[CALL TO ORDER]
          [00:00:05]
          OKAY. I WILL CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. THIS IS THE FAIRWAY ESTATE SPECIAL SERVICES RECREATION DISTRICT MEETING TAKING PLACE ON MAY 5TH, 2026. IT IS 7:01 P.M. WE HAVE COUNCIL MEMBERS LAMB, JACOB, SHELTON, HARRIS AND WIGNALL, AND CHAIR BOB ADORE IS ON THE PHONE. IS HE IS. WE CONFIRMED THAT HE IS ON THE PHONE. THANK YOU. SO THIS MEETING BOARD MEMBERS. OH I MESSED UP AGAIN. NOT YOUR FAULT FOR BOARD MEMBERS. NO THAT'S FINE. OKAY. WE WILL MOVE INTO PUBLIC COMMENT. AND IF THERE IS ANYONE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ANY TOPIC. THE COUNCIL TYPICALLY DOESN'T ENGAGE IN ANY BACK AND FORTH, BUT MAY ADDRESS COMMENTS AFTER THE FACT. IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY, WE WILL MOVE ON TO BUSINESS ITEMS. OUR FIRST ITEM IS THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. JUST TO CLARIFY. THANK YOU. OKAY. OUR ITEM A IS TO ACCEPT 
          [a.
 Accept the Proposed Budget for the Fairway Estates Special Recreation District for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2027]
THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE FAIRWAY ESTATES SPECIAL RECREATION DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30TH, 2027. TONIGHT'S ACTION IS SIMPLY A FORMAL RECEIPT OF THE FILING FOR THE MAYOR'S PROPOSED BUDGET. THIS IS THE START OF THE PROCESS, AND AGAIN, WE HAVE SEVERAL WORK SESSIONS SCHEDULED FOR DISCUSSION. AND WE HAVE BECKY CONDIE HERE TO PRESENT. 
          THANK YOU. SO BOARD, IT'S GOOD TO BE HERE WITH YOU TONIGHT. AS HOPEFULLY YOU'RE AWARE. BUT TO INFORM THE INFORM THE RESIDENTS AND THE PUBLIC, THE FAIRWAY ESTATES SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT IS A SEPARATE TAXING ENTITY FROM THE CITY. IT WAS CREATED TO PROVIDE PARK AND OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING SERVICES TO THE HOMES AND PROPERTIES IN THAT DISTRICT. IT'S SIMILAR. 
          THOSE SERVICES ARE SIMILAR TO AN HOA, BUT INSTEAD OF PAYING AN HOA FEE, THEY FUND THIS SERVICES THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY TAX BILL ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. AND THUS WE GET TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS OF PRESENTING A BUDGET AND GOING THROUGH THE THE STEPS AS REQUIRED. HERE'S SOME BACKGROUND JUST TO REFRESH EVERYONE'S MEMORY. BACK IN 2023, WE WERE PREPARING BUDGET AND LOOKING FORWARD THROUGH OUR FIVE YEAR PLANS AND DETERMINED THAT THE FUND BALANCE WOULD NOT BE SUSTAINABLE FOR THAT FORESEEABLE FUTURE WITHOUT AN INCREASE IN THE PROPERTY TAX RATE. WE MET WITH THE RESIDENTS COUNCIL. THE BOARD MEMBERS REACHED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, HAD A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT MEETINGS, AND EVEN SENT OUT A SURVEY. THEY INDICATED THAT THEIR PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO START THOSE PROPERTY TAX INCREASES IN FISCAL YEAR 2025, AND SO WE HAVE DONE THAT FOR THE LAST TWO BUDGET YEARS, A 10% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE, AND THOSE WERE EQUIVALENT TO ABOUT $2 PER MONTH FOR EACH OF THOSE THOSE YEARS. SO GOING FORWARD, IN THIS 2027 BUDGET, A 10% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE IS ALSO AGAIN PROPOSED TO HELP FUND THOSE SERVICES AND MAINTAIN THAT RESERVE BALANCE. YOU CAN SEE HERE THE 2026 ESTIMATED COLUMN SHOWS THAT WE ANTICIPATE ENDING THE YEAR WITH A RESERVE BALANCE OF $30,000, AND EVEN WITH THE 10% TAX INCREASE, WE ARE DRAWING THAT DOWN BY ABOUT $5,000. TO END ANTICIPATE ENDING FISCAL YEAR 27 AT ABOUT $25,000. OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, WITH A CONTINUED 10% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. WE WOULD THEN NEED A SLIGHTLY HIGHER TAX INCREASE IN THOSE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. BUT WE'RE GOING TO WATCH THIS CLOSELY OVER, OVER TIME TO SEE HOW UTILITY COSTS INCREASE, HOW THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACT INCREASES AS WELL. THIS FIVE YEAR PLAN IS BASED ON A 5% INFLATION FACTOR FOR UTILITIES. SO WATER AND ELECTRICITY TO RUN THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, THAT SORT OF THING, AS WELL AS A 3% INCREASE ON THE CONTRACT WITH OUR LANDSCAPE PROVIDER. THE IMPACT TO AN AVERAGE HOME OR AN AVERAGE PROPERTY, LIKE I SAID, WOULD ONLY BE ABOUT $2 PER MONTH. OVERALL, THE 10% INCREASE WOULD BE $24 ON OUR PROPERTY TAX BILL FOR THE WHOLE YEAR. WE WILL KNOW CERTIFIED RATES MID JUNE. SO THESE NUMBERS THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT ARE BASED ON OUR BEST ESTIMATES OF BOTH THE ASSESSED VALUE, AS WELL AS WHAT THAT TAXABLE VALUE DISCOUNT WOULD BE FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. YOU CAN 
          [00:05:04]
SEE HERE THE BLUE LINE WOULD BE OUR TAX INCREASE OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS AT 10% AND THEN JUMPING TO JUST OVER 12. AND EVEN WITH THAT, OUR FUND BALANCE IS DROPPING DOWN. SO WE LIKE I SAID, WE'LL BE WATCHING THAT OVER TIME. BUT THE RESIDENTS IN THIS AREA ARE AWARE THAT THAT WAS THE PLAN GOING INTO THIS THIS TIME PERIOD. AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO INFORM THE RESIDENTS THERE OF WHAT WE SEE HAPPENING AND WHAT THEY CAN ANTICIPATE. SO WHEN INTERESTING ASPECT OF THE FAIRWAY ESTATES IS THAT BECAUSE THEY'RE SUCH A SMALL ENTITY WITH REVENUE LESS THAN $20,000, THEY ARE EXEMPT FROM THE TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARINGS. SO IT'S GOING TO BE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE DO ON THE CITY BASIS. WE INTEND TO STILL ANNOUNCE THE TAX INCREASE, AND WE WILL STILL HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR FROM THE RESIDENTS. SO TONIGHT, AS YOU RECEIVE THIS PROPOSED BUDGET, WE WILL. OUR NEXT ITEM, WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT INTENT TO EXCEED THE PROPERTY TAX RATE, ALTHOUGH THAT'S NOT REQUIRED BY THE NEW LEGISLATION, WE FELT IT WAS IN THE BEST INTEREST TO BE TRANSPARENT TO THOSE RESIDENTS AND PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION IN THE SAME FORMAT. MAY 12TH IS WHEN YOU WOULD THEN ACCEPT THE TENTATIVE BUDGET AND SET THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, WHICH WOULD BE THE FOLLOWING MEETING OF MAY 26TH. AND THEN IN JUNE, ADOPT THE PROPERTY TAX RATE. 
          ONCE WE HAVE THAT FINAL INFORMATION FROM THE THE COUNTY AND THEN ADOPT THE ANNUAL BUDGET AS WELL. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT? COUNCIL MEMBER HARRIS, I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION. IS THE NOTICE OF THE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE THAT IT'S MOVING TO THE 10%, OR THAT IT WOULD MOVE TO THE 12%, THE 10% JUST FOR JUST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027? ARE THE RESIDENTS PAYING THIS AWARE OF THE BUMP TO THE 12% AT YEAR? WHATEVER IT WAS, IT HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FIVE YEAR PLAN IN THE BUDGET. IT HASN'T BEEN COMMUNICATED SPECIFICALLY IN THAT FORMAT TO THE RESIDENTS. JUST BECAUSE WE ARE LOOKING AT IT ONE YEAR AT A TIME. GOT IT. 
          THANKS. DIRECTOR ANDERSON. YEAH. IF I COULD HELP JUST FOR YOU AND COUNCIL MEMBER HARRIS. A FEW YEARS AGO, THE CITY COUNCIL HELD A PUBLIC MEETING OUT AT FAIRWAY ESTATES. IT'S 53 PROPERTIES OUT BY THE GOLF COURSE. OUT NEAR WHERE CHAIR BADER LIVES. THE COUNCIL WENT OUT THERE AND MET DIFFERENT PROPOSALS. THEY WERE GIVEN THREE DIFFERENT OPTIONS OF HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO TRY AND CORRECT THE FUND BALANCE DISCREPANCY, AND THEY WE WE SURVEYED THEM. WE TOOK BALLOTS FROM THEM. THEY VOTED ON WHICH ONE WAS PREFERRED. AND SO WE'RE FOLLOWING WHAT THEY HAD ASKED FOR, WHICH IS A FIVE YEAR PLAN, I BELIEVE. AND SO WE'RE IN THE WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT, IF THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU. BECKY, OF COURSE. YES. AND I'D LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION FOR RESOLUTION. OH, SORRY, THIS IS NOT A RESOLUTION, I APOLOGIZE. 
          OKAY. I MOVE TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE FAIRWAY ESTATE SPECIAL SERVICE RECREATION DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30TH, 2027. COUNCIL MEMBER LAMB, SECOND. 
          AND WITH THAT, WE. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION TO THE MOTION? IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION. 
          MISS QUICK, CAN WE HAVE A VOTE, PLEASE? ACTING CHAIR. WAGNER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. LAMB. YES. 
          COUNCIL MEMBER. HARRIS. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. JACOB. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. 
          CHAIR. YES. THANK YOU. THAT MOTION PASSES 6 TO 0. OKAY. WE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM, 
          [b.
 FESSRD Resolution No. 024 Acknowledging the Statement of Intent to Increase Property Tax in the Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and the Property Tax Impact Schedule]
WHICH IS THE FESSRD RESOLUTION NUMBER 0.024. ACKNOWLEDGING THE STATEMENT OF INTENT TO INCREASE PROPERTY TAX IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2027 BUDGET AND THE PROPERTY TAX IMPACT SCHEDULE, WE HAVE A BUDGET ANALYST, BECKY CONDIE, HERE WITH US. AGAIN, AS WE JUST DISCUSSED IN THE BUDGET, THE RECENT CHANGES TO STATE CODE REQUIRE A STATEMENT BE MADE IN PUBLIC MEETINGS AT WHICH A BUDGET THAT INCLUDES A TAX INCREASE IS PRESENTED. BECAUSE THE FAIRWAY ESTATES DISTRICT IS 
          [00:10:05]
UNDER THAT THRESHOLD, IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO DO THIS, BUT WE ARE CHOOSING TO MAKE THIS STATEMENT FOR GREATER TRANSPARENCY FOR THOSE LISTENING ONLINE OR WHO WILL BE IMPACTED BY THIS. THAT SAID, GIVEN THAT THE DISTRICT IS CONSIDERING A TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 THAT IS EXPECTED TO EXCEED THE CERTIFIED TAX RATE, THE PROPOSED BUDGET INCLUDES A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. THE DISTRICT IS NOT REQUIRED TO HOLD A TRUTH AND TAXATION HEARING IN AUGUST, BUT THE PUBLIC WILL STILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THE BUDGET. AS WE DISCUSSED, THAT PUBLIC HEARING IS SET TO BE SCHEDULED FOR MAY 26TH OF THIS YEAR. THIS IS THE INFORMATION IN THE PROPERTY TAX IMPACT SCHEDULE. IT SHOWS THE PROPOSED REVENUE THAT WOULD BE BROUGHT IN BY THAT TAX CHANGE, WHICH IS $13,487 COMPARED TO THE CURRENT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE OF 12,261. SO AN ADDITIONAL INCREASE IN REVENUE TO THE DISTRICT OF $1,226, THAT IS A 10% INCREASE BASED ON THE PREVIOUS YEAR'S REVENUE, WHICH EQUATES TO ABOUT $24 TO AN AVERAGE PROPERTY HOLDER, AND THAT WOULD BE THE ANNUAL AMOUNT. THE IMPACT THAT THAT WOULD HAVE ON THE DISTRICT. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE IS ACCEPTED, OR IF YOU CONTINUED WITH THAT PROPOSED TAX INCREASE, THE THE EXPENDITURES IN THE BUDGET ARE NOT GOING TO CHANGE. WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIFIC ONE ITEM TIED TO THAT BUDGET BUDGETED TAX INCREASE. IT IS SOLELY TO KEEP PACE WITH INFLATION AND MAINTAIN THE RESERVE BALANCES. SO IF THE INCREASE IS NOT APPROVED, THE DISTRICT WILL CONTINUE TO USE THOSE FUND BALANCES AND JUST DRAW THOSE DOWN QUICKER, WHICH WOULD ULTIMATELY MEAN A STEEPER TAX INCREASE IN THE FUTURE. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS? THE PUBLIC WILL, LIKE WE SAID, HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE COMMENT IF THEY CHOOSE TO COME AND AND OFFER THEIR INSIGHTS OR EVEN ONLINE, THAT THEY WILL HAVE THAT OPTION AS WELL ON THAT PUBLIC HEARING DATE. COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB, THANK YOU. THE UTILITIES AND OTHER LINE ON THEIR BUDGET, THAT'S BASICALLY WATER, RIGHT? IT IS WATER. IT IS A SMALL AMOUNT FOR ELECTRICITY JUST TO RUN THE ELECTRICITY SYSTEM. AND THERE'S ALSO A $25 REGISTRATION FEE TO REMAIN AN ENTITY REGISTERED WITH THE STATE. THIS IS ADMITTEDLY A LITTLE BIT SNARKY, SO PLEASE BE WELL TOLERANT. WHERE DOES THE DISTRICT BUY THEIR WATER FROM? DO THEY BUY IT FROM THE CITY? THEY ARE PART OF THE CITY'S WATER SYSTEM, SO THEY PAY THE CITY TO CITY WATER THAT ARE NOT PROPOSED TO INCREASE OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. FAIRWAY ESTATES ISN'T GETTING ANY BIGGER YET. THEIR WATER RATE IS. THEIR WATER EXPENSE IS PROJECTED TO GO UP EVERY YEAR FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS, GUYS. SO, OKAY, JUST JUST. 
          JUST SCRATCHING MY CHIN, JUST SCRATCHING MY CHIN A LITTLE BIT. THE OTHER THING I JUST WANTED TO MENTION JUST FOR BACKGROUND IS THIS IS A GREAT FAIRWAY ESTATES IS A GREAT MICROCOSM OF WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DON'T ADJUST PROPERTY TAXES FOR A LONG TIME. FOR A LONG TIME, THE PROPERTY TAXES WE COLLECTED THERE WERE WAY MORE THAN THEY NEEDED. THE FUND BALANCE WAS GOING WAY UP, WAS GETTING OVERINFLATED. YOU COULD NEVER DO THIS IN A GENERAL FUND BECAUSE OF THE STATE RESTRICTION, BUT WE SAW THAT HAPPENING OR WE SAW IT. WE SAW THAT HAPPEN. WE STOPPED, YOU KNOW, WITH THEIR PROPERTY TAX INCREASE, WE KIND OF WE KIND OF FROZE THEIR PROPERTY TAX RATES. AND IT STARTED TO THE POINT WHERE WE SAW COMING UP IN FUTURE YEARS, THEY WERE GOING TO RUN OUT OF MONEY BECAUSE THEIR THEIR PROPERTY TAX REVENUE WAS STAYING EXACTLY THE SAME. BUT WATER WAS GOING UP. I'LL JUST LEAVE THAT. AND UTILITY RATES WERE GOING UP AND LANDSCAPING RATES WERE GOING UP AND ALL THESE OTHER THINGS. YET THEY WERE COLLECTING THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT FOR YEARS AND YEARS, WHICH FOR A LONG TIME WAS MORE THAN ENOUGH. BUT BECAUSE THOSE RATES GO UP AND THE COLLECTION WAS THE SAME, WE NOW WERE DIPPING INTO RESERVES OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DON'T KEEP PACE WITH PRICE INCREASES, WITH YOUR REVENUES. SO WHICH IS WHY WHEN I STARTED TALKING ABOUT WATER RATES, WHEN I START TALKING ABOUT PROPERTY TAX INCREASES, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I LOVE RAISING MONEY AND GROWING GOVERNMENT, AS PEOPLE HAVE ACCUSED ME OF IN 
          [00:15:04]
THE PAST. AND BECAUSE OF, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER, I REALLY DON'T LIKE PUTTING US IN A HOLE THAT THEN IT'S A LITTLE BIT PAINFUL. AND WE DO 10% INCREASES EVERY YEAR FOR FIVE YEARS TO GET OUT OF 10% INCREASES EVERY YEAR IS A LOT. I LIKE 2% INCREASES EVERY YEAR, 3% INCREASES EVERY YEAR. IT'S A BETTER WAY OF DOING THINGS. AND THAT GOES FOR RATES, TAXES, ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT DETERMINE REVENUES. SALES TAXES IS THE ONLY THING THAT CHANGES WITH INFLATION. 
          EVERYTHING ELSE, YOU'VE GOT TO CHANGE IT. COUNCIL MEMBER SHELTON, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE RESERVES. WE'RE USING THOSE RIGHT NOW TO MINIMIZE THE INCREASES. RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. SO THOSE THOSE RESERVES ARE SLOWLY GETTING SMALLER AND SMALLER EACH YEAR. 
          ARE WE GOING TO CONTINUE. IS THE IDEA TO CONTINUE TAX INCREASES AFTER THINGS HAVE BALANCED SO THAT WE CAN BUILD UP THE RESERVES AGAIN AFTER THIS PERIOD? IT DEPENDS ON WHAT WE SEE HAPPENING OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS WITH THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACT AND THE SERVICE THAT'S ACTUALLY PROVIDED THERE. IF IF FOR SOME REASON THE THE DISTRICT DECIDES TO MAYBE ZEROSCAPE SOME OF THAT AREA OR DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT WOULD THEN ADJUST WHAT IS REQUIRED TO PAY OUT, RIGHT? THAT BUT YES, THAT FUND BALANCE IDEALLY, I MEAN, IT CAN'T GO TOO LOW OR IT WON'T BE SUSTAINABLE TO EVEN TO OPERATE AND FUNCTION. BUT AT SOME POINT, HOPEFULLY THAT THOSE, THOSE LINES WILL THEN INTERSECT SO THAT IT'S MAINTAINING ITSELF. 
          BUT LIKE BOARD MEMBER JACOBS SAID, THOSE SMALL INCREASES IS WHAT'S GOING TO HELP KEEP PACE WITH ALL OF THE COSTS THAT ARE COMING. WHAT IS THE GOAL ON THE RESERVE BALANCE? DO WE WANT TO HAVE LIKE A FULL YEAR OF OPERATING EXPENSES IN THAT IN THAT RESERVE? WHAT'S THE GOAL? THE GOAL LEVEL, RIGHT IN THE IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE CITY, WE ARE MANDATED BY STATE CODE TO HAVE A CERTAIN PERCENT, RIGHT. THAT'S NOT THE CASE WITH THIS SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT. 
          AND I WANT TO SAY NO MORE THAN ONE YEAR OF RESERVES. ONE YEAR IS PROBABLY SUFFICIENT. SIX MONTHS OF OPERATING REVENUE IS PROBABLY THE MORE IDEAL LEVEL. BUT LET ME JUST SAY, IT'S REALLY IT'S UP TO YOU. IT'S UP TO YOU AS THE BOARD FOR FOR US TO DECIDE WHAT THE APPROPRIATE RESERVE LEVEL IS. AS STAFF, WE'D PROBABLY RECOMMEND SOMEWHERE BETWEEN SIX MONTHS TO NINE MONTHS WORTH OF RESERVES. WE WERE UP TO A, YOU KNOW, TWO YEARS WORTH OF RESERVES THAT WAS TOO HIGH. THAT'S WHY IT'S PULLING DOWN. BUT YOU SEE IT, YOU SEE THOSE PROJECTIONS DOWN A LITTLE ON THE LOW SIDE FOR MY. EXCEPT THAT LET ME. BUT IT'S PRETTY STABLE. IT'S A IT'S A SMALL AMOUNT AND IT'S A STABLE. THE ONLY INFRASTRUCTURE STABLE EXPENSE IS THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 
          SO IN ESSENCE, YOU'RE PAYING FOR THE GRASS TO BE MOWED AND LIGHTING. BUT THE ONLY MAINTENANCE ITEM THAT WOULD REALLY LIKE TAKE OUT A RESERVES OR THAT YOU WOULD WANT A RESERVE LEVEL FOR IT WOULD BE TO REPLACE A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. SO OR RELANDSCAPE OR SOMETHING, RIGHT? IF THE DISTRICT SAYS, HEY, I REALLY WANT A PLAYGROUND PUT INTO THIS PARK AND IT'S A, A LARGER LEVEL OF SERVICE THAN WHAT WE WOULD PROVIDE OTHERWISE, OR WE DECIDE THAT THAT WOULD BE A DISTRICT EXPENSE, THAT WOULD BE WHERE THEY WANT TO PUT RESERVES, RIGHT? SO IT'S REALLY AN UNUSUAL DISTRICT BECAUSE THE ONLY THING IS REALLY SPRINKLERS. SO. DID THAT ANSWER ENOUGH? THANK YOU. OKAY. THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION. I'LL ASK FOR A MOTION. COUNCIL MEMBER LAM, I MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 024. ACKNOWLEDGING THE BUDGET OFFICER STATED THE PROPOSED BUDGET INCLUDES A PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX INCREASE AND PRESENTED THE PROPERTY TAX IMPACT SCHEDULE. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. AND IF THERE IS NO MORE DISCUSSION. MISS QUICK, CAN WE HAVE A VOTE, PLEASE? BOARD MEMBER HARRIS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. LAMB. YES. BOARD MEMBER. 
          JACOB. YES. ACTING CHAIR. WIGNALL. YES. CHAIR. BADOR. YES. BOARD MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. 
          THANK YOU, I SHALL THE MOTION PASSES 6 TO 0. OKAY. WE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR FINAL ITEM, 
          [CONSENT ITEMS]
WHICH IS THE APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2025. FAIRWAY ESTATES SPECIAL SERVICE RECREATION DISTRICT MEETING MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. SECOND. IS 
          [00:20:09]
THERE ANY SECOND TO THE MOTION? I'M SORRY. DISCUSSION. OKAY. OKAY. NO. OKAY. AND DIRECTOR ANDERSON, I APOLOGIZE. WE'RE NOT DOING A ROLL CALL VOTE OR WE ARE. YOU YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE OTHER THAN YOU HAVE A REMOTE MEMBER. AND IF ANYONE VOTES NO, THEN YOU HAVE TO DO A ROLL CALL. SO THE MY ADVICE IS JUST DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. IT'S A LITTLE SAFER JUST IN CASE SOMEONE. I DON'T EXPECT ANYONE TO VOTE NO, BUT OKAY. AND DOES MISS QUICK DO THE ROLL CALL VOTE. OKAY, OKAY WITH THAT, MISS QUICK, CAN WE PLEASE GET A VOTE? CHAIR BRADOR. 
          YES. BOARD MEMBER. JACOB. YES. BOARD MEMBER. HARRIS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. LAMB. YES. ACTING CHAIR. YES. BOARD MEMBER. SHELTON. YES. THANK YOU. I SHOW THE MOTION PASSES 6 TO 0.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.