[a. Immaculate; 1390 West 9000 South; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (Motor Vehicle Sales and Service, Used); SC-2 (Commercial Shopping Center) Zone;)[Tayler Jensen #35604 Parcel #27-03-278-026-0000]]

NOTHING. NEXT IS PUBLIC HEARINGS WITH FINAL ACTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND FIRST OFF IS ITEM A IMMACULATE 1390 WEST 9000 SOUTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A CUP MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE AND AN S TWO ZONE. AND IF WE HAVE THE APPLICANT LIKE TO COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND, PLEASE. YEAH. THIS IS MY NAME IS MIKE CLARK AND I'M WITH IMMACULATE. AND JUST LIKE YOU SAID, WE'RE ASKING TO GET A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND THE OLD OR THE SOON TO BE OLD BIG FIVE BUILDING. SO RIGHT NOW THE CURRENT ZONING IS SC ONE. WE GOT THAT CHANGED TO SC TWO, AND WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE AND UPGRADE THE BUILDING WITH SOME PAINT AND ADD SOME DOORS AND TURN IT INTO A NICE FACILITY. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. IF WE DO, WE'LL CALL YOU UP LATER. THANK YOU. THANKS, TAYLOR. THANK YOU. CHAIR AND COUNCIL COMMISSION, JUST AN OVERVIEW ON THE SITE. IT DOES MEET ALL THE PROPOSED ALL THE STANDARDS OF THE ZONE. THAT INCLUDES LANDSCAPING AND PARKING. THE BUILDING IS EXISTING. THEY'RE JUST RETROFITTING IT FOR THIS USE. IF APPROVED TONIGHT, THE NEXT STEPS WILL BE A BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY OF THOSE TENANT IMPROVEMENTS. THAT'S A STAFF LEVEL APPROVAL AS WELL AS A BUSINESS LICENSE. WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANKS, TAYLOR. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, YOU'LL BE GIVEN THREE MINUTES. JUST COME UP TO THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME. IF YOU'RE ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND FROM THE PHONE. STAR NINE. OKAY, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR COMMENTS AND OR MOTIONS. COMMISSIONER ALLEN. I KNOW YOU HIT THE BUTTON. I GUESS I WILL YELL IT THINKS I'M GREEN WAITING. IT'S ALL RIGHT. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT A LOT OF THESE CASES, THE STAFF REPORT DOES A FANTASTIC JOB OF APPRIZING US. THAT'S WHY THERE'S NOT A LOT OF QUESTIONS OR ANY QUESTIONS IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE. I AGREE WITH THE STAFF REPORT. I DIDN'T SEE ANY CONDITIONS THAT NEEDED TO BE. WORKED AROUND ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE. AND SO I WOULD MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE FOR IMMACULATE, USED FOR IMMACULATE ON APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES AT 1390 WEST 9000 SOUTH, SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF APPROVAL.

COMMISSIONER ROBERTS, I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. THAT CARRIES SIX. NOTHING. NEXT IS ITEM B COMPLETE MACHINE AT

[b. Complete Machine; 4343 West 7800 South; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (Outside Storage); M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone;[Tayler Jensen #35624 Parcel 21-31-201-012-0000] ]

[00:05:03]

4343 WEST 7800 SOUTH WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP OUTSIDE STORAGE AND AN M ONE ZONE LIGHT MANUFACTURING. AND IF YOU'RE HERE TO STATE YOUR NAME, I'M JEFF SLADE. THIS IS MY WIFE, DONNA. WE'VE BEEN OUT THERE SINCE 97. WE BUILT THE BUILDING OUT THERE, AND RECENTLY WE'VE BEEN ASKED TO GET A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO STORE THE THINGS THAT WE'VE HAD ON THERE FOR SOME OF THEM OVER A DECADE, SO WE CAN GET OUR LICENSE. SO WE'VE COME TO GET THIS USE PERMIT APPROVED. WE'RE GOING TO PUT IN SOME SOLID FENCING AS REQUIRED, AND AROUND THE PERIMETER ON THE EAST SIDE, IT'S REQUIRED TO BE SOLID BECAUSE THERE'S A ROADWAY AND A CORNER, AND THEN THE BACK WE SHARE WITH STANDARD SUPPLY IS GOING TO BE BUILT THE SAME AS THE SIX FOOT EXISTING FENCE WITH THE SLATS PUT PUT INTO THE CHAIN LINK. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. IF WE HAVE ANY WE'LL CALL YOU UP LATER. THANK YOU. OKAY. TAYLOR. THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSION. I THINK JEFF DID A PRETTY GOOD JOB OF EXPLAINING WHAT THEY'RE DOING. THERE IS AN EXISTING FENCE OUT THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS NOT A PRIVACY FENCE. SO THIS WILL BE THE ONE THAT WILL HAVE THE BLUE METAL ATTACHED TO IT TO MEET THAT OUTDOOR STORAGE REQUIREMENT. THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS, THERE ARE THREE. THE FIRST IS THAT THE MASONRY OR STEEL FENCE REQUIRE. ON THE EAST SIDE, THEY'RE PROPOSING THAT BLUE FENCE. SECOND IS A SIX FOOT PRIVACY FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES, WHICH THEY'RE SHOWING WITH THAT, A CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH THE TAN SLATS. AND THEN THE THIRD CONDITION IS JUST ANY PORTION OF THE OUTDOOR STORAGE YARD BEING USED FOR PARKING OR STORAGE OF VEHICLES TO BE PAVED. AND THEY'RE SHOWING THAT IN THEIR SITE PLAN AS WELL. SO WITH THAT, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION ON THE RECOMMENDATION ON THE BOARD. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS ALSO HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING.

SO IF YOU'RE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, YOU'LL BE GIVEN THREE MINUTES. JUST COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME. IF YOU'RE ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND PHONE STAR NINE. THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. OKAY, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THAT PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR COMMENTS AND OR RECOMMENDATIONS OR MOTIONS. COMMISSIONER ALLEN, MAYBE WE CAN CATCH IT THIS WAY. SAME SITUATION HERE. I THINK THE STAFF REPORT DID A GOOD JOB OF EXPLAINING THE SITUATION. THE PRE MEETING BROUGHT EVERYTHING OUT, MEETS THE THE INTENT OF THE CODE. SO I'D MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE. COMPLETE MACHINE LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 0.94 ACRES AT 4343 WEST 7800 SOUTH, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS APPROVAL. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ, I'LL SECOND THAT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? OKAY, THAT CARRIES SIX. NOTHING. NEXT IS ITEM C, THE ALUMINA AT 8399

[c. Lumina; 8399 South Dunlop Drive; Major Subdivision (12 Lots on approximately 2.70 Acres) Residential Single Family, 8,000 Square Foot Minimum Lots (R-1-8) Zone with the Infill Development Overlay (IDO-1) Zone [Tayler Jensen/Nate Nelson/Angelica Haro; #35382; parcel #21-33-378-011-0000]]

SOUTH DUNLOP DRIVE, A MAJOR SUBDIVISION 12 LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.7 ACRES.

RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 800 ZERO SQUARE FEET, BUT MINIMUM IN AN R ONE EIGHT. AND IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT, JUST STATE YOUR NAME. YES, I'M DAMIEN MORA WITH HOMES. I'M THE PROJECT LEADER ON THIS PROJECT. YEAH. ALUMINA AT 8399 SOUTH LOOP DRIVE. IT'S A TOUGH, TOUGH SITE. YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP IT'S A TRIANGULAR PIECE. IT HAS THE CANAL ON THE ONE SIDE, THE TRACKS LINE ON THE ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT, AND JUST THE SHAPE OF IT IS A MADE A PRETTY DIFFICULT IS MAKING IT PRETTY DIFFICULT TO DEVELOP. SO WE LAST YEAR WE, WE GOT THE INFILL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE APPROVED. THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY HELP THIS DEVELOPMENT GET DEVELOPED. AND JUST WANTED TO KIND OF SOME BACKGROUND ON, ON THAT. WHEN WE MET WITH STAFF IN OUR IN OUR INITIAL MEETINGS, WE WERE TOLD THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES

[00:10:08]

WOULD THE CITY APPROVE ANYTHING. A PROJECT WITH A RIGHT OF WAY LESS THAN 50, WHICH IS YOUR STANDARD RIGHT OF WAY. SO WE WE WITH THAT KNOWLEDGE AND OUR DESIRE TO DEVELOP IT AND WE, WE WENT WITH, WE, WE, WE DID THE INFILL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, WHICH HELPS US DESIGN AND PROPOSE THIS PROJECT AS SHOWN ABOVE, IT IS WE'RE SHOWING 12 DETACHED LOTS. WE WANTED TO FOCUS ON. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS. THIS PROPERTY IS YOU ACCESS IT THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE MOUNTAIN VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH IS ALL DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY. AND SO WE WANTED TO KEEP TRUE TO THAT, BUT WE NEEDED SOME HELP, SOME EXCEPTIONS, I SHOULDN'T SAY EXCEPTIONS. THE IDEAL. AND THIS IS WHAT. AND WE WERE ABLE TO IN OUR IN OUR WE HAD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING BEFORE WE WENT INTO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS IDO. AND WE ACTUALLY SHOWED 13 LOTS. THIS IS 12 LOTS. WE HAD TO ADDRESS STORM DRAIN. I THINK BETWEEN LOTS 11 AND 12.

WE HAD A STORM DETENTION AREA. AND SO WE ENDED DEVELOPMENT. WE ACTUALLY ENDED UP LOSING A LOT, BUT WE MADE IT WORK. AND THEN ACTUALLY THE, THE DETENTION ENDED UP BEING GOING UNDERGROUND. BUT THIS IS THIS IS WHAT WE CAME UP WITH. WE FEEL IT'S, IT CONTRIBUTES TO THE COMMUNITY, TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I JUST WANTED TO GET A LITTLE CREDIT FOR GOING WITH 12 VERSUS 13 THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP. BUT WE FEEL PRETTY GOOD ABOUT WHERE WE'RE AT ON THIS PROJECT, THE DEVELOPMENT PHASE, AND TRYING TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE I NEED TO ADDRESS. BUT I THINK I THINK THAT'S THAT'S IT. IT'S IT'S A TOUGH SITE. TRIANGULAR PIECE IS NOT AN EASY PIECE TO DEVELOP, BUT I, I, WHAT WE SHOW, I THINK IT MAKES A REALLY GOOD PROJECT. TAYLOR ANYTHING ELSE I SHOULD ADDRESS ON THIS PROJECT? ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I JUST KIND OF GOT ONE QUICK QUESTION ON YOUR LOT. 12 WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO PUT A HOME IN THAT LITTLE SPOT? AND I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS. AND THIS IS JUST FOR CURIOSITY'S SAKE, WHICH DIRECTION IS IT GOING TO BE FACING? THEY WILL ALL BE FACING TOWARDS THE ROAD. OKAY. YEAH, WE WE, WE HAVE TO GO TWO STORY ON THESE TWO STORY USUALLY HAS A SMALLER FOOTPRINT THAN A RAMBLER STYLE HOME. SO THAT SAVES ON SOME SQUARE FOOTAGE, SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT THE STAFF WERE IN. NOW I SHOULDN'T SAY INFLEXIBLE THAT THEY SAID THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE SAME THING, BUT IT IS IS ANY ANYTHING LESS THAN A 22 FOOT DRIVEWAY SETBACK? SO WE HAVE THE 50 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY. WE HAVE THE 22 FOOT. DRIVEWAY REQUIREMENT SETBACK AND. WE WE'RE MAKING IT WORK. WE'RE SHOWING WE HAVE A PRODUCT THAT WE FEEL WILL FIT THIS THESE LOTS AND THIS COMMUNITY. AND OF ALL OF THE LOTS, THAT'S KIND OF THE WEIRDEST LOOKING LOT I'VE SEEN. YEAH, YEAH, IT IS A LITTLE FUNKY. AND AGAIN, IT'S, IT'S BECAUSE OF THE TRIANGULAR SHAPE AND, AND BECAUSE OF THAT, WE, WE, WE WENT WITH THE IDEAL ONE THAT ALLOWED SOME FLEXIBILITY THERE FOR US TO DEVELOP THE SITE, WHICH WAS VERY NEEDED. OKAY. COMMISSIONER HOLLINGSWORTH, SO A QUESTION FOR YOU ON THE SOUTHERN POINT OF YOUR YOUR TRIANGLE HERE, I BELIEVE THERE'S A CELL TOWER OR SOMETHING IN THAT LOCATION. IS THAT TRUE? IF YOU LOOK AT THE JUST THE BOTTOM OF THE TRIANGLE, THE POINT THERE'S LIKE A LITTLE JOG. IT IS A ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO CALL IT. MAXIMUM POWER INFRASTRUCTURE. OKAY. I DON'T I DON'T BELIEVE IT'S A CELL TOWER. I MET WITH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER AND YEAH, THEY SAID IT'S THEIRS. THIS ISN'T THIS ISN'T GOING TO IMPEDE THEM HAVING ACCESS TO THEIR THEIR EQUIPMENT. NO, I THINK IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY ONLY IT'S A DEDICATED EQUIPMENT FOR,

[00:15:02]

FOR THE TRACKS. AND THERE IS A VERY MASSIVE FENCE. SO THAT LEFT SIDE, WHICH IS THE WEST SIDE IS, IS A CANAL, CANAL ROAD. AND I THINK UTA ONLY MADE MAYBE WEST JORDAN HAS ACCESS TO THAT.

THERE'S A THERE'S A GATE AND I THINK IT'S ONLY SERVICES THAT. SO I THINK IF THE UTA NEEDED ROCKY MOUNTAIN, THAT WOULD GIVE THEM ACCESS THAT WAY AND THEY HAVEN'T. THE WAY THERE WAS.

THERE'S NO ACCESS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE CURRENTLY. SO THEY'VE BEEN ACCESSING IT.

OKAY. YEAH, THAT WAS MY MY POINT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I SHOULD SAY THERE'S NO VEHICULAR ACCESS OTHER THAN THE TURNAROUND. SORRY. THERE'S A TURNAROUND CURRENTLY. BUT ANYWAY. ALL RIGHT. IF WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS WE'LL CALL YOU UP LATER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU TAYLOR. THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSION. JUST TO FOLLOW UP ON WHAT DAMIEN SAID, THIS IS DEFINITELY A VERY DIFFICULT SITE TO DEVELOP. IT'S PROBABLY WHY IT'S BEEN UNBUILT FOR SO LONG IS BECAUSE OF HOW DIFFICULT IT IS. HE MENTIONED THAT LAST YEAR THEY DID GET THE INFILL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ADDED. WITH THAT, THERE WAS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SOME OF THE PROVISIONS THAT WERE ALLOWED IN THAT ARE UP TO 13 DWELLING UNITS. THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH WAS REDUCED FROM 75FT DOWN TO 42. THAT MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS TEN FEET. MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKS GET REDUCED DOWN TO FIVE FEET FROM EIGHT, AND THEN MINIMUM DRIVEWAY IS 22FT.

IF THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO GET A 22 FOOT DRIVEWAY, THEY ARE ALLOWED A 22 BY NINE FOOT PARKING PAD ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE ON A SIDE, SO THOSE WERE INCLUDED IN THE IDO APPROVAL. THEY'RE CURRENTLY OUT COMPLIES WITH THOSE STANDARDS AND NEXT STEPS. IF IT GETS APPROVED TONIGHT WOULD BE FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, WHICH IS A STAFF LEVEL APPROVAL. SAME WITH GETTING THAT PLAT MYLAR DEDICATED AND RECORDED. AND THEN BUILDING PERMITS ARE ALSO A STAFF LEVEL APPROVAL. SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH JUST THE ONE RECOMMENDATION.

AND THAT'S KIND OF A STANDARD ONE WE HAVE FOR SUBDIVISIONS IS THEY JUST ADDRESS ALL RED LINES THAT COME UP DURING THE FINAL SUBDIVISION REVIEWS. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. TAYLOR. ALL RIGHT. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, COME UP TO THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME. YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. IF YOU'RE ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. OKAY. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP TO FOR COMMENTS AND OR MOTIONS. IF YOURS WORKS. I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE PRELIMINARY MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR IS IT LUMINA OR LUMINA? LUMINA, LOCATED AT 8399 SOUTH DUNLAP DRIVE, SUBJECT TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER GONZALES, I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. THAT CARRIES SIX. NOTHING. OKAY. NEXT IS THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

[a. City Code Text Amendment – Powers and Duties of Land Use Authorities and Appeal Authorities, including the Appeal Authority for Land Use Fees and a Definition for “Land Use Regulations Titles”; Amending Sections 2-3-3,13-2-3,15-2-3, 15-2-415-2-5,15-5-1, 15-5-2, 15-5-3,15-5-4 and 15-5-5.]

TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION. AND FIRST ON THIS IS FOR A WHICH IS THE CITY CODE TEXT AMENDMENT POWERS AND DUTIES OF LAND USE AUTHORITIES AND APPEAL AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING THE APPEAL AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE FEES AND A DEFINITION FOR LAND USE REGULATION TITLES. AMENDING SECTION 2-3-313-2-315-2-3, 15-2-4, 15-2-5, 15-5-1, 15-5-2, 15-5-3, 15-5-4 AND 155-5. I'M DONE FOR THE DAY, AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW, JAY, THAT AS I WAS PUTTING TOGETHER THIS POWERPOINT, I CONTEMPLATED LEAVING ALL THOSE NUMBERS OFF BECAUSE I KNEW YOU WOULD READ THEM. SO. SO YOU HAVE FORWARD THE SLIDE. AND SO THE APPEAL AUTHORITY NOW IN WEST JORDAN CITY USED TO BE A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. AND THE THE CITY COUNCIL, IN CERTAIN INSTANCES. BUT NOW IT'S OUR ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE WHO HAS BEEN ABOUT A

[00:20:01]

YEAR AND A HALF NOW DOING A FINE JOB, AND HE'S LAW TRAINED AND IS REALLY. MAKES CORRECT DECISIONS. AND SO WHAT THIS ORDINANCE WILL DO WILL BE CLARIFY AND REGULATE THE DUTIES OF THE LAND USE APPEAL AUTHORITY. IT CLARIFIES SOME OF THE DUTIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND IT CLARIFIES THE DUTIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL. AND THERE IS A STATEMENT IN THERE, AND ALSO THAT THE CITY WILL NOT ACCEPT AN APPLICATION UNTIL IT'S DEEMED COMPLETE. AND THAT PROTECTS US. IF WE ARE EVER TAKEN TO COURT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE AN APPLICATION SHOULD ALWAYS BE COMPLETE BEFORE IT COMES INTO THE CITY. AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT IT MEETS ALL ZONING. IT'S COMPLIANT WITH ALL OF OUR REQUIREMENTS OR CHECKLISTS, AND A FEE IS PAID.

AND SO AND THEN THIS ORDINANCE WILL ALSO BRING US INTO COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. IF YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE AND THEN THE DEFINITION OF WHAT A LAND USE REGULATION IS HERE, AND DUNCAN CRAFTED THIS DEFINITION TO MAKE US COMPLIANT WITH THE STATE CODE. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME OR DUNCAN? ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, COME UP TO THE PODIUM.

YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. IF YOU'RE ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. OKAY. WITH THAT, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR COMMENTS AND OR MOTIONS. COMMISSIONER ALAN, BASED ON THE INFORMATION FINDINGS SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT AND UPON THE EVIDENCE EXPLANATION RECEIVED TODAY, I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FORWARD A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS APPLICATION. COMMISSIONER ACKER, I SECOND THAT MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. THAT CARRIES SIX. NOTHING. NEXT IS ITEM B,

[b. City Code Text Amendment – Manual for Public Improvement Standards, Specifications and Plans, Which are Adopted and Amended as a Set of Land Use Regulations; Amending Sections 8-2-2, 8-3A-2, 8-3A-3,14-5-1 and 14-5-7]

THE CITY CODE TEXT AMENDMENT MANUAL FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS WHICH ARE ADOPTED AND AMENDED AS SET OF LAND USE REGULATIONS. AMENDING SECTION 8-2-28-3, A DASH 28-3, A DASH 314-5-1 AND 14-5-7. LARRY. OKAY. SO YOU CAN SEE IN THAT DESCRIPTION, TITLE EIGHT IS NOT A ZONING ORDINANCE OR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. AND THAT'S GENERALLY THOUGHT OF AS LAND USE REGULATIONS. HOWEVER, FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS, THE CITY HAS ADOPTED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AS LAND USE REGULATIONS. AND THAT REALLY STOPS A LOT OF DEVELOPER ARGUMENT THAT, WELL, THIS IS NO OFFENSE, GARBETT HOMES HERE, BUT THAT THEIR STANDARDS AND THEY'RE NOT REALLY REGULATIONS. BUT THERE WAS A COUPLE OF COURT CASES IN THE UTAH SUPREME COURT THAT REGULATE THAT SAYS THAT ANY TIME A CITY ENFORCES A A STANDARD, IT IS A LAND USE REGULATION AND WESTERN CITY, WE'VE GONE ONE STEP FARTHER AND ADOPTED ALL OF OUR LAND USE, ALL OF THIS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, LAND USE REGULATIONS.

SO THERE'S NO ARGUMENT ABOUT THAT. AND SO IT REQUIRES THE CITY TO ADOPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. AND IS ALL OF YOU HAVE BEEN ON THE COMMISSION FOR A WHILE. I THINK YOU'VE SEEN A FEW. THE LATEST ONE LAST ONE, I BELIEVE, WAS THE STREETLIGHT STANDARD THAT THE PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT BROUGHT THROUGH STATES THAT THE STANDARDS OF LAND USE REGULATIONS AND REGULATIONS REGULATES THE ADOPTION PROCESS. SO IT SPELLS OUT HOW IT'S TO BE DONE, AND IT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE AS A CONDITION OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT THERE'S NO LONGER SAY, WELL, I DON'T REALLY HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT BECAUSE IT'S NOT A LAND USE REGULATION. BUT THERE'S NO ARGUMENT NOW BECAUSE IT SAYS THAT PLANNING ORDINANCE AND THIS BRINGS US INTO COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. SO ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME. ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM WILL BE GIVEN THREE MINUTES. JUST COME UP TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME. IF YOU'RE ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THAT PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP FOR COMMENTS AND OR MOTIONS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER ROBERTS, NOBODY HAS ANY COMMENTS. I WILL MAKE A MOTION

[00:25:03]

BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND FINDINGS SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT AND UPON THE EVIDENCE AND EXPLANATIONS RECEIVED TODAY. I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FORWARD A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS APPLICATION. MR. ACKER, I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. THAT CARRIES SIX.

[c. City Code Text Amendment –Subdivision-Related Changes, including Street Dedication Plat, Boundary Line Adjustments., Consolidation of Lots, Single Parcel Not in a Subdivision, Amending Sections; 13-7H-1 and 13-7H-2, 14-3-4, and Title 14 Subdivisions.]

NOTHING. OKAY. NEXT IS C CITY CODE TEXT AMENDMENT SUBDIVISION RELATED CHANGES INCLUDING STREET DEDICATION, PLATS, BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS, SINGLE PARCEL NOT IN A SUBDIVISION, AND AMENDING SECTIONS 13-7, 8-1 AND 13-7, 8-2, 14-3-4, AND TITLE 14 SUBDIVISIONS. AND SO THIS ORDINANCE AGAIN BRINGS US IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW.

AND SO IT CLARIFIES LANGUAGE ORDINANCE FOR SUBDIVISION RELATED CHANGES. AND ALL THESE ARE CHANGES THAT CAME FROM EITHER THE LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION OR THE ONE BEFORE. AND SO IT REALLY THE STATE LAW WAS KIND OF GRAY ON ALL OF THESE AREAS, BUT IT'S CRYSTAL CLEAR NOW. AND SO THERE'S BEEN CHANGES. WHAT IS THE STREET DEDICATION PLOT? IT'S NOT A SUBDIVISION. NOW. WE USE STREET DEDICATION PLOTS AT TIMES, BUT IT'S NOT CONSIDERED A SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY. IT'S JUST A DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC FOR A RIGHT OF WAY GENERALLY.

BUT IT'S NOT CONSIDERED A SUBDIVISION. BUT WE STILL CAN REQUIRE A PLOT THAT'S RECORDED AT THE COUNTY, REGULATES BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS, AND MORE OR LESS, THEY'RE THEY'RE CONSIDERED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS, BUT THERE'S NO CONFUSION ON THAT ANYMORE BECAUSE IT USED TO BE YEARS AGO THAT YOU COULD ONLY ADJUST A LOT LINE IN A, IN A PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION, BUT NOW YOU CAN GO FROM A BOUNDARY TO ONE SUBDIVISION TO THE OTHER. AND THAT'S BECAUSE THE STATE LAW REGULATES CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS AND PARCELS, NOT IN A SUBDIVISION. NOW, WEST JORDAN HAS HAD THIS ORDINANCE FOR A FEW YEARS NOW. AND AND IN FACT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUST APPROVED A SUBDIVISION A COUPLE OF MEETINGS AGO. IT WAS THE ONE ON THE CANAL, THE REALLY WEIRD SHAPE ON 2200 WEST. BUT THERE'S A LOT OF MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE NOT. THEY THEY REQUIRE THEM TO GO INTO SUBDIVISION OR CREATE A SUBDIVISION OUT OF ONE LOT. AND THAT RUNS CONTRARY TO STATE LAW, BECAUSE YOU CAN'T. WHEN YOU SUBDIVIDE SOMETHING, YOU USUALLY COME UP WITH TWO AND NOT ONE. AND SO THIS SETS OUT REGULATION THAT YOU CAN. BUILD BUILD ON A PARCEL THAT'S NOT IN A SUBDIVISION. AND AGAIN, IT BRINGS THIS IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? I KNOW THIS IS JUST EXCITING STUFF. IT'S. ANY QUESTIONS DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT.

LARRY. RIGHT. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED AS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. COME UP TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME, YOUR ONLINE, RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE'S NO ONE ONLINE. OKAY, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR COMMENT AND OR MOTIONS. COMMISSIONER ALLEN, BASED ON THE INFORMATION FINDINGS SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT UPON THE EVIDENCE EXPLANATION RECEIVED TODAY, I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FORWARD A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS APPLICATION. WE HAVE A MOTION. COMMISSIONER HOLLINGSWORTH, I SECOND THAT MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY.

THAT CARRIES SIX NOTHING. AND THAT ENDS OUR. AGENDA. COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN OUR MEETING.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Consent Calendar

Public Hearings (with final action by the Planning Commission)

Public Hearings (with Recommendation to City Council for Final Action)

Jul 21, 2026 Planning Commission

Consent Calendar

Public Hearings (with final action by the Planning Commission)

Public Hearings (with Recommendation to City Council for Final Action)

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item