENT.

LITTLE BY LITTLE, OUR LITTLE TRIANGLE NEIGHBORHOOD, EVERYTHING IS CHANGED. WE'LL SHARE APARTMENTS. THAT AREA WAS ZONED ALSO R1 TEN AND WE GOT SOMEONE GOT A LITTLE BIT SNEAKY.

THERE WAS A TOWN HALL. THERE WAS A MEETING TO CHANGE THE ZONING TO HIGHER DENSITY RESOLUTION. I DO REALIZE THAT WAS DURING 2008 AND NINE WHEN THE ECONOMY DID CHANGE, BUT LETTERS WERE MAILED OUT TO PEOPLE THAT LIVED WITHIN 100FT OF THAT. WELL, AT THE TIME, NOBODY LIVED WITHIN 100FT. SO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD GOT CHANGED TO APARTMENTS. SO NOW WE ARE JUST THIS LITTLE TINY TRIANGLE, AND THIS IS THE LAST, LITTLE BIT WE HAVE TO KEEP US FROM BEING COMPLETELY SURROUNDED ALMOST COMPLETELY BY COMMERCIAL. SO I WOULD JUST ASK THAT YOU CONSIDER US, YOU KNOW, COUNCILMAN BLOOM AND COUNCILMAN GREEN AS YOUR LAST ACTIVE SERVICE. WE WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO VOTE NO AGAINST THIS AS PART OF YOUR LEGACY. AND WE DO APPRECIATE ALL OF YOUR SERVICE. AND THANK YOU FOR HEARING OUR COMMENTS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I'M GOING TO ASSUME THAT NO ONE'S GOING TO STEP UP. YEP. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. WE'LL JUST.

NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE, PLEASE. MY NAME IS BRETT SEEGMILLER, WEST JORDAN I BACK MY BACKYARD BACKS THE PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. I ECHO IT ALL MY OTHER NEIGHBORS HAVE SAID SO I'LL BE BRIEF. I WAS AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A FEW WEEKS AGO, AND THIS WAS IN THE COMPLETE PACKET. AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT SHOWS THAT IT'S SORRY IN THE COMMITTEE THE WHOLE MINUTES. I'M ASSUMING THAT'S THIS IS WHERE I'M GETTING THIS FROM. SO IT TALKS ABOUT YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS PROPERTY. I'LL JUST BE BRIEF. I WON'T CALL YOUR NAMES, BUT A COUPLE COUNCIL MEMBERS SAID THERE'S ALREADY PLENTY OF COMMERCIAL BETWEEN MOUNTAIN VIEW AND U-111. AND NOW WITH EVERYTHING FROM 6400 WEST WHERE THE ELECTRIC COMPANIES GOING IN OUT THERE, THERE'S ALREADY PLENTY OF COMMERCIAL. YOU DON'T NEED ANY MORE. THAT WAS ECHOED BY ONE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS. YOU ALREADY KNOW ALL THE NEIGHBORS. WE'RE AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DON'T WANT THIS. AND I'LL LEAVE IT AT THIS. THE VERY LAST THING.

NO MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL INDICATED SUPPORT FOR THE CURRENT REQUEST MOVING FORWARD TO REZONE THIS. THAT WAS THE VERY LAST PARAGRAPH OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE OF THE WHOLE MINUTE. SO PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT REZONE THIS AGAIN. WE'RE AMENABLE TO CHANGING TO LIKE WHAT CHRIS SAID, SOME DIFFERENT ZONING OPTIONS FOR HOMEBUILDERS. BUT PLEASE DO NOT REZONE THIS TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. COME ON UP. WHOEVER'S NEXT, GIVE ME YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. HI. MY NAME IS STAN. WEST JORDAN RESIDENT. MY HOME SITS BASICALLY AT THE ENTRANCE OF WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REZONE. PERSONALLY, THIS JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO OPEN UP TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. IT MAKES SENSE TO HAVE. IF YOU LET ME PUT YOUR AS IF THIS WAS YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE HAVE A MAVERICK RIGHT ON MOUNTAIN VIEW.

[01:20:03]

GREAT. WE HAVE U-111. WE HAVE ANOTHER GAS STATION RIGHT THERE. THOSE MAKE SENSE. I HAVE YOUNG KIDS BASICALLY WOULD CROSS THE STREET INTO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, POTENTIALLY GET HURT, GET HIT.

ALSO TO MENTION 90TH SOUTH NOW THAT IT OPENED UP TO U-111 WITHIN 24 HOURS, THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT OF IT OPENING. IT JUST DOESN'T IT? IT'S ART. LIKE YOU SAID. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAID IT'S ALREADY TOO NOISY. I WOULD AGREE, WE HEAR STUFF ALL NIGHT. WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR TRUCKS BACKING UP. WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR ALL THIS RIFF RAFF GOING ON AT A GAS STATION. SO I WOULD I'M BEGGING YOU TO SAY NO. AND LET'S LOOK AT OTHER OPTIONS. THANKS. THANK YOU. I KNOW WE HAVE ONE ONLINE. DO I HAVE ANYONE ELSE IN THE ROOM WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? PLEASE COME ON UP, MA'AM. AS MY BROKEN RECORD WILL SAY, PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE, PLEASE. KELLY LEWIS, WESTERN RESIDENT. AND I'M A FEW DOORS DOWN FROM THIS PROPOSED AREA WHERE THEY'RE ASKING FOR THE CHANGE. AND I JUST WANTED TO SHARE. I'VE LIVED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SINCE 2006 AND HAVE SPENT MANY, MANY HOURS WALKING FROM MY HOME DOWN 90TH AND AROUND TO THE BALLPARK. SO LOTS OF YEARS SPENT THERE, LOTS OF YEARS WALKING BACK AND FORTH.

AND I JUST AM ANTICIPATING, I THINK THE THE MAN THAT TALKED AT THE BEGINNING TALKED ABOUT THE SAFETY CONCERNS THAT WE BROUGHT UP AS AS NEIGHBORS AND THE IDEA THAT PUTTING A GAS STATION THERE SO CLOSE TO THAT BALLPARK, SO CLOSE TO THAT HUGE REGIONAL PARK, IS JUST GOING TO BRING THOSE KIDS, ALL THE SKATERS, ALL THE BIKE RIDERS THAT WOULD BE THE CLOSEST GAS STATION, AND IT WOULD BRING THEM ACROSS 90TH. HE MENTIONED THAT HAVING RESIDENTIAL HOMES, THERE WOULD ALSO BE A SAFETY CONCERN, BUT I THINK IT'S A DIFFERENT IDEA WHEN THEY'RE CROSSING, COMING OVER TO GET THEIR SNACKS AND THINGS FROM FROM THAT AREA, FROM THE PARK.

AND JUST WITH ALL THE CHANGES THAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE ROADS, WITH US BEING KIND OF ISOLATED AND SMALL FOR SO LONG, IT'S REALLY, REALLY SCARY. THE KIDS ARE NOT USED TO HAVING TRAFFIC AND THEY'RE NOT USED TO THOSE CHANGES. AND IT IT WILL THERE WILL BE LIVES LOST, I CAN PROMISE YOU THAT. AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE YOU KNOW, WHAT WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT. AND WHAT WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT IS THE SAFETY OF OUR FAMILIES. THANKS. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS ADAM BECK. I'M WITH JORDAN RESIDENT. I ALSO LIVE ON THE STREET THAT'S RIGHT UP AGAINST THIS PROPERTY. I JUST WANT TO REITERATE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN SAID. YOU KNOW, WE'RE OBVIOUSLY OPPOSED TO THIS FOR SEVERAL REASONS. YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF FRUSTRATIONS FROM THE PEOPLE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE PAST WITH THE WITH THE ROAD CHANGES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I THINK THERE'S STILL UNRESOLVED CONCERNS ABOUT SAFETY FOR CROSSING THE STREET. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THIS LITTLE CORNER TRIANGLE. I DON'T THINK THOSE HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. AND I THINK THIS ONLY SERVES TO WORSEN THE PROBLEMS THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE IN THAT AREA. WE ARE DEFINITELY WORRIED ABOUT OUR KIDS. I THINK I DON'T WE MOVED IN WHEN WE HAD FIVE YOUNG KIDS. THEY'RE THEY'RE A LITTLE OLDER NOW, BUT I KNOW THAT IF IF I WERE LOOKING AT THAT SAME PROPERTY TODAY, I'D HAVE. AND THERE WAS ALL THE THE ROAD CHANGES AND ALL THE, THE, THE COMMERCIAL CHANGES, I, I'D FEEL VERY DIFFERENTLY ABOUT ABOUT BUYING IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. PLEASE KEEP OUR, OUR QUALITY OF LIFE THERE. PLEASE LOOK OUT FOR OUR KIDS AND AND VOTE NO AGAINST THIS. THANKS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE IN THE ROOM WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE, PLEASE. MOLLY WARNICK AND I LIVE IN WEST JORDAN. I ACTUALLY LIVE JUST DOWN 90TH SOUTH FROM WHERE THE PROPOSED STRIP MALL AND GAS STATION WOULD BE PUT IN. I AM ACUTELY AWARE OF SAFETY CONCERNS RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE I LIVE AT THE INTERSECTION OF 6,490TH, AND RECENTLY A VEHICLE WENT STRAIGHT THROUGH MY BACKYARD AND INTO MY YARD. IF IT WASN'T FOR A TRAMPOLINE, THE POLICE OFFICER SAID THAT THEY BELIEVE HE WOULD HAVE HIT MY HOUSE. SO I'M VERY AWARE OF SAFETY. SAFETY CONCERNS FOR TRAFFIC. DEFINITELY GOING DOWN THAT ROAD AND LOOKING AT THAT MAP THAT WAS SHOWN, IT IS CORRECT THAT IF YOU'RE GOING WEST ON 90TH, YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO TURN INTO THE GAS STATION.

[01:25:04]

BUT WE'RE ALL HUMAN AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO MAKE A U-TURN. THEY'RE GOING TO U-TURN RIGHT THERE BEHIND SOME OF THESE HOMES, AND THEY'RE GOING TO GO STRAIGHT INTO THE GAS STATION.

SO THAT IS A CONCERN, A SAFETY CONCERN THAT I HAVE THOUGHT OF. I THINK AS OUR NEIGHBORS HAVE SAID, WE HAVE A MAVERICK JUST DOWN THE STREET AT MOUNTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR, THERE'S A HOLIDAY GAS STATION. ON BACK IS THERE'S ANOTHER HOLIDAY GAS STATION BEING BUILT OFF OF 7800.

WE WE DON'T CARE FOR ANOTHER GAS STATION. WE DON'T NEED ONE. WE CAN GO GET GAS AT MAVERICK.

WE CAN GO GET GAS AT SAM'S CLUB. WE DON'T NEED ONE IN OUR BACKYARD. WITH AMAZON BEING JUST DOWN THE ROAD. WE HAVE ALL SEEN AMAZON TRUCKS AT MAVERICK. THEY'RE THERE A LOT FILLING UP BEFORE THEY'RE DONE WITH THEIR SHIFT. I CAN FORESEE THEM WANTING TO USE THAT HOLIDAY GAS STATION THAT WILL JUST INCREASE TRAFFIC. IT WILL INCREASE SAFETY CONCERNS ALONG WITH SAFETY CONCERNS. THERE'S A LOT OF RIFT RAFT THAT IS BROUGHT IN WITH GAS STATIONS. IT'S JUST HOW IT IS. WE DON'T WANT THAT IN OUR BACKYARD. LIKE OUR NEIGHBORS HAVE SAID, WE WE WANT A NEIGHBORHOOD. WE WANT A NEIGHBORHOOD FEELING. AND BY PUTTING IN BUSINESSES AND A GAS STATION, THAT'S GOING TO LOSE OUR SENSE OF COMMUNITY, OUR SENSE OF NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE ALL WANTED AND WE STILL WANT. SO I WOULD URGE YOU TO CONSIDER TO NOT REZONE THIS TO COMMERCIAL, BECAUSE AS RESIDENTS OF WEST JORDAN, WE WANT A NEIGHBORHOOD FEELING IN OUR SMALL PART OF WEST JORDAN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I'LL ASK AGAIN, ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO STAND UP AND TALK? MR. ANDERSON, DO WE STILL HAVE ONE PERSON WITH A HAND RAISED ONLINE? YOU HAVE TWO INDIVIDUALS. ONE HAS RAISED THEIR HAND. COOL. WE WILL OPEN IT UP SO THEY CAN SPEAK PLEASE, ONLINE. IF YOU'RE GOING TO SPEAK, START WITH YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE, PLEASE. I'M CUEING IT AND THERE'S NOT A RESPONSE AT THE MOMENT. ALL RIGHT. IF YOU ARE ONLINE I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. THIS IS YOUR TIME. IS THERE A NAME? YEAH, IT'S DYLAN MARTIN. DALEN, IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK. THE LINE IS OPEN FOR YOU. ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. WITH THAT BEING SAID, IF THERE'S NO ONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION OF THIS. WE THANK YOU ALL FOR ALL OF YOUR ALL OF YOUR WORDS.

THESE THINGS DO BECOME VERY HARD BECAUSE MOST CITIZENS THINK WE ONLY LISTEN TO DEVELOPERS, AND MOST DEVELOPERS THINK WE ONLY LISTEN TO CITIZENS. AND THE HARD PART IS WE HAVE TO LISTEN TO BOTH. AND IT WAS SAID THAT OUR JOB IS TO DO WHAT THE VOTING PEOPLE TELL US TO DO. BUT REALLY, WHAT OUR JOB IS TO DO IS WHAT WE DEEM IS THE BEST POSSIBLE THING FOR THE CITY. AND SOMETIMES THAT MEANS GOING ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. BUT IN ORDER TO GET THE BEST THING FOR THE CITY, WE DO HAVE TO LISTEN TO BOTH SIDES. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I KNOW THAT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS DO HERE. AND IT IS HARD WITH A TO LIVE IN A PLACE THAT'S ON A GRID SYSTEM, AND TO HAVE A DIAGONAL ROAD JUST SUDDENLY BUST THROUGH EVERYTHING, IT KIND OF MESSES UP. A LOT OF THE PLANNING THAT WENT THROUGH. IT ALSO HURTS THAT WHEN WE ARE DOING A POSSIBLE THIS IS SET FOR A REZONING THAT OFTENTIMES THE PEOPLE ASKING FOR THE REZONE DON'T HAVE THE EXACT PLANS YET, BECAUSE THAT COST A LOT OF MONEY TO BUILD THOSE EXACT PLANS, AND THEY DON'T WANT TO SPEND THAT MONEY IF IT'S NOT GOING TO BE REZONED. SO THIS IS ALWAYS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO WEIGH VERY HEAVILY WHEN WE GO INTO A REZONING. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THOSE COMMENTS, AND NOW WE'LL OPEN UP TO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WITH ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE SOME AS WELL, BUT I'LL HOLD OFF RIGHT NOW. I'LL LET COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB START. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. CORBIN. I THINK I'LL START WITH YOU AND YOU CAN TELL ME WHERE MAYBE IT SHOULD GO. AND THAT'S REGARDING THE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROAD, THE SALE OF THE ROAD. WHERE ARE WE IN THAT PROCESS? WHERE IS UDOT? I GUESS IT'S NOT REALLY US. WHERE IS UDOT IN THAT PROCESS? WHAT ARE WE? WHERE ARE WE IN, IN. I DON'T SEE OUR PUBLIC WORKS OR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STAFF HERE. I CAN SPEAK TO MY KNOWLEDGE. PAUL MAY CORRECT ME. THE ROAD HAS THE THE INTERSECTION HAS BEEN PRELIMINARILY DESIGNED. UDOT HAS TO APPROVE IT. MY

[01:30:09]

UNDERSTANDING IS THERE'S AN UPDATE BEING RE-ENGINEERED BY UDOT AT THE MOMENT AND I DON'T KNOW I DON'T KNOW THE NEW TIME FRAME. DO WE KNOW ABOUT PROPERTY CHANGING HANDS BETWEEN UDOT AND EITHER THE CHURCH OR MYSELF, OR THE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH? THAT'S GOING TO GET A CHUNK CUT OUT OF IT TO TO CURB THAT ROAD TO THE NORTH? YEAH, WE'LL HAVE TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF, SORRY, THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY TO GET AFFECT THE BAND IN NEW BINGHAM HIGHWAY TO CREATE A CREATE THE DESIRED INTERSECTION. AND THEN THAT WOULD LEAVE US REMNANT PROPERTY THAT WE WOULD THEN SELL ON THE NORTH SIDE WHERE THIS TRIANGLE IS, IS. SO TALK ABOUT. BUT THAT HAS NOT BEEN AFFECTED A SWAP OF SOME KIND BUT THAT CORRECT? DO WE KNOW IF THE WAY THAT IT'S GOING TO BE IS WHAT'S PICTURED ON THIS SITE PLAN CONCEPT. ON THIS, ON THIS SOUTH OF 90TH SIDE THAT YOU SEE ON THE SITE PLAN CONCEPT. YES. I THINK FROM ALL INDICATIONS, THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE INTERSECTION IS IF NOT FINALIZED, BUT THE CONCEPT IS VERY CLOSE. YEAH. THAT WON'T THAT WILL NOT DRAMATICALLY CHANGE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANKS. I HAVE A QUESTION AS WELL FOR THE CITY. THE CITIZENS HAVE SAID THAT THEY ARE OKAY WITH HIGHER DENSITY HOUSING IN THAT. HOW IS THE CITY SET FOR HIGHER DENSITY HOUSING IN THAT IN TERMS OF WATER AND POWER? I WILL BRING UP MR. MCCANDLESS HERE FOR THAT. THANK YOU. THIS WILL HAPPEN. IF IT'S ZONED FOR MULTIFAMILY, THEY'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH A A REVIEW OR FORMAL REVIEW TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'VE GOT ENOUGH. THE BUT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MULTIFAMILY, THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT FACTORS THAT KIND OF PLAY INTO THIS. IT'S THE THE OVERALL DIMENSION OF THE THE PROPERTY ITSELF. IT'S I CAN SO IT IT'S, IT'S THAT THAT PLAYS INTO IT THE SERVICEABILITY. IT'S ALSO THE LIMITATIONS ON THE NUMBER OF ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ARE AVAILABLE FOR THIS TO ALLOW THE MULTIFAMILY. WE'RE STILL UNDER THE CAP AND GRADE, BUT THERE ARE OTHER MAYBE 1 OR 2 OTHER OPTIONS THAT MIGHT ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY AS MULTIFAMILY. BUT IT MAY IT MAY TAKE A ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. BUT OKAY. THANK YOU. THE HARD PART IS THAT WHAT IT IS ZONED FOR IS NOT GOOD FOR ANYTHING TO REALLY GO THERE. AND WHAT IT WAS BEST SET FOR WAS THE CHURCH.

THAT'S I THINK THAT WAS GOING TO BE THE BEST POSSIBLE OUTCOME FOR THAT. BUT THAT'S NOT WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW. COUNCIL MEMBER BLUM I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS A DIFFICULT SITUATION BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY SITS BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, ARTERIAL ROADS, INDUSTRIAL USES, AND THERE'S NO OPTION HERE THAT IS IMPACT FREE. SO TONIGHT'S DECISION IS ABOUT LAND USE POLICY AND NOT ABOUT DISMISSING THE CONCERNS OF THAT NEIGHBORS HAVE SHARED. AND TO ME, THIS VOTE IS NOT ABOUT GAS STATIONS OR CAR WASHES OR EVEN WAGSTAFF.

I FEEL THIS IS DO WE ABSORB NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL IMPACTS, OR DO WE KEEP IT RESIDENTIAL AND ABSORB MATERIAL INDUSTRIAL IMPACTS? BOTH HAVE THESE TRADE OFFS. AND THE DIFFICULTY IS, IS THAT NEITHER OPTION FEELS GOOD TO THE NEIGHBORS. AND AND THOUGH THE OPTIONS CAN BE JUSTIFIED, IT DOESN'T MEAN OR APPROPRIATE IMPACTS CAN'T BE MITIGATED LATER. COMMERCIAL IS LESS AFFECTED BY NOISE, BUT THAT'S NOT THE SAME AS SAYING COMMERCIAL IS BETTER FOR THE RESIDENTS, OR THAT COMMERCIAL ALIGNS MORE CLOSELY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. I MEAN, IN FACT, THE GENERAL PLAN KIND OF CUTS IT BOTH WAYS WHERE IT SAYS THE GENERAL PLAN IS THE WILL OF THE COMMUNITY, AND PRESUMED CURRENT DEVELOPERS HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF. AND IF WE GET THIS REZONE, ANY PERMITTED USE IN THAT ZONE MAY OCCUR. AND WE'VE BEEN WE'VE WE'VE WE'VE HIT THAT ROAD BEFORE WHERE WE, WE'VE WE'VE APPROVED SOMETHING AND THEN IT HAS BIT US IN THE BUTT AND LIKE, WE CAN'T BLOCK A GAS STATION IF THE CODE ALLOWS IT, YOU KNOW, BUFFERS AND LIGHTING AND ACCESS CONTROLS HAPPEN LATER. BUT ONCE WE APPROVE THIS, THE USE INTENSITY IS IS LOCKED AND FOR FOR THE RESIDENTS WORRIED TONIGHT I GET IT.

THEY'RE VOTE TONIGHT. THIS VOTE TONIGHT IS THE REAL REAL LAST LEVERAGE POINT. SO THE QUESTIONS THAT I ASKED I WAS LIKE WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS IN THE COMMITTEE OF WHOLE, WE WANTED TO SEE HOW THAT, THAT, THAT THE ROAD WAS GOING TO DEVELOP AND THE BURDEN OF THE

[01:35:03]

PROOF FROM, FROM THE DEVELOPER DIDN'T CHANGE THAT. WE I STILL WANT TO KNOW, LIKE, I'M GLAD YOU ASKED THE QUESTION BECAUSE LIKE, HOW IS THIS GOING TO DEVELOP WITH UDOT AND IF THE COMMERCIAL IS APPROVED, WHAT ASSURANCE EXISTS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE USES WILL PREVAIL OVER, YOU KNOW, A BAIT AND SWITCH POTENTIALLY. AND SO I JUST WANT TO THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT SITUATION. THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT PIECE OF PARCEL. AND SO ALL OF THIS IS OBVIOUSLY GOING THROUGH A LOT OF OUR HEADS. AND SO I WANT THE RESIDENTS TO KNOW THAT WE'RE NOT TAKING THIS VOTE LIGHTLY, HOWEVER IT GOES, WHETHER FROM THE FROM THE LANDOWNER TO THE RESIDENTS, WE WE'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT DO WE VOTE NO OR DO WE CONTINUE THE ITEM? WE'RE TRYING. THERE'S A LOT THERE'S A LOT GOING ON WITH THIS VOTE, AND WE'RE TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY.

COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN, BEFORE MY COMMENTS, I HAVE A QUESTION. MR. MCCANDLESS. YOU MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER IT OR MR. LANGFORD, THE CURRENT NUMBER OF ER ASSIGNED TO THIS UNIT IS HOW MANY? AND IF WE GO TO THE REZONE ON THE SC ONE, HOW MANY ERCS WOULD BE ASSOCIATED TO THAT FOR, FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT DON'T UNDERSTAND IRC, IT STANDS FOR EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL, SOMETHING WE USED TO CALL IT ERA'S EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNIT. EVERY PIECE OF LAND IN THE CITY ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND EVERYTHING IS ASSIGNED A WATER, AN IRC COUNT THAT TELLS YOU HOW MUCH AND MOST HOUSES. MOST QUARTER ACRE HOUSES HAVE ABOUT ONE IRC PLUS OR MINUS. I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT NUMBERS THAT RIGHT RAY OR OR A 8000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS ONE IRC.

SO TELL US WHAT THE IRC COUNT IS ON THE CURRENT PROPERTY, WHAT IT WOULD BE FOR THE NEW ONE. I THINK WITH THAT, THE IRC COUNT IS GOING TO BE THE R1 TEN ZONE, AND SO I THINK YOU'RE PRETTY CLOSE ON THAT. I DON'T THINK IT'S MUCH DIFFERENT WITH THE WITH THE COMMERCIAL. OKAY.

THANK YOU CHAIR, IF I MAY ANSWER THAT QUESTION A LITTLE BIT, I DID HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH GREG DAVENPORT, WHO'S THE UTILITY MANAGER. CURRENTLY THAT PARCEL HAS 4.25 IRC PER ACRE, WHICH SUPPORTS 12 UNITS OF R1 TEN. IF IT'S ZONED TO AN SC ONE, THEN THE IRC COUNT WOULD BE 1.8 UNITS PER ACRE, AND THE COUNCIL WOULD BE ABLE TO WHAT HE TERMED BANK THE DIFFERENCE SO THAT THAT DIFFERENCE OF WATER, NOT THE PIPES, NOT THE TANKS AND SUCH, BUT THAT DIFFERENCE OF 2.5 IRC PER ACRE, YOU COULD BANK AND MOVE TO OTHER DEVELOPMENTS WHICH YOU HAVE DISCUSSED IN THE PAST OF TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. IF YOU WERE TO GO TO, FOR EXAMPLE, I WAS ASKED WHAT IF IT WENT TO 35 TOWNHOMES? THAT WOULD BE AN INCREASE TO 13 IRC'S PER ACRE, AND THE COUNCIL THROUGH THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT WOULD NEED TO LOCATE THE EXTRA 8.75 IRC'S NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE WATER TO THAT PARCEL. THANK YOU FOR THAT, COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON. THANK YOU. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO REMIND THE COUNCIL THAT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND THESE RESIDENTS WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT, HAVE BEEN RECEIVING THE SHORT END OF THE STICK FOR DECADES. IT'S ALREADY BEEN SPOKEN ABOUT. THEY ARE ISOLATED AND THEY'RE BECOMING MORE ISOLATED BY THE EXTENSION OF 90TH SOUTH. I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT THERE ARE USES THAT COULD COME IN HERE. THAT WOULD BE AN ENHANCEMENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, PERHAPS A LIBRARY, A POLICE STATION, A CARE CENTER OR A FUNERAL HOME. THERE ARE THINGS THAT COULD BE DONE THAT ARE VALUABLE TO THE DEVELOPER AND TO THE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN CONSIDERED. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE MY FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS TO VOTE NO ON THIS REZONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN. OVER THE LAST SIX YEARS. YES, THIS WILL BE ONE OF MY LAST VOTES OVER THE LAST SIX YEARS. I WILL TELL YOU THAT LAND USE DECISIONS ARE SOME OF THE MOST DIFFICULT AND SOME OF THE MOST EMOTIONAL DECISIONS THAT WE HAVE TO FACE AS A CITY COUNCIL. LET ME JUST TELL YOU WHERE I'M GOING TO BE COMING FROM WHEN I

[01:40:04]

VOTE. FIRST OF ALL, WE CAN'T CONSIDER ANY OTHER PROPOSAL THAN TONIGHT. THE THE IT'S WE WE CAN'T VOTE TO DO ANYTHING BUT TO. TO VOTE EITHER YES OR VOTE NO ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. WELL, I APPRECIATE COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON'S SENTIMENT THAT WE CAN PUT SOMETHING ELSE THERE. WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY OTHER PROPOSAL TO PUT SOMETHING ELSE THERE.

LIBRARIES NOT GOING TO BE POSSIBLE BECAUSE THERE'S A LIBRARY JUST DOWN THE STREET.

THERE THAT THE REC CENTER IS GOING TO GO OVER IN THE PARK, THOSE KIND OF THINGS. WE ALREADY HAVE ANOTHER PLACE, A SIGN FOR A FIRE STATION, A POLICE STATION IN, IN THE CITY.

AND I DON'T THINK THE CITY HAS THE APPETITE. BY THE WAY, IF MY NUMBERS ARE CORRECT, THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO SPEND ABOUT $3 MILLION TO BUY THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY, BECAUSE I'M I'M GOING TO GUESS THAT ON THOSE THREE ACRES, WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING AT SOMEPLACE BETWEEN 2.5 AND $3.25 MILLION INVESTMENT HERE. AND AND I CAN TELL YOU, THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE THAT MONEY, SO I'M NOT SURE THAT WE COULD DO THAT. THERE'S A COUPLE OTHER THINGS THAT THAT WILL GO INTO MY CONSIDERATION TONIGHT. NUMBER ONE, IT'S IT'S INTERESTING AND I, I WOULD ACTUALLY AGREE WITH THE EDGE HOME ASSESSMENT THAT THE ONLY WAY TO MAKE ANYTHING POSSIBLE HERE IS PROBABLY ABOUT 20 UNITS AN ACRE. NOW, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT WHERE WHERE THE RESIDENTS ARE, BUT IF YOU WANT 60 UNITS IN YOUR BACKYARD, THAT'S WHAT YOU WOULD GET. AND I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT'S THAT'S ANY BETTER THAN A, THAN A GAS STATION, BECAUSE 60 UNITS OF RENTALS CAN BE VERY, VERY DIFFICULT AND VERY TRAFFIC INTENSIVE. SO AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY WE REALLY DON'T HAVE A LOT OF ZONES TO, YOU KNOW, THE MR. MCCANDLESS ALLUDED TO A COUPLE, BUT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A COUPLE OF STRETCHES TO GET A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY THERE. AND IF WE WENT MULTIFAMILY THERE, WE DON'T HAVE THE WATER. AND AND SO ONE OF THE DECISIONS THAT ONE OF THE FACTORS THAT'S GOING TO GO INTO MAKING ME MAKING MY DECISION TONIGHT IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE UTILITIES, BECAUSE DO WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO, TO, TO, TO, TO SUPPORT 35, 40, 50 DIFFERENT UNITS THERE OR THE WITH THE WITH THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THERE? IT'LL PROBABLY TAKE IT'LL TAKE LESS WATER THAN WHAT, A 12 UNIT OR LESS WATER THAN WHAT. IT'S WHAT IT'S ZONED FOR NOW. IT'S, IT'S INTERESTING. THE HARD ON ACOUSTICS QUESTION CUTS BOTH WAYS. YES. YOU YOU HEARD YOU HEARD THE THAT YOU HEARD MR. COLOSIMO FROM THE DIOCESE REPRESENTING THE DIOCESE SAY THAT THEY HAVING A HARD TIME WITH NOISE. WELL, THAT SAME HARD TIME WITH NOISE WOULD ALSO INFLUENCE WHAT WAS BUILT THERE BY A MULTIFAMILY OR BY A, BY A DEVELOPER OR HOUSING DEVELOPER. AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER THAT. AND DOES THAT MAKE THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY MORE UNATTRACTIVE BECAUSE OF THE NOISE AND PUTTING A GAS STATION THERE OR COMMERCIAL? THEY'RE NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE NOISE. AND SO THAT'S THAT'S ONE OF THE THE THINGS THAT THAT HAPPENS THERE. LIKE I SAID, I. I'M WORRIED ABOUT THE FACT THAT IF WE DID DO THIS, THERE'S, YOU KNOW, IT'D GO TO 20 UNITS AN ACRE. AND, AND THAT'S NOT THE BEST THE, THE INTERESTING THING ABOUT THIS REZONE IS THAT THE, THE, THE WAGSTAFF INVESTMENT WANTS TO REZONE IT TO SC ONE. WHAT I WILL POINT OUT IS THAT'S NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. AND SO THE QUESTION IS, IS CAN CAN NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COINCIDE SIDE BY SIDE. AND I WOULD TELL YOU THEY CAN I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE STREET SOUNDS YOU KNOW SOMETIMES YOU SEE THOSE POSTS ON FACEBOOK. YOU'RE DRIVING IN UTAH AND YOU KNOW WHERE YOU YOU SEE THE MOUNTAINS AND EVERYBODY TRIES TO GUESS WHERE THEY DRIVE. NEVER MIND. I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE STREET THE OTHER DAY, GOING TO A DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENT, AND IT WAS AMAZING TO ME ON THIS PARTICULAR STREET. HOW MANY COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES ARE MIXED IN BETWEEN HOMES? I WOULD

[01:45:05]

TELL YOU THE CORNER OF 17TH SOUTH AND 13TH EAST IS A PRIME EXAMPLE. I WOULD TELL YOU THAT THE CORNER OF KNIGHT SOUTH AND 13TH EAST IS A PRIME EXAMPLE. GOT A NEIGHBORHOOD GARAGE ON ONE CORNER AND A HOUSE IS RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO IT. AND SO. THE A COUPLE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT I WANT TO ADDRESS. I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, HOLIDAY OIL PROBABLY WANTS TO PUT A GAS STATION THERE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO STEAL CUSTOMERS FROM MAVERIK. DID I SAY THAT YOU I SEE A HEAD NOD. YEAH. THEY WANT TO STEAL THE CUSTOMERS FROM MAVERIK, BUT AT LEAST MAYBE ON THE WAY, ON THE WAY HOME FROM WORK, BECAUSE THEY CAN COME IN AND TURN RIGHT IN OFF AND DO BINGHAM HIGHWAY.

SO I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO SEE A LOT OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THERE. BUT ANYWAY, JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. THE ONE THING THAT I WILL WANT TO THAT I WANT TO COMMENT ON IS THE CITY COUNCIL HAVING A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE VOTING RESIDENTS. YES, WE DO, BUT I ALSO HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO A LANDOWNER AND IN MY MIND, THE LANDOWNER. THE DIOCESE OF SALT LAKE IS AS MUCH A CONSTITUENT OF MINE AS IS THE AS THE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND SO I HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, WHEN, WHEN YOU LOOK AT, YOU LOOK AT THINGS AND YOU LOOK AT THINGS LIKE THE EDGE HOMES LETTER, I THINK THAT PROVIDES ENOUGH THAT ONE AND A COUPLE OTHER THINGS THAT I'VE LEARNED SINCE THEN, I THINK ARE ENOUGH TO OVERCOME THE PRESUMPTION THAT THE GENERAL PLAN IS CORRECT AND THAT THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY MAY NEVER BE WHAT WE HAVE DESIGNATED IN THE GENERAL PLAN IS. IT IS DOES IT BETTER OFF COMMERCIAL IS. AND THE QUESTION THAT I HAVE TO ANSWER IN MY MIND IS A COMMERCIAL BUFFER BETTER THAN ADDING A BUNCH OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES AND THE TRAFFIC DUMPS INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? BECAUSE IF THE, IF A, IF THE RESIDENTS IF THERE WERE HOMES THAT WERE BUILT THERE ON THAT TRIANGLE PIECE OF LAND, THEY WOULD ENTER, THEY WOULD THEY WOULD CONNECT BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO THEY WOULD BECAUSE MAY BE ABLE TO GET A RIGHT HAND OUT, BUT I ALMOST GUARANTEE IT WOULD CONNECT TO 6250 WEST. AND CONNECTING TO THAT AND ADDING TRAFFIC TO THAT STREET MAY NOT BE THE BEST THING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS SOMEONE WHO HAD A AND I WILL TELL YOU, I THINK I TOLD SOME OF YOU AT THE TOWN HALL MEETING THAT I, THAT I ATTENDED, I GOT A PHONE CALL SEVERAL YEARS AGO ABOUT PUTTING A COMMERCIAL PIECE, A COMMERCIAL USE IN MY BACKYARD. AND I'LL TELL YOU WHAT THE COMMERCIAL USE IS A BETTER IS A BETTER NEIGHBOR THAN THE. NEIGHBORS. THAT WHEN, WHEN, WHEN THEY DECIDED TO BUILD AND PLOW IT AND PUT UP A FENCE, IT'S AMAZING HOW QUIET THE NEIGHBORHOOD GOT, BECAUSE I DIDN'T HAVE FOUR WHEELERS RIDING ON AN OPEN PIECE OF GROUND IN MY BACKYARD. IT'S INTERESTING THAT THE COMMERCIAL PIECE OF PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY MORE QUIET THAN THE RENTAL PROPERTY WAS NEXT DOOR, AND IN FACT, THE COMMERCIAL BECAME A GREAT BUFFER, AND THEY BUILT A NICE FENCE THAT I DON'T HAVE TO. I GOT A BETTER FENCE THAN I'LL EVER BUILD. SO I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHERE I'M COMING FROM IS THAT I HAVE TO BALANCE PROPERTY RIGHTS, YOUR RIGHTS VERSUS THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE RIGHTS. AND HONESTLY, YOU KNOW, IF WE IF WE VOTE NO TONIGHT, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE SAY, WELL, THAT'S GOING TO HOW BAD DOES THIS AFFECT SOMEBODY ELSE BECAUSE OF THE RIGHTS? AND I HAVE TO CONSIDER THAT I THINK THAT THE LOW DENSITY DESIGNATION ON THERE, I THINK WE'VE SEEN THAT THAT'S NO LONGER APPROPRIATE. SO EVENTUALLY IT'S GOING TO BE REZONED FOR SOMETHING. WHAT'S THE BEST REZONE FOR THIS AREA? AND WHEN WHEN I, WHEN I TAKE WHEN I, WHEN I VOTE TONIGHT IT WILL BE BECAUSE I BASED ON WHAT I THINK IS BEST FOR AN AREA AS A BUFFER BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST IT'S NOT JUST HOUSES, IT'S NOT JUST COMMERCIAL, BUT IT'S WHAT'S THE BEST BUFFER FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD TO. REDUCE THE IMPACTS, REDUCE THE IMPACTS OF. WHAT COULD BE THERE. AND SO

[01:50:15]

THAT WILL BE WHAT I MAKE MY DECISION ON. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER LAM. THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT. JUST LIKE ALL OF YOU THAT ARE HERE TONIGHT, ALL OF US ON THE DAIS HAVE BEEN AFFECTED ONE ONCE OR TWICE IN OUR YEARS LIVING IN WEST JORDAN.

AS FAR AS DEVELOPMENT GOES, BEFORE I WAS EVEN ON THE COUNCIL, OVER IN MY AREA OF 13TH WEST, A BIG APARTMENT COMPLEX WAS BUILT THAT WE WEREN'T WE WEREN'T FANS OF, AND BOTH A MAVERICK AND A HOLLY WERE BUILT. SO I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS WITH THE GAS STATIONS. I DO WANT TO START WITH 90TH SOUTH. WHEN I WAS ELECTED FOR MY SECOND TIME, COMING BACK FOR DISTRICT ONE, BEFORE CHRIS MCCONAUGHEY, WHO'S BEEN UP HERE BEFORE, WAS DISTRICT ONE, AND HE'S NOW MOVED OUT TO YOUR AREA, AND HE'S BEEN A BIG PROPONENT OF YOURS AND HAS TALKED TO ALL OF US AND KEPT US ABREAST OF WHAT'S GOING ON. AND SO THAT'S GREAT. SO THANKS TO CHRIS FOR LETTING US KNOW AND BEING PART OF YOUR COMMUNITY OVER THERE.

MY BIGGEST WORRY HAS ALWAYS BEEN 90TH SOUTH. YOU GUYS KNOW MORE THAN WE DO BECAUSE YOU LIVE OFF OF THAT, THAT THAT ROAD WAS BUILT THE WAY IT WAS AND THAT WESTERN WAS EVENTUALLY PUNCH IT THROUGH. LAST YEAR, I SENT A FEW DIFFERENT CONCEPTS TO BOTH THE MAYOR AND CITY STAFF. I SAID, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS INSTEAD? BECAUSE MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS HAVING ALL THAT TRAFFIC GOING 90TH WHEN IT'S GOING TO OPEN UP. I WANTED THE TRAFFIC TO KEEP ON GOING UP. NEW BINGHAM HEADING OUT TOWARDS COPPERTON SO YOUR MAIN TRAFFIC WOULD BE THERE. I FEEL THAT MY THOUGHTS AND MY DESIRES FOR WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WITH THAT INTERSECTION JUST THEY DIDN'T CARE. WE HAD UDOT, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S UDOT, BUT WHOEVER THE DESIGNERS OF OF THE INTERSECTION CAME TO US A FEW MONTHS AGO AND SHOWED US WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO. THEY HAD ABOUT 5 OR 6 CONCEPTS. I WAS NOT A FAN OF MOST OF THEM, AND BASICALLY I THINK THEY TOLD US WHAT CONCEPT THEY'RE GOING TO DO. AND AS YOU SAW IN THE MAP TONIGHT OF HOW THE TRIANGLE IS GOING TO BE AND HOW THEY HAD THE GAS STATION LAID OUT, THAT'S HOW IT'S GOING TO BE. 90 SOUTH IS GOING TO PUNCH THROUGH. THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO COME THROUGH, UNFORTUNATELY, AND UNFORTUNATELY, AS A CITY COUNCIL, WE DON'T GET THE FINAL SAY ON HOW THE ROAD IS PUT THROUGH THERE. WE CAN PUT OUR OUR THOUGHTS IN. WE CAN SEND STUFF TO THE MAYOR, WE CAN SEND STUFF TO CITIES, HAVE JUST LIKE YOU CAN. SO THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO COME THAT WAY. SO AS I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT AND I THOUGHT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S GOING TO BE THERE, OBVIOUSLY THE TWO BEST OPTIONS ARE ARE NOW GONE. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WILL NOT BE BUILDING THERE, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN THE BEST OPTION. SECONDLY, OUR INTENT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SECOND BEST OPTION. BUT IN THE 20 PLUS YEARS THAT THAT THAT YOUR NEIGHBOR HAS BEEN THERE, NOBODY HAS COME FORTH TO WANT TO BUILD THOSE TYPES OF HOMES THERE. I'M NOT A FAN OF THE BIG, HIGH DENSITY TOWNHOMES. AND I'LL TELL YOU WHY. BECAUSE IN ABOUT 10S, IN THE TIME I'VE BEEN HERE IN WEST JORDAN, I'VE HAD COMPLAINTS ABOUT THESE TOWNHOMES BEING BUILT WITH 60 UNITS AND ALL OF THE TRAFFIC FLOWING INTO THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND PEOPLE PARKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. AND SO I DO KNOW THAT IF 60 UNITS ARE BUILT THERE WITH HIGH DENSITY, YOU WILL SEE PARKING ON THAT STREET AND MAYBE ON YOUR OTHER STREETS AS WELL. AND SO I, I WORRY ABOUT THAT AS WELL. THE CONCEPT THAT THEY HAVE PUT TOGETHER TODAY, OBVIOUSLY THINGS CAN CHANGE, BUT AS I'VE TALKED WITH THEM AND AND GOTTEN THEIR INPUT ON WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO, THEY ARE COGNIZANT OF WHAT YOU GUYS WANT AS NEIGHBORS, AND THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S LOWER IMPACT ON YOU. AND THE ONE THING I SAID IS, IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT A GAS STATION THERE, DON'T PUT IT UP AGAINST THE HOUSES, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE ALL THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO BE. AND AS YOU SAW IN THE CONCEPT, THEY DID MOVE IT TOWARDS THE CORNERS. WELL, THE THE CAR WASH IS THE BIGGEST THING BECAUSE THE CAR WASH HAS THE NOISE WITH THE, WITH THE DRYERS THAT DRY THE, THE CARS AS THEY COME OUT. SO THE MOST NOISE COMING FROM THE GAS STATION WOULD BE ON THE CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION AWAY FROM THE HOMES. SO AS WE MAKE THIS VOTE TONIGHT. YES, IT'S DIFFICULT. ALL OF US CHOSE TO RUN FOR OFFICE AND MAKE THOSE DIFFICULT DECISIONS. AND WE PROBABLY HAVE ONE OF THESE, WHAT, ONCE EVERY SIX MONTHS THAT COMES UP. AND SOME OF US ARE THE BAD GUYS, SOME OF US ARE THE GOOD GUYS. AND AS WE MAKE THIS VOTE TONIGHT, JUST KNOW THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE BEST. NOT JUST FOR THE DEVELOPER, NOT JUST FOR THE CITY, BUT FOR EVERYONE IN THE ROOM. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB. THANK YOU. MY INITIAL FEELING ON THIS WAS GOING TO BE I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF REZONING THIS. WHILE THE ROAD ALIGNMENT IS NOT FINAL, BEING TOLD THAT IT'S MORE OR LESS FINAL KIND OF SETTLES THAT ISSUE. BUT IT'S NOT THE ONLY ISSUE. I AGREE WITH A LOT OF WHAT COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON WAS SAYING. I AGREE WITH WHAT COUNCILMEMBER LAMB WAS SAYING AS FAR AS WHAT THE COUNCIL, AS REPRESENTING THE RESIDENTS HERE WANTED TO SEE HAPPEN WITH THE

[01:55:04]

ROADS IN THAT AREA WHERE THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT FROM UDOT THAT DUCK CREEK WAY INTERSECT WITH 90TH SOUTH, THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT. UDOT DOESN'T CONTROL DUCK CREEK WAY. IF WE WANT TO PUT A WALL THERE, WE COULD HAVE PUT A WALL THERE. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT'S HAPPENING.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN A THREE WAY INTERSECTION INSTEAD OF A FOUR WAY INTERSECTION, FOR EXAMPLE.

THE THE INPUT THAT THE COUNCIL HAD ON THAT ROAD ALIGNMENT WAS JUST SIMPLY NOT. WELL, I WON'T SAY IT WASN'T CONSIDERED BECAUSE SOME COUNCIL MEMBERS DID LIKE WHAT'S GOING IN AND SOME WANTED IT DIFFERENT. SO I GUESS SOME OF IT WAS HERS, MAYBE SOME OF IT WASN'T. OR AT LEAST NOT, YOU KNOW, PERSUASIVELY ENOUGH. BUT I AGREE WITH COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON. THE 90TH SOUTH PUNCHING THROUGH KIND OF BEING PAST OUR POINT OF HAVING CONTROL OVER IT IS IS NOW WHAT IT IS. SO NOW I LOOK AT WHAT WHAT CAN WE DO? WHAT'S WHAT'S THE BEST? YOU KNOW, IN 12 YEARS OF DOING THIS, HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IS NOT ON THE TABLE TONIGHT. OR HIGHER DENSITY. I WON'T SAY HIGH DENSITY BECAUSE THAT GIVES THAT PRODUCES DIFFERENT IMAGES IN EVERYBODY'S MIND, BUT MORE DENSE THAN THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT ON THE TABLE. IT'S NOT WHAT'S BEING ASKED FOR. WE CAN EITHER VOTE FOR THE STATUS QUO OR WE CAN VOTE FOR THE REQUEST. I WISH WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO JUST SAY, OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO REZONE IT SOMETHING ELSE, AND GOOD LUCK. BUT IT'S NOT OUR PROPERTY, SO WE CAN'T DO THAT.

SO AS AS FOR TONIGHT, I'M GOING TO BE A, A, A NO OR A VOTE TO NOT APPROVE FOR THE REASONS I MENTIONED IN THE COMMITTEE THE WHOLE MEETING. I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S THE RIGHT FIT.

THERE'S A GREAT PARCEL, JUST TWO AND A HALF BLOCKS TO THE WEST OF THIS. IF YOU WANT TO PUT ONE ON 64TH AND NEW BINGHAM, I THINK THAT'S A GREAT PARCEL FOR A HOLIDAY GAS STATION, AND I THINK IT WOULD GET JUST AS MUCH THROUGH TRAFFIC STOPPING IN THERE AND AND STUFF. IT'S GOOD TO SEE THE WAGSTAFFE GUYS. BY THE WAY, I USED TO WORK AT SINCLAIR OIL A LONG TIME AGO, SO I USED TO DEAL WITH YOU GUYS ALL THE TIME, BUT IT'S BEEN 20, YOU KNOW, 15 YEARS. ANYWAY, IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU GUYS, BUT I'M GOING TO BE A NO ON THIS. IT'S IT'S A TO ME IT'S NOT THE RIGHT FIT. AND AND I AGREE WITH SOME OF WHAT THE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS, HAS BROUGHT UP OBVIOUSLY MANY OF THE CONCERNS, MANY OF THE CONCERNS THAT YOU FEAR IS GOING TO HAPPEN DON'T ACTUALLY MATERIALIZE. AND I GET THAT. I GET I GET YOU'RE AFRAID OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN. I DON'T THINK A GAS STATION HERE IS GOING TO RUIN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT I ALSO DON'T THINK IT'S IT'S QUITE THE RIGHT FIT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WAY THE ROADS ENDED UP.

SO I'M GOING TO BE ENOUGH. CHAIR WHITELOCK WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FROM ONLINE. THANK YOU.

AS EVERYONE HAS SAID, IT IS A HARD DECISION. THESE ARE NOT EASY DECISIONS FOR ME. ANOTHER THING BESIDES WHAT HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP IS. ACTUALLY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT LOSING A CATHOLIC CHURCH IN OUR CITY AND, AND, AND THEY'RE GOING TO SELL THIS PARCEL AND, AND THEY'VE TOLD US THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD TO THE SOUTH. AND WE DO HAVE A CATHOLIC CHURCH IN OUR CITY, AND I'M WORRIED ABOUT LOSING THAT. SO THAT ALSO IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE WONDERED THINKING ABOUT THIS. AND I KNOW THE BIG HOME BUILDERS AREN'T LOOKING AT THIS PARCEL AND EDGE HOMES. I READ THAT LETTER. THANK YOU FOR GETTING THAT FOR US, MR. COSMO. BUT I ALSO KNOW THAT THERE ARE SMALL HOME BUILDERS. NOT A LOT OF THEM ANYMORE, BUT THERE STILL ARE SOME. AND AND PERHAPS THE CHURCH COULD LOOK AT HELPING WITH THE HOUSING CRISIS THAT I HEAR DEVELOPERS TELL ME ABOUT ALL THE TIME. PERHAPS THE CHURCH COULD HELP OUT WITH THAT, AND COULD GO AFTER A SMALLER HOME BUILDER THAT MIGHT BUILD SOME HOMES THAT WERE ON SMALLER LOTS, AND SMALLER HOMES THAT COULD PERHAPS BE A LITTLE MORE AFFORDABLE FOR SOME FAMILIES. AND AND MAYBE THERE CAN BE SOME DEED RESTRICTIONS OR SOME CREATIVE STUFF THAT THAT HELPS THOSE HOMES GO IN. THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE STATE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR ARE WORKING ON. PERHAPS WE COULD PARTNER ON THIS PARCEL TO PUT IN MORE FAMILIES AND GIVE THEM AN AFFORDABLE OPTION. I I'M NOT READY TO SAY THAT COMMERCIAL, JUST GIVING THEM AN SC1 AND MAYBE THEY'LL PUT IN WHAT I'VE

[02:00:07]

SEEN. YOU KNOW, THEY COULD HAVE COME. MANY PEOPLE COME WITH THE ZONING CHANGE, PLUS THEY COME WITH A MASTER DEVELOPMENT OF SOME SORT. I UNDERSTAND THIS IS A REALLY SMALL PARCEL FOR THAT, BUT AN AGREEMENT COULD HAVE COME TO SHOW US AND LOCK THEM INTO WHAT WOULD GO THERE. BUT WHAT I'M BEING ASKED TO DO IS GIVE THEM AN OPEN ENDED ANYTHING FOR AN SC1. AND I'M NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. AND THE NEIGHBORS AREN'T COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE COUNCIL THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS? ALL RIGHT THEN, IF WE HAVE NO MORE QUESTIONS, THEN WE'LL OPEN THIS UP FOR A MOTION. SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION. I DON'T THINK CONTINUING THIS OR MOVING THIS IS GOING TO MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. SO I'D LIKE TO HAVE A VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT, YES OR NO, AND GO FORWARD WITH IT, RATHER THAN TRYING TO PUSH IT DOWN THE STREET AND MAKE A DECISION A MONTH OR TWO FROM NOW. SO I THINK THE COUNCIL HAS MADE THEIR WELL, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR DECISIONS ARE, BUT I THINK THE COUNCIL HAS TALKED TONIGHT. SO I MOVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 562. A PETITION FROM WAGSTAFFE INVESTMENTS, BRANT NEALE, TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FOR 3.73 ACRES TO NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL AND REGIONAL PROPERTY TO SC ONE ZONE FOR DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT 99,047 SOUTH COPPER DUST LANE. I WILL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER LAM AND SECONDED FROM MYSELF ANY DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE. YEAH. JUST QUICKLY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, THANK YOU. THIS IS NOT AN EASY DECISION, AND I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE RESIDENTS WHO TOOK TIME TO SHARE THEIR CONCERNS. AND AND THOSE CONCERNS ARE VALID. AND I DON'T WANT HOWEVER, TONIGHT'S VOTE GOES TO BE INTERPRETED AS MINIMIZING THEM. AND MY DECISION IS BASED ON THE LAND USE QUESTION BEFORE US. AND I AM PERSUADED THAT IT IS SUITED BETTER TO ABSORB NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY THAN ANY ADDITIONAL HOMES IN THIS LOCATION. AND WHILE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DOES INTRODUCE ITS OWN IMPACTS, THOSE IMPACTS CAN BE ADDRESSED THROUGH DESIGN STANDARDS, BUFFERING, LIGHTING CONTROLS, TRAFFIC MITIGATION. YOU KNOW, WHATEVER APPLICATIONS COME FORWARD. I DO HOPE AND EXPECT THAT THOSE PROCESSES TO BE MEANINGFULLY, BE MEANINGFULLY ADDRESSED. THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S COMPATIBILITY. AND SO MY VOTE TONIGHT IS GOING TO REFLECT THE JUDGMENT ABOUT THE MOST APPROPRIATE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS DIFFICULT PARCEL, GIVEN ITS LOCATION AND CONSTRAINTS. AGAIN, IT DOES NOT DIMINISH THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED OVERSIGHT AS THIS PROPERTY MOVES THROUGH THE NEXT STAGES OF REVIEW. I WILL ALSO SAY THAT WITH THIS VOTE, AGAIN ECHOING EVERYONE ELSE, THAT IT IS HARD A A YES VOTE OBVIOUSLY PUTS THIS AT AN SC ONE ZONE AND A NO VOTE KEEPS IT AT SOMETHING WE ALL AGREE IS NOT WHAT WE WANT THIS SITE TO BE. SO IT WOULD PROBABLY COME TO SOMETHING REZONING AGAIN LATER. SO THESE ARE SOME THINGS WE'RE HAVING TO WEIGH AS WE PUT IN THIS VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON, TONIGHT, A NO VOTE SIMPLY ASKS THE LANDOWNER AND THE DEVELOPER TO BECOME MORE CREATIVE AND LOOK FOR WAYS THAT THEY CAN DO SOMETHING THAT WILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY, RATHER THAN JUST THE POCKETBOOK. I THINK WHAT COUNCILMEMBER WHITELOCK BROUGHT UP ABOUT INTRODUCING MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THAT LOCATION IS A PHENOMENAL IDEA. OTHER THINGS THAT I MENTIONED WOULD TAKE MORE CREATIVITY, WOULD PROBABLY RESULT IN LESS PROFITS. AND IT'S NOT GOING TO IT WOULDN'T BE AS EASY FOR SURE, BUT. I THINK THAT IF, YOU KNOW, A NO VOTE IS GOING TO BE IS NOT A YES VOTE FOR R 110. A NO VOTE IS SIMPLY SAYING THAT COMMERCIAL IS NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR THIS LOCATION, WHICH IT IS NOT. ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. SEEING NONE, I WILL SAY, MISS QUICK, WE ARE READY TO GET THIS VOTE ON CHAIR WHITELOCK. NO.

COUNCILMEMBER GREEN WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A SECOND. YES. COUNCILMEMBER SHELTON. NO.

ACTING CHAIR. BADOR. NO. COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. NO. COUNCIL MEMBER. BLOOM. YES.

[02:05:10]

COUNCIL MEMBER. LAMB. YES. OKAY, I SHOW THE MOTION FAILS. 3 TO 4. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL

[b. Ordinance No. 25-48 Adopting the West Jordan City Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP), Impact Fee Analysis (IFA), and Impact Fees for Transportation]